Page 2 of 4
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:40 pm
by PoundhillO
For all those that vote for the Tory party that make the rich richer and the poor poorer, shame on you.
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:43 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
PoundhillO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:40 pm
For all those that vote for the Tory party that make the rich richer and the poor poorer, shame on you.
And how are the modern Labour Party any different .? Labour lost me when that Red Tory Blair was leader .
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:53 pm
by Dohnut
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:57 am
SvenO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:35 am
Boris is only power because Labour so ineffective, the Conservatives could literally run any candidate and win.
Yeah, hows the effective party you voted for going?
Even if Labour are ineffective, you dont have to vote for this useless lot.
So what do you suggest?
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:55 pm
by Dohnut
George M wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 12:00 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:57 am
SvenO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:35 am
Boris is only power because Labour so ineffective, the Conservatives could literally run any candidate and win.
Yeah, hows the effective party you voted for going?
Even if Labour are ineffective, you dont have to vote for this useless lot.
You do if you want us to progress economically and socially in the world. There is much more to think about than a silly drinks party. This country is doing rather well compared with Europe. Long may it continue
And that is a truth that is not getting much media time at the moment. But in general economic figures are good.
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:30 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Dohnut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:55 pm
George M wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 12:00 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:57 am
Yeah, hows the effective party you voted for going?
Even if Labour are ineffective, you dont have to vote for this useless lot.
You do if you want us to progress economically and socially in the world. There is much more to think about than a silly drinks party. This country is doing rather well compared with Europe. Long may it continue
And that is a truth that is not getting much media time at the moment. But in general economic figures are good.
Tell that to the people queuing daily, outside food banks, tell that to people struggling to feed themselves and their kids on minimum wage, tell that to everyone below the poverty line, of which more have become under Tory government's.
Tell that to those that have to choose, every winter, between heating or eating , also a number getting bigger every year under Tory government's.
Tory government's are fine for the well off like donut and George, but a disaster for the not well off.
As an aside, the current Labour party is very nearly the same as the Tory party, right wing and supportive of business. There wouldn't be much difference between either government. Either way, the poor are fecked
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:33 pm
by greyhound
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:46 pm
by SvenO
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:49 pm
SvenO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:25 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 1:40 pm
1 seat 200 years always been blue .Not anymore .
Thats why you are losing because know you have to get excited at winning 1 seat.
Its like geting a goal against san marino.
Th
I.think you mean against San Marino !
Plebs everywhere .
Thats all you have capitilisation you are as sad as your party.
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 6:04 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:30 pm
Dohnut wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:55 pm
George M wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 12:00 pm
You do if you want us to progress economically and socially in the world. There is much more to think about than a silly drinks party. This country is doing rather well compared with Europe. Long may it continue
And that is a truth that is not getting much media time at the moment. But in general economic figures are good.
Tell that to the people queuing daily, outside food banks, tell that to people struggling to feed themselves and their kids on minimum wage, tell that to everyone below the poverty line, of which more have become under Tory government's.
Tell that to those that have to choose, every winter, between heating or eating , also a number getting bigger every year under Tory government's.
Tory government's are fine for the well off like donut and George, but a disaster for the not well off.
As an aside, the current Labour party is very nearly the same as the Tory party, right wing and supportive of business. There wouldn't be much difference between either government. Either way, the poor are fecked
I think you're right . Even If Labour wins the next election we'll still have people living below the poverty line and going to food banks .
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 7:12 pm
by greyhound
all party's are all the same promise the earth
until they get in power, then they are full off ...t
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:53 pm
by Max B Gold
greyhound wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 7:12 pm
all party's are all the same promise the earth
until they get in power, then they are full off ...t
To save on words and to ease the burden on the internet may I suggest in future you just post
"They're all the same"
After a short time to establish its meaning this can be further shortened to TATS.
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:36 pm
by SvenO
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:53 pm
greyhound wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 7:12 pm
all party's are all the same promise the earth
until they get in power, then they are full off ...t
To save on words and to ease the burden on the internet may I suggest in future you just post
"They're all the same"
After a short time to establish its meaning this can be further shortened to TATS.
TATS.
Re: Boris
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 11:20 pm
by E10EU
No surprise then that the Met Police are refusing to 'investigate the allegations'.
With them being stationed outside and doing surveillance, they were complicit in these breaches of rules/ laws.
Did they help with carrying the booze filled suitcase over the threshold?
Doing a perfect illustration of THE THREE MONKEYS?
(See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil)
Re: Boris
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:43 am
by tuffers#1
sky running a story of carrie meeting a friend outdoors. a hug was photographe which at the time was against lockdown rules ! Bad Carrie .
Re: Boris
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:45 am
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:54 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:47 pm
Thor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:42 pm
If you really believe that the tory vote won't return come election time then you're more deluded than ever!
If you really dont believe anything but blue , youll be in for a shock .
We are talking about 1 seat not all 600 odd seats.
No Thor we are talking about Bodge .
Re: Boris
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:49 am
by tuffers#1
SvenO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:46 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:49 pm
SvenO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:25 pm
Thats why you are losing because know you have to get excited at winning 1 seat.
Its like geting a goal against san marino.
Th
I.think you mean against San Marino !
Plebs everywhere .
Thats all you have capitilisation you are as sad as your party.
If it were my party , it would be in govt now . brexit would not have happened & the likes of you would be in a siberian Gulag .
Re: Boris
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 7:06 am
by Thor
E10EU wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 11:20 pm
No surprise then that the Met Police are refusing to 'investigate the allegations'.
With them being stationed outside and doing surveillance, they were complicit in these breaches of rules/ laws.
Did they help with carrying the booze filled suitcase over the threshold?
Doing a perfect illustration of THE THREE MONKEYS?
(See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil)
True as the met has been compromised by the commissioner being at the mercy of the government due to her contract extension which never in a million years did she warrant nor deserve.
Re: Boris
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 7:18 am
by greyhound
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:53 pm
greyhound wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 7:12 pm
all party's are all the same promise the earth
until they get in power, then they are full off ...t
To save on words and to ease the burden on the internet may I suggest in future you just post
"They're all the same"
After a short time to establish its meaning this can be further shortened to TATS.
who cares only you NOB.
Re: Boris
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:57 pm
by SvenO
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:49 am
SvenO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:46 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:49 pm
Th
I.think you mean against San Marino !
Plebs everywhere .
Thats all you have capitilisation you are as sad as your party.
If it were my party , it would be in govt now . brexit would not have happened & the likes of you would be in a siberian Gulag .
Loser says what?
The country voted for brexit.
Some didn't know what brexit was but the country still voted for it anyway.
If your party was better maybe it would have been in power to stop or implement brexit better.
You just sound like a bitter poor loser.
Re: Boris
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:09 pm
by tuffers#1
SvenO wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:57 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:49 am
SvenO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:46 pm
Thats all you have capitilisation you are as sad as your party.
If it were my party , it would be in govt now . brexit would not have happened & the likes of you would be in a siberian Gulag .
Loser says what?
The country voted for brexit.
Some didn't know what brexit was but the country still voted for it anyway.
If your party was better maybe it would have been in power to stop or implement brexit better.
You just sound like a bitter poor loser.
As I said if it was my party it would be in power .
Re: Boris
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:24 pm
by SvenO
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:09 pm
SvenO wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:57 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:49 am
If it were my party , it would be in govt now . brexit would not have happened & the likes of you would be in a siberian Gulag .
Loser says what?
The country voted for brexit.
Some didn't know what brexit was but the country still voted for it anyway.
If your party was better maybe it would have been in power to stop or implement brexit better.
You just sound like a bitter poor loser.
As I said if it was my party it would be in power .
That is what Corbyn was thinking.
Re: Boris
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:39 pm
by tuffers#1
SvenO wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:24 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:09 pm
SvenO wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:57 pm
Loser says what?
The country voted for brexit.
Some didn't know what brexit was but the country still voted for it anyway.
If your party was better maybe it would have been in power to stop or implement brexit better.
You just sound like a bitter poor loser.
As I said if it was my party it would be in power .
That is what Corbyn was thinking.
corbyn is far more decent than me . I'd go a bit more Josef Stalin !
Re: Boris
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:38 pm
by SvenO
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:39 pm
SvenO wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:24 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:09 pm
As I said if it was my party it would be in power .
That is what Corbyn was thinking.
corbyn is far more decent than me . I'd go a bit more Josef Stalin !
Stalin had a party, you just have your hand of preference.
Re: Boris
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:48 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Cant believe how much the tory voters are hurting on this thread. Pride properly taken a hit at their awful judgement.
Re: Boris
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:52 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
As bad as it is, they know how much worse it would have been with Corbin.
Re: Boris
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:55 pm
by Long slender neck
Just exactly what would have been worse? The shy Tories never say.
