Page 2 of 3
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:12 pm
by Dohnut
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:03 pm
Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:46 pm
So Corbyn breaks the rules, not for the first time I might add, so posts revert to attacks on Cummings. No surprise there then.
Put on them blinkers people.
Bojos Lies , Lies & more Lies !
Keep defending the indefensible chelsea bun !
I suspect it you look up my opinions on Cummings you will see I wanted the guy sacked and Said Johnson behaved very badly. If that’s your idea of a defence I certainly wouldn’t want to be the goalkeeper. Get your facts right.
But with his majority he can do pretty much what he likes. Not defending BoJo, nor Corbyn. Certainly not Cummings. Just amused at people’s reactions when one of their own screws up. Out rolls the excuses, the what about stuff. There is no excuse.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:13 pm
by BoniO
Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:05 pm
BoniO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:59 pm
Corbyn who? Do you mean the bloke who used to be leader of the opposition? He's a nobody now isn't he? Still at least he owned up & apologised as you'd expect.
Surely no-one would compare his cock-up with Cummings would they? Cummings, the principal policy maker for the Government, flouting the rules and then lying through his teeth about it is, just possibly, a bit worse don't you think.
Really? Like I posted above it’s not the first time. So some underling has more prominence than a recent and former major party leader who wanted to be PM. Makes you wonder just how many times he flouts the rules and gets away with it.
As for apologising, pretty hard to refute the evidence or quote the small print. Not much else he could do.
Stretching a bit there Dohnut. Still it's the norm to aim at Corbyn, even though he's an irrelevance today. I suppose it's because the right are struggling to find anything of note on Starmer, pathetic though it may be.
Strangely, I'm not wondering how many times Corbyn flouts the rules. One, because there is no evidence he has, apart from this instance, and secondly because he's not a person of interest any more. I might as well wonder about how many people down my road, or in my village flout the laws. I doubt I'll ever be that bored.
Re apologising. Cummings didn't. He just lied, then lied some more, and more. Don't you think he was guilty of breaking the rules. Rules he'd probably made up. Corbyn was in the wrong and apologised. That immediately makes him more honest than Cummings.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:16 pm
by tuffers#1
Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:12 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:03 pm
Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:46 pm
So Corbyn breaks the rules, not for the first time I might add, so posts revert to attacks on Cummings. No surprise there then.
Put on them blinkers people.
Bojos Lies , Lies & more Lies !
Keep defending the indefensible chelsea bun !
I suspect it you look up my opinions on Cummings you will see I wanted the guy sacked and Said Johnson behaved very badly. If that’s your idea of a defence I certainly wouldn’t want to be the goalkeeper. Get your facts right.
But with his majority he can do pretty much what he likes. Not defending BoJo, nor Corbyn. Certainly not Cummings. Just amused at people’s reactions when one of their own screws up. Out rolls the excuses, the what about stuff. There is no excuse.
I think you are confusing Humour with Excuses Thory sorry i meant Doh Nut
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:07 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:46 pm
So Corbyn breaks the rules, not for the first time I might add, so posts revert to attacks on Cummings. No surprise there then.
Put on them blinkers people.
No, the OP referenced Cummings.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:31 pm
by Dohnut
BoniO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:13 pm
Dohnut wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:05 pm
BoniO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:59 pm
Corbyn who? Do you mean the bloke who used to be leader of the opposition? He's a nobody now isn't he? Still at least he owned up & apologised as you'd expect.
Surely no-one would compare his cock-up with Cummings would they? Cummings, the principal policy maker for the Government, flouting the rules and then lying through his teeth about it is, just possibly, a bit worse don't you think.
Really? Like I posted above it’s not the first time. So some underling has more prominence than a recent and former major party leader who wanted to be PM. Makes you wonder just how many times he flouts the rules and gets away with it.
As for apologising, pretty hard to refute the evidence or quote the small print. Not much else he could do.
Stretching a bit there Dohnut. Still it's the norm to aim at Corbyn, even though he's an irrelevance today. I suppose it's because the right are struggling to find anything of note on Starmer, pathetic though it may be.
Strangely, I'm not wondering how many times Corbyn flouts the rules. One, because there is no evidence he has, apart from this instance, and secondly because he's not a person of interest any more. I might as well wonder about how many people down my road, or in my village flout the laws. I doubt I'll ever be that bored.
Re apologising. Cummings didn't. He just lied, then lied some more, and more. Don't you think he was guilty of breaking the rules. Rules he'd probably made up. Corbyn was in the wrong and apologised. That immediately makes him more honest than Cummings.
Cummings should have apologised, he should have been sacked. That episode is a shambles. Been done to death.
As for before. Corbyn was photographed in a park having a chat with a guy, not adhering to the 2m rule. A picture that found its way into the papers. So this is not the first time.
I think this tit-for-tat stuff is Missing the point. He should have damned well known better. Frankly he will be fully aware of the rules, he can count above six. Total blatant disregard. His crime, the photograph getting out. He got caught out. Apologising don’t make it OK.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:33 pm
by PoliticOs
It doesn't, and he absolutely should apologise. And has. Where is Dom's?
Cumming's was mentioned in the OP, Doh. Tad ironic for the man that likes to say 'but Corbyn!' to everything.
(JC should also get a fine and seriously up his f*cking game too)
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:37 pm
by BoniO
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:33 pm
It doesn't, and he absolutely should apologise. And has. Where is Dom's?
Cumming's was mentioned in the OP, Doh. Tad ironic for the man that likes to say 'but Corbyn!' to everything.
(JC should also get a fine and seriously up his f*cking game too)
What he said ........
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:43 pm
by Oiram
BoniO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:16 am
Oiram wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:07 am
BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:02 am
At this point, who cares?
People who have been abiding by the rules care as those who are not are prolonging this misery.
You want to see football live sooner, abide by the rules.
Bonio wrote:-
Seeing football live isn't really up there as one of the most critical aims at the moment is it?
As this is a ‘Football Forum’ it is relevant but agree not high priority but is party of the ‘economy’ affecting other businesses and infrastructure.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:50 pm
by Oiram
BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:44 am
Oiram wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:07 am
BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:02 am
At this point, who cares?
People who have been abiding by the rules care as those who are not are prolonging this misery.
You want to see football live sooner, abide by the rules.
Really? You’ve abided by every single rule since March?
Yes I have actually and most of my friends and family have. I have older friends who have been indoors for months . Some have underlying health issues and are terrified of catching the virus. It is frustrating for them seeing demonstrations up town , openly breaking rules and law when they are ‘imprisoned’
The fact is there are still many people in the UK that are law abiding and rule abiding from not dropping litter you taking Government advice and directions seriously. Those who do not in my view are prolonging this great inconvenience.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:51 pm
by tuffers#1
https://www.expressandstar.com/news/uk- ... ng-street/
Stanley in a shop with No Mask .
Does he not listen to his son ?
Probably not , he knows he is not quite upto it
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:41 am
by Thor
Biggesy there are also people who are now petrified to leave the house. A women my wife works with will not leave the house as she is so scared of catching covid, this is a serious mental health issue which is maybe being overlooked.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:43 am
by Thor
Whilst I don’t like wee jimmy krankie I’ve got to say well done to her for her actions and comments on the rule breaker in her party.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 7:47 am
by Disoriented
Thor wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:41 am
Biggesy there are also people who are now petrified to leave the house. A women my wife works with will not leave the house as she is so scared of catching covid, this is a serious mental health issue which is maybe being overlooked.
Overlooked?
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:24 am
by Dohnut
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:33 pm
It doesn't, and he absolutely should apologise. And has. Where is Dom's?
Cumming's was mentioned in the OP, Doh. Tad ironic for the man that likes to say 'but Corbyn!' to everything.
(JC should also get a fine and seriously up his f*cking game too)
In anticipation of the what about response. Predictable. Corbyn was the subject of the post and it’s obvious he will get mentioned in a story about him.
The reaction by some was so obvious from the start. Makes me laugh.
As for my utter dislike of Corbyn. People, look at the facts. Look at what he did to a proud party. So I should like him? Get real. I said he was a disaster from day 1. I was right. He continues to be an embarrassment.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:32 am
by Story of O
I was at B&Q a few weeks ago and when I went to pay there was a cashier there who I think will petrified for a long time. While none of the other cashiers had a mask on as they were behind a perspex screen, she had a mask and a face shield on. She told every customer to stand further back than the 2 meter line that was there and cleaned the card machine after every transaction
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:44 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Dohnut wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:24 am
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:33 pm
It doesn't, and he absolutely should apologise. And has. Where is Dom's?
Cumming's was mentioned in the OP, Doh. Tad ironic for the man that likes to say 'but Corbyn!' to everything.
(JC should also get a fine and seriously up his f*cking game too)
In anticipation of the what about response. Predictable. Corbyn was the subject of the post and it’s obvious he will get mentioned in a story about him.
The reaction by some was so obvious from the start. Makes me laugh.
As for my utter dislike of Corbyn. People, look at the facts. Look at what he did to a proud party. So I should like him? Get real. I said he was a disaster from day 1. I was right. He continues to be an embarrassment.
Look what he did? Securing the second highest number of votes the party has ever recorded, despite the best efforts of the internal machinery? Or attempting to return the party to its socialist roots, again against the wishes of the internal machinery? Is that what you mean?
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:32 am
by Mick McQuaid
He means the labour party that started and ended with Tony Blair.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 11:14 am
by Thor
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:44 am
Dohnut wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:24 am
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:33 pm
It doesn't, and he absolutely should apologise. And has. Where is Dom's?
Cumming's was mentioned in the OP, Doh. Tad ironic for the man that likes to say 'but Corbyn!' to everything.
(JC should also get a fine and seriously up his f*cking game too)
In anticipation of the what about response. Predictable. Corbyn was the subject of the post and it’s obvious he will get mentioned in a story about him.
The reaction by some was so obvious from the start. Makes me laugh.
As for my utter dislike of Corbyn. People, look at the facts. Look at what he did to a proud party. So I should like him? Get real. I said he was a disaster from day 1. I was right. He continues to be an embarrassment.
Look what he did? Securing the second highest number of votes the party has ever recorded, despite the best efforts of the internal machinery? Or attempting to return the party to its socialist roots, again against the wishes of the internal machinery? Is that what you mean?
You may be right redo, but the people rejected what he stood for and that my friend is all that matters. This is not a socialist country and never will be, Kier recognises that and is massively distancing himself from that or he too will be unelectable. To be fair to Kier so far so good.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 11:57 am
by PoliticOs
Dohnut wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:24 am
PoliticOs wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:33 pm
It doesn't, and he absolutely should apologise. And has. Where is Dom's?
Cumming's was mentioned in the OP, Doh. Tad ironic for the man that likes to say 'but Corbyn!' to everything.
(JC should also get a fine and seriously up his f*cking game too)
In anticipation of the what about response. Predictable. Corbyn was the subject of the post and it’s obvious he will get mentioned in a story about him.
The reaction by some was so obvious from the start. Makes me laugh.
As for my utter dislike of Corbyn. People, look at the facts. Look at what he did to a proud party. So I should like him? Get real. I said he was a disaster from day 1. I was right. He continues to be an embarrassment.
I'm sure you definitely knew about him from day one. I bet you knew all about the backbencher MP from your many nightly readings of Hansard.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:18 am
by Thor
Well the lefties let me down on this one as it didn’t get to 6 pages, I’m most hurt by the lack of disgust concerning corbyns dinner party.
So I’m gonna try again.
CORBYN BREAKS THE RULES AGAIN.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... orial.html
Now let’s be having you, where are you? Copy right delia Smith.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:58 am
by Sid Bishop
Thor wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:18 am
Well the lefties let me down on this one as it didn’t get to 6 pages, I’m most hurt by the lack of disgust concerning corbyns dinner party.
So I’m gonna try again.
CORBYN BREAKS THE RULES AGAIN.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... orial.html
Now let’s be having you, where are you? Copy right delia Smith.
Strange one this this.
Wonder why Jeremy Corbyn once again ignored the various government guidelines regarding Covid 19 ?
The many various Politicians who do likewise are not setting a good example are they, President Trump being one of the chief culprits.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 2:18 pm
by Thor
I'm surprised sid that such an upstanding communist doesn't follow the law of the land. Shame on corbyn.
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:57 pm
by Clive Evans
Who is Jeremy Corbyn?
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 10:09 pm
by Disoriented
Jeremy who?
Re: One rule for us and another rule for
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 10:19 pm
by Sid Bishop
Perhaps Jeremy is of the same mind as his brother Piers ?
17 October 2020
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ck-in.html
Jeremy Corbyn's brother Piers, 73, who was fined £10,000 for his part in a previous rally, stood with a megaphone among the crowd that had gathered in Oxford Street earlier today. Protesters chanted 'stick your poison vaccine up your ar*e', 'take off your masks' and 'we are the 99%' as they walked down the street. Some carried placards blaming the virus on the new 5G network, while others claimed the virus itself was a hoax.
Jeremy Corbyn's brother Piers, 73, who was fined £10,000 for his part in a previous rally, stood with a megaphone among the crowd that had gathered in Oxford Street earlier today. Protesters chanted 'stick your poison vaccine up your ar*e', 'take off your masks' and 'we are the 99%' as they walked down the street. Some carried placards blaming the virus on the new 5G network, while others claimed the virus itself was a hoax.
