Page 2 of 2
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:42 am
by Thor
No tuffers I'm just a normal bloke who goes out of his way to help others at all times. Sometimes to my own detriment as well, but that doesn't matter to me as long as someone is benefiting and I'm doing a good deed it don't matter. What's needed is a few more people doing the same and life would be infinitely better for all.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:59 am
by Dunners
Who's Gary Jacob's?
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 9:22 am
by Admin
Based on our ancient pugilistic barrister’s legal practice, it could be this one
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Jacobs_(solicitor)
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 9:30 am
by Fanny
Redcard wrote: ↑Sat Mar 28, 2020 7:28 pm
Thor, some years ago when I had another user name I had an altercation with him , and it led to a challenge for a fight.
He suggested we meet at London zoo at 10.0 at night. I live local to regents park and decided not to drive, but walk in case anyone took note of my reg number after I left him in a heap. I didn’t know he lived in Scotland , so I guess he had the last laugh, no on second thoughts I did as I could see the funny side of it. Somebody on the board following the shindigs asked if I really did turn up. I replied that I did, and I had 2 giraffes as witnesses which was perfectly true.
Surely a couple of elephants are more reliable witnesses?
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:10 am
by slacker
Can’t help chuckling at a boardin’ feud that leads to a “say it to my face” moment. Always best when the venue is the Birky Bogs, mind
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:18 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Nah, the sheer randomness of London Zoo wins hands down.
Is this the old boy who cheeky monkey ended up meeting to prove he really was a barrister or something? Used to want to duff up anyone who made him look a bit silly on here?
Where on earth has he been hiding all these years?
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:52 am
by Admin
RedO wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:18 am
Nah, the sheer randomness of London Zoo wins hands down.
Is this the old boy who cheeky monkey ended up meeting to prove he really was a barrister or something? Used to want to duff up anyone who made him look a bit silly on here?
Where on earth has he been hiding all these years?
Broadmoor
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:58 am
by Dunners
I think we're alright so long as we don't lie. He can't stand liars.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:01 am
by Thor
Red card has been on here for a long time. Still I can't understand why people want to wind people up hiding behind a keyboard. We can all wum at times but some on here take it to the extreme. Red card is ok in my eyes, some of the people trying g to wind him and others up are not.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:39 am
by Max B Gold
Not that one.
The Glasgow based boxer who was British Champ a few years back.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:41 am
by Max B Gold
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:01 am
Red card has been on here for a long time. Still I can't understand why people want to wind people up hiding behind a keyboard. We can all wum at times but some on here take it to the extreme. Red card is ok in my eyes, some of the people trying g to wind him and others up are not.
What is ok about a man who can't cope with liars and continually threatens them with violence?
You don't half talk keech.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:59 am
by Thor
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:41 am
Thor wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:01 am
Red card has been on here for a long time. Still I can't understand why people want to wind people up hiding behind a keyboard. We can all wum at times but some on here take it to the extreme. Red card is ok in my eyes, some of the people trying g to wind him and others up are not.
What is ok about a man who can't cope with liars and continually threatens them with violence?
You don't half talk keech.
He ain't threatened me and he would not do it either as I don't treat him like he's a fool like you do. Sow your seeds reap the whirlwind.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 12:03 pm
by slacker
Sow your seeds reap the whirlwind.
That makes no sense...Are you mixing up your epigrams?
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 12:33 pm
by Thor
Yep looks like it, ha ha.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:40 pm
by Redcard
At last, a confession to lying by Maxie boy. “What is o.k about a man who can’t cope with liars and continuously threatens them with violence.”..............that closes the account. Relax Maxie boy .
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 6:00 pm
by Max B Gold
Redcard wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:40 pm
At last, a confession to lying by Maxie boy. “What is o.k about a man who can’t cope with liars and continuously threatens them with violence.”..............that closes the account. Relax Maxie boy .
Not really. I was lying again. I can't stop.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 7:17 pm
by Redcard
I sympathize with you, I can’t stop telling the truth, gets me in far more trouble.
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 7:24 pm
by tuffers#1
Admin wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:52 am
RedO wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:18 am
Nah, the sheer randomness of London Zoo wins hands down.
Is this the old boy who cheeky monkey ended up meeting to prove he really was a barrister or something? Used to want to duff up anyone who made him look a bit silly on here?
Where on earth has he been hiding all these years?
Broadmoor
Oi
Never been to Broadmoor
Been to Rampton once ot twice but never broadmoor
Re: Question Re the law of the land
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 7:41 pm
by Redcard
I think you are still there