The 20 mins he played before the season finished showed that he was 100% ready and good to go. Honestly.Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2020 10:11 amI think the point is that that would be true based on his former pedigree. But he's 38 and hasn't played a full game of football for about 14 months now. I'd take a guess that he aint cheap either. Knowing he had a bad injury last season we effectively threw away being able to bring in at least and maybe 2 other players who could have contributed. I love the bloke and think he is 100% worth keeping on in some capacity but even if the season started next week and he started, how many games would he actually be able to play/theres a huge risk he gets injured again and thats it.RedO wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:37 amIf we started up again on Saturday, he goes into the starting XI. Who would you have ahead of him?NuneatonO's wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2020 1:04 am If we had unlimited resources, then yes, Jobi would be a 'nice to have' in reserve.
However, I really can't help thinking that this wage could have been used more purposefully towards signing a new player - preferably, a proven goal-scorer?
I have criticised all of the extensions handed out to the likes of Brill, Coulson, Dayton etc. I criticised us resigning Jobi when he came back after his first period with us. But this is absolutely the right thing to do.