Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 8:52 am
What actually happened against Southend?
Independent Leyton Orient Forum
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Statement from Nigel Travis
Page 2 of 4
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 8:55 am
Not suitable for the network. Please phone me.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 8:58 am
The fact Travis needed to word it like that when sending out an OFFicial warning is telling though. Why say that unless there was evidence of abuse from someone, irrespective of who they are, with special club privileges?LittleMate wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 8:15 amNothing to be intrigued about. He's just making its clear to absolutely everyone about the club's position. Sometimes some people are inclined to read something and think that somehow it does not apply to them. This disabuses them of that.HARVEY T DENTON wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 7:28 am "Please take this as a strong warning. There will be no exceptions, regardless of the individual’s position or history with the Club."
I'm OFFicially intrigued. Great statement mind.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:16 am
OFF was not there.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:30 am
Yes, that's already been raised in another thread. The message from Travis mentions future action to be taken for future abuse though and he's clearly warning certain people, not just OFF, that they might want to think twice if they fancied gobbing off with racial abuse in future.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:37 am
Nigel has not mentioned anything about 'gobbing off'. It's clearly to do with racialist comments.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:30 amYes, that's already been raised in this thread. The message from Travis mentions future action to be taken for future abuse though and he's clearly warning certain people, not just OFF, that they might want to think twice before gobbing off.
Why if OFFs name even being dragged into this?
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:47 am
I should have clarified that when I said gobbing off I meant gobbing off with racial abuse. I'll edit my post to make that clear. But I've clearly said it's a warning to all people irrespective of their history and standing within the club, not just OFF.RedO wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:37 amNigel has not mentioned anything about 'gobbing off'. It's clearly to do with racialist comments.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:30 amYes, that's already been raised in this thread. The message from Travis mentions future action to be taken for future abuse though and he's clearly warning certain people, not just OFF, that they might want to think twice before gobbing off.
Why if OFFs name even being dragged into this?
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:49 am
Why the need to add the 'not just OFF' comment though?
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:50 am
Because he has been raised in this thread already.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:52 am
By you.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 10:17 am
I think you'll find it was the below post where it was brought up.
And then he was referred to again in the below before I commented to support that.HARVEY T DENTON wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 7:28 am "Please take this as a strong warning. There will be no exceptions, regardless of the individual’s position or history with the Club."
I'm OFFicially intrigued. Great statement mind.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 10:43 am
Think it’s a bit harsh to bring him into it. He might not be everyone’s cup of tea but for all his berating of the opposition, it’s never racist.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 11:20 am
Matt was not even there. no need to bring him into it. He is most certainly not racist
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 11:55 am
Sorry chaps, but I think I’m missing something.
Who is OFF?
Who is OFF?
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:04 pm
Why is Matt even been mentioned in this thread ?
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:06 pm
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:19 pm
And is a racist?
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:36 pm
At last, some sense has been restored. The message from Nigel on racism has nothing to do with OFF. Can we now please drop his name from the subject?
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:01 pm
Censorship
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:06 pm
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:07 pm
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:10 pm
After your first two attempts to get a reaction on this thread failed miserably this is what you’re reduced to?
Absolutely staggering that not only did you manage to weasel out of a perma ban but escaped re-banning after being caught out breaking the rules again with multiple accounts.
I’m sure that your grovelling promise to the mods to behave after you avoided a repeat ban didn’t include sticking up for nonces and wumming on a thread about racism.
Have no idea what the mods are thinking letting you continuously break the rules without punishment.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:34 pm
Snowflake alertP&O wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:10 pmAfter your first two attempts to get a reaction on this thread failed miserably this is what you’re reduced to?
Absolutely staggering that not only did you manage to weasel out of a perma ban but escaped re-banning after being caught out breaking the rules again with multiple accounts.
I’m sure that your grovelling promise to the mods to behave after you avoided a repeat ban didn’t include sticking up for nonces and wumming on a thread about racism.
Have no idea what the mods are thinking letting you continuously break the rules without punishment.
Saying censorship is hardly Wumming.
It's a perfect description of what I was commenting on?
BTW before you threw you toys out of the pram with your rant, do you even know what I was referring to by the word "censorship"?
No, thought not
Censorship by moderators would prevent people accusing OFF of something he is not here to defend himself from.
Or do you just prefer to mindlessly abuse people?
It's ironic you get so worked up about me suggesting censorship may be a way to solve a problem raised by others and then you demand censorship of me (by banning me posting) for suggesting censorship
How hypocritical?
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 4:37 pm
Asking for the mods to reinstate the ban you received for breaking the board rules (and then continuing to break rules after your ban was lifted) is not “censorship”.spen666 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:34 pmSnowflake alertP&O wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:10 pmAfter your first two attempts to get a reaction on this thread failed miserably this is what you’re reduced to?
Absolutely staggering that not only did you manage to weasel out of a perma ban but escaped re-banning after being caught out breaking the rules again with multiple accounts.
I’m sure that your grovelling promise to the mods to behave after you avoided a repeat ban didn’t include sticking up for nonces and wumming on a thread about racism.
Have no idea what the mods are thinking letting you continuously break the rules without punishment.
Saying censorship is hardly Wumming.
It's a perfect description of what I was commenting on?
BTW before you threw you toys out of the pram with your rant, do you even know what I was referring to by the word "censorship"?
No, thought not
Censorship by moderators would prevent people accusing OFF of something he is not here to defend himself from.
Or do you just prefer to mindlessly abuse people?
It's ironic you get so worked up about me suggesting censorship may be a way to solve a problem raised by others and then you demand censorship of me (by banning me posting) for suggesting censorship
How hypocritical?
I suppose you think it was “censorship” when all the fake accounts you were using were shut down as well?
Why the mods decided to make you untouchable really is beyond me. It appears that no matter what rule you break you are able to get away with it.
Baffling.
Re: Statement from Nigel Travis
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 5:13 pm
Big statement yet the club have a 'proud' racist forking the pitch at half time.