Independent Leyton Orient Forum

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:55 am

spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:51 am

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:48 am Why would anyone spoil a perfect day by having tje telly on at 3pm ?

Just watch it on bbci the next morning on the bog

Not an issue with whether anyone watches it or not, the issue being why lie about it, then why does another MP compound the lie with more idiotic lies.

He said he watched it in the morning .

He wasnt asked which morning &
he didnt say what morning .

Another Non story latched on to by the resident trolls

spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:51 am

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:48 am Why would anyone spoil a perfect day by having tje telly on at 3pm ?

Just watch it on bbci the next morning on the bog

Not an issue with whether anyone watches it or not, the issue being why lie about it, then why does another MP compound the lie with more idiotic lies.

RedO wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:59 am ...m

Anyone saying it'd be ok if he admitted he didn't watch the goat-hoofed old c**t spout her bile at 3pm on Xmas day is a lying hypocrite and they knows it.

Beradogs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 11:03 am I was out walking the dog in the countryside with my white curtain twitching racist neighbors, just like me, this morning, and we all agreed Corbs would be a catastrophe for this country.

spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:57 am

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:55 am

spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:51 am

Not an issue with whether anyone watches it or not, the issue being why lie about it, then why does another MP compound the lie with more idiotic lies.

He said he watched it in the morning .

He wasnt asked which morning &
he didnt say what morning .

Another Non story latched on to by the resident trolls

Erm not a very good lie.

He was asked what he did on Christmas Day. He said he watched the Queens speech in the morning . He was saying what he did on Christmas Day morning.

I agree it was a non story until he lied and then Angela Rayner dug the hole deeper

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:39 am

Thor wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 11:13 pm So I’ve just seen the interview he did. I wonder if I could take a couple of homeless people around his house if he’d give them a bed, food and some advice on a daily basis for say a month. So do you think he would be happy to do that?

Why would he?

He's arguing that there should be proper funding and resources to ensure that homelessness is eroded through the provision of affordable council housing.

Doing what you are suggesting is a charitable act but one which undermines the argument.

Thor wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 12:11 pm If they want to help them, give them a home now, not wait till your in power.

Thor wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 12:11 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:39 am

Thor wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 11:13 pm So I’ve just seen the interview he did. I wonder if I could take a couple of homeless people around his house if he’d give them a bed, food and some advice on a daily basis for say a month. So do you think he would be happy to do that?

Why would he?

He's arguing that there should be proper funding and resources to ensure that homelessness is eroded through the provision of affordable council housing.

Doing what you are suggesting is a charitable act but one which undermines the argument.

Cos he’s going to give chequers over to the homeless. McDonald is going to give No.11 to the homeless. I’m not against helping these people as like I said previously I’ve volunteered to work in a homeless shelter. If they want to help them, give them a home now, not wait till your in power.

I do agree though that funding needs to be made available to councils to access and build “council houses” once more. Not for profit or if there is any profit it’s reinvested back in to more council houses and not spent to cover goals elsewhere.

Dunners wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 12:14 pm

Thor wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 12:11 pm If they want to help them, give them a home now, not wait till your in power.

Just imagine not grasping the lack of logic in this statement when making this post.

RedO wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 12:27 pm

Thor wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 12:11 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:39 am

Why would he?

He's arguing that there should be proper funding and resources to ensure that homelessness is eroded through the provision of affordable council housing.

Doing what you are suggesting is a charitable act but one which undermines the argument.

Cos he’s going to give chequers over to the homeless. McDonald is going to give No.11 to the homeless. I’m not against helping these people as like I said previously I’ve volunteered to work in a homeless shelter. If they want to help them, give them a home now, not wait till your in power.

I do agree though that funding needs to be made available to councils to access and build “council houses” once more. Not for profit or if there is any profit it’s reinvested back in to more council houses and not spent to cover goals elsewhere.

What exactly are you going on about?