Independent Leyton Orient Forum

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 3:51 pm
Bring back James Alabi immediately !!!!!!

Now I really know you're on a windup, gave me a chuckle you can have this one

gshaw wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:49 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 3:51 pm
Bring back James Alabi immediately !!!!!!

Now I really know you're on a windup, gave me a chuckle you can have this one

Thats is all down to you g

It was you who said Alabi had been
dropped & we havent won since .

The last game we won James Scored
Its in the official records innit !

Apart from 2-3 win at Cambridge.

Well it looked like hit and hope to me today.

Couldn't quite work out the formation or where players should be playing.

It was quite clearly 4-5-1, 3 narrow in midfield in a triangle with JMD and Wilko out wide and pushing on.

Does he have one?

FORMATTION 4132 is the way to go or why not 442

faith1234 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:57 pm FORMATTION 4132 is the way to go or why not 442

Formattion wasn’t playing

RedO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:56 pm It was quite clearly 4-5-1, 3 narrow in midfield in a triangle with JMD and Wilko out wide and pushing on.

Basic maths you can’t make a triangle from 4 5 1

Side lengths do not adhere to the triangle inequality theorem. Which states that the sum of the side lengths of any 2 sides of a triangle must exceed the length of the third side.

Sorry !!!

Yes you are sorry. Why don’t you give up trying to be smart, you fail every time.

Redcard wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:20 pm Yes you are sorry. Why don’t you give up trying to be smart, you fail every time.

I’ll give up trying to be smart the day you stop being a racist lummox
Deal?

I have never been a racist just a realist, and you will never really be smart.

Redcard wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:25 pm I have never been a racist just a realist, and you will never really be smart.

Just a realist??

Ignorance is bliss eh

Then in that case you can bliss off.

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:15 pm

RedO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:56 pm It was quite clearly 4-5-1, 3 narrow in midfield in a triangle with JMD and Wilko out wide and pushing on.

Basic maths you can’t make a triangle from 4 5 1

Side lengths do not adhere to the triangle inequality theorem. Which states that the sum of the side lengths of any 2 sides of a triangle must exceed the length of the third side.

Sorry !!!

You both no triangles are just a Rhombus
split in half don't you

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:17 pm

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:15 pm

RedO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:56 pm It was quite clearly 4-5-1, 3 narrow in midfield in a triangle with JMD and Wilko out wide and pushing on.

Basic maths you can’t make a triangle from 4 5 1

Side lengths do not adhere to the triangle inequality theorem. Which states that the sum of the side lengths of any 2 sides of a triangle must exceed the length of the third side.

Sorry !!!

You both no triangles are just a Rhombus
split in half don't you

Hmm only if it’s congruent Mr T

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:19 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:17 pm

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:15 pm

Basic maths you can’t make a triangle from 4 5 1

Side lengths do not adhere to the triangle inequality theorem. Which states that the sum of the side lengths of any 2 sides of a triangle must exceed the length of the third side.

Sorry !!!

You both no triangles are just a Rhombus
split in half don't you

Hmm only if it’s congruent Mr T

Congruence ?


The three most widely accepted contemporary theories of truth are the CorrespondenceTheory ; [ii] the Semantic Theory of Tarski and Davidson; and [iii] the Deflationary Theory of Frege and Ramsey. The competing theoriesare [iv] the Coherence Theory , and [v] the Pragmatic Theory .

Congruent

Using congruent triangles, one can prove that the rhombus is symmetric across each of these diagonals. ... Opposite angles of a rhombus have equal measure. The two diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular; that is, a rhombus is an orthodiagonal quadrilateral. Its diagonals bisect opposite angles.

What was ross moaning at the ref about at full time? He was pointing around our half of the pitch, whereas the pen shouts were at the other end.

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:25 pm What was ross moaning at the ref about at full time? He was pointing around our half of the pitch, whereas the pen shouts were at the other end.

Not sure but possibly that in the 1st half for sure the Ref didn't give a single foul for the half dozen I saw .

Challenges that we got booked for were only fouls the other way round. How late in the game was their number 2 booked for example? Yet he was doing it all game.

There no 8 was booked quite early in the game for clattering Brophy
What’s your point?

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:27 pm

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:25 pm What was ross moaning at the ref about at full time? He was pointing around our half of the pitch, whereas the pen shouts were at the other end.

Not sure but possibly that in the 1st half for sure the Ref didn't give a single foul for the half dozen I saw .

Someone should have gone to Specsavers.

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:30 pm Challenges that we got booked for were only fouls the other way round. How late in the game was their number 2 booked for example? Yet he was doing it all game.

That’s simply not true.

The only one I’d query was Hectors, which seemed a tad harsh. It was his first foul all game.

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:25 pm What was ross moaning at the ref about at full time? He was pointing around our half of the pitch, whereas the pen shouts were at the other end.

To me Ross spends too much time moaning at the 4th official as though he can change anything.
Ian Holloway by comparison was concentrating on his team, as he should be.