The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
It used to be because it was a cash cow. In the old days only half the turnstiles got counted for the takings. Even in Hearn's era you'd here a crowd figure and think really? We'd be 500 from capacity and we had 6800 according to the announcer.
The EFL have no power to stop anyone buying a limited company.Thor wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 7:40 am Apparently the ceo has authorised the leasing of a fleet of range rovers and property in knightsbridge. That among other things has p*ssed off the majority shareholder, if it's TRUE I have no idea. It's also interesting that the majority shareholder has not yet passed the fit and proper persosns test at the efl.
Why were they allowed to take over without such satisfactions being granted by the league? Sounds like incompetence at the efl for allowing this to happen.
Oh my lord, you are hysterical. The word we seemed to clash over was 'effective' so just to be clear this word has 3 syllables, not 1. Yet again, you have proven to be irredeemably and unremittingly STUPID (hope that's not too many long words for you)spen666 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 3:00 pmEH16 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 2:13 pmI hate to derail a good argument with, like, actual real facts but if you READ your OWN initial post even you should be able to see that you didn't say any such thing initially. Only now, realising you've made yourself look a fool AGAIN, have you added the word EFFECTIVE. This correspondence is now closed.spen666 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 1:19 pm
And if a club says to the EFL they will not agree to the demands of the EFL....the only sanction is expulsion ...which is what I said.
Fine the club doesn't force it to change directors. Deduct points doesn't force it to change directors
the only effective sanction is expulsion which will almost certainly bring about the demise of the club
which is what I said initially
Sorry,
I never realized that you were so stupid I had to spell everything out in words of one syllable. I never realized you were unable to develop thoughts for yourself and had to be spoon fed.
I did not use the word effective because anyone with half a brain cell would realize that it is pointless debating what ineffective sanction should be imposed. If you know an action is ineffective, then no sensible person would consider it a sanction. I added it into my response because it became apparent that
I was dealing with someone stupid enough to need me to spell it out for them
EH16 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 4:33 pmOh my lord, you are hysterical. The word we seemed to clash over was 'effective' so just to be clear this word has 3 syllables, not 1. Yet again, you have proven to be irredeemably and unremittingly STUPID (hope that's not too many long words for you)spen666 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 3:00 pmEH16 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 2:13 pm
I hate to derail a good argument with, like, actual real facts but if you READ your OWN initial post even you should be able to see that you didn't say any such thing initially. Only now, realising you've made yourself look a fool AGAIN, have you added the word EFFECTIVE. This correspondence is now closed.
Sorry,
I never realized that you were so stupid I had to spell everything out in words of one syllable. I never realized you were unable to develop thoughts for yourself and had to be spoon fed.
I did not use the word effective because anyone with half a brain cell would realize that it is pointless debating what ineffective sanction should be imposed. If you know an action is ineffective, then no sensible person would consider it a sanction. I added it into my response because it became apparent that
I was dealing with someone stupid enough to need me to spell it out for them
Fantastic. Job done.spen666 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:09 pmEH16 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 4:33 pmOh my lord, you are hysterical. The word we seemed to clash over was 'effective' so just to be clear this word has 3 syllables, not 1. Yet again, you have proven to be irredeemably and unremittingly STUPID (hope that's not too many long words for you)spen666 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 3:00 pm
Sorry,
I never realized that you were so stupid I had to spell everything out in words of one syllable. I never realized you were unable to develop thoughts for yourself and had to be spoon fed.
I did not use the word effective because anyone with half a brain cell would realize that it is pointless debating what ineffective sanction should be imposed. If you know an action is ineffective, then no sensible person would consider it a sanction. I added it into my response because it became apparent that
I was dealing with someone stupid enough to need me to spell it out for them
Goodbye
