The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
He can't be impeached, that's only for American politiciansDisoriented wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:02 pm Has to happen, especially as his judgement on everything is ‘impeared’.
Lying to her majesty is as low as it gets.
As much as I respect you fella, especially the sweaty sock judgesDisoriented wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 6:24 amMy question was, ‘Do you respect the judiciary?’RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:28 amWtf are you talking about ? A court in Northern Ireland and England ruled Boris acted within the Law. A court in Scotland disagreed . The Supreme Court will ultimately decide next week one way or another .Disoriented wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:24 pm
So you do not respect the judiciary?
Spoken like a true right—winger.
Your grasp of the law is as tenous as your grip on reality.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:28 amWtf are you talking about ? A court in Northern Ireland and England ruled Boris acted within the Law. A court in Scotland disagreed . The Supreme Court will ultimately decide next week one way or another .Disoriented wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:24 pmSo you do not respect the judiciary?RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:34 pm
Wait and see what the judiciary says next week in the Supreme Court . They may agree or not but it’s certainly not definitive at the moment
Spoken like a true right—winger.
Misleading is not the same as lyingDisoriented wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:14 pmThe judiciary in fair Scotland have spoken. Johnson misled the Queen.greyhound wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:06 pmDisoriented wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:02 pm Has to happen, especially as his judgement on everything is ‘impeared’.
Lying to her majesty is as low as it gets.
where is your proof.
It doesn’t get more definitive than that.
Yeah it's what the posh people say to their own kind when they mean lying but don't because it's not polite.
It's still not the same, it's easy to mislead without lyingMax B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:02 pmYeah it's what the posh people say to their own kind when they mean lying but don't because it's not polite.spen666 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:00 pmMisleading is not the same as lyingDisoriented wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:14 pm
The judiciary in fair Scotland have spoken. Johnson misled the Queen.
It doesn’t get more definitive than that.
Yes, yes professor but that was not my point and where does lying by omission stand in all of this legal gobblydegookspen666 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:32 pmIt's still not the same, it's easy to mislead without lyingMax B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:02 pmYeah it's what the posh people say to their own kind when they mean lying but don't because it's not polite.
Where does any court find Boris has lied?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:44 pmYes, yes professor but that was not my point and where does lying by omission stand in all of this legal gobblydegookspen666 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:32 pmIt's still not the same, it's easy to mislead without lyingMax B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:02 pm
Yeah it's what the posh people say to their own kind when they mean lying but don't because it's not polite.
Blimey, make your mind up - I've just ordered a chainsaw from Amazon!West Side Story wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:17 pm May I suggest locking up Spen69 with Boris. No need for the hanging, drawing and quartering ( yet )
Just use it to cut through the crap on here.BoniO wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:16 pmBlimey, make your mind up - I've just ordered a chainsaw from Amazon!West Side Story wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:17 pm May I suggest locking up Spen69 with Boris. No need for the hanging, drawing and quartering ( yet )
I can't see what Spen is doing wrong, he's holding his ground on his own job and knowledge of the Law, unlike the trouble makers who refuse to accept his knowledge.
point nine one eight wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 10:41 amI can't see what Spen is doing wrong, he's holding his ground on his own job and knowledge of the Law, unlike the trouble makers who refuse to accept his knowledge.
Only a fellow lawyer could determine whether he is ‘technically correct’.UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 11:39 amYes as a lawyer mr mr spen is technically correct however what the admin is focusing on is how spen will treat this forum as a place to be specific to a point it becomes tiresomepoint nine one eight wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 10:41 amI can't see what Spen is doing wrong, he's holding his ground on his own job and knowledge of the Law, unlike the trouble makers who refuse to accept his knowledge.
Look all of us apart from spen are just people with opinions which are based on our perception
Some times the views which are not technically correct sum up a person feeling
Not tactically correct though.UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:01 pmI guess your correct but I am virtually positive mr spen is technically correct on what is really a basic matterDisoriented wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 11:54 amOnly a fellow lawyer could determine whether he is ‘technically correct’.UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 11:39 am
Yes as a lawyer mr mr spen is technically correct however what the admin is focusing on is how spen will treat this forum as a place to be specific to a point it becomes tiresome
Look all of us apart from spen are just people with opinions which are based on our perception
Some times the views which are not technically correct sum up a person feeling
