Re: Ratings
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2024 8:25 am
One of the best blasteroonies I’ve seen from Happe in a long time.
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
One of the best blasteroonies I’ve seen from Happe in a long time.
I had brown as MOM as well. Joint with Kelman.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 9:19 am Hemming 1
Clare 6
Sweeney 6
Beckles 6
Happe 7
Brown 7 MOTM
Galbraith 7
Obeiro 7
ONeill 6
Kelman 7
Agyei 6
Subs
TJ 6
Perkins 1
DJ 4
Ok, let me have a rethink then and get back to you.Beradogs wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 9:49 amI had brown as MOM as well. Joint with Kelman.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 9:19 am Hemming 1
Clare 6
Sweeney 6
Beckles 6
Happe 7
Brown 7 MOTM
Galbraith 7
Obeiro 7
ONeill 6
Kelman 7
Agyei 6
Subs
TJ 6
Perkins 1
DJ 4
I couldn’t give 0, I’m not that much of an bumhole.
The goal literally came from our game plan.PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:18 am I’m not sure the ‘diamond’ midfield formation really worked.
I don’t think best use was made of O’Neill and I don’t think our midfield diamond fed Agyei/Kelman enough. Agyei was totally anonymous, swooped out for the even more anonymous Perkins. Our goal came when Happe totally bypassed the midfield and lumped it up to Kelman.
I think we need more width in the side, granted not helped by injuries to Graham and Theo out for yonks.
We’ve got some great young players but I think we need to get the best out of them, different set up and possibly need a bit more experience.
Plenty of things for RW to ponder over.
I thought our game plan was to press like crazy, the forward diamond player to be feeding Kelman & Agyei and the full backs to be bombing forwards? I thought that was how a ‘diamond’ was supposed to work?Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:39 amThe goal literally came from our game plan.PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:18 am I’m not sure the ‘diamond’ midfield formation really worked.
I don’t think best use was made of O’Neill and I don’t think our midfield diamond fed Agyei/Kelman enough. Agyei was totally anonymous, swooped out for the even more anonymous Perkins. Our goal came when Happe totally bypassed the midfield and lumped it up to Kelman.
I think we need more width in the side, granted not helped by injuries to Graham and Theo out for yonks.
We’ve got some great young players but I think we need to get the best out of them, different set up and possibly need a bit more experience.
Plenty of things for RW to ponder over.
I agree ONeill is the one player that doesn’t suit the diamond - his best moments came when he got out wide 1v1 in his favoured position - but it suits everyone else in the team. And ONeill seems a smart enough player to learn a new position in pretty short order
You make a good point imho. There is a reluctance to “ mix it up” and improvise a bit a times which I find a bit disconcerting. There is a fine line between adhering to a game plan and becoming stuck in a straight jacket playing wise.PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:59 amI thought our game plan was to press like crazy, the forward diamond player to be feeding Kelman & Agyei and the full backs to be bombing forwards? I thought that was how a ‘diamond’ was supposed to work?Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:39 amThe goal literally came from our game plan.PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:18 am I’m not sure the ‘diamond’ midfield formation really worked.
I don’t think best use was made of O’Neill and I don’t think our midfield diamond fed Agyei/Kelman enough. Agyei was totally anonymous, swooped out for the even more anonymous Perkins. Our goal came when Happe totally bypassed the midfield and lumped it up to Kelman.
I think we need more width in the side, granted not helped by injuries to Graham and Theo out for yonks.
We’ve got some great young players but I think we need to get the best out of them, different set up and possibly need a bit more experience.
Plenty of things for RW to ponder over.
I agree ONeill is the one player that doesn’t suit the diamond - his best moments came when he got out wide 1v1 in his favoured position - but it suits everyone else in the team. And ONeill seems a smart enough player to learn a new position in pretty short order
Not bypass midfield and lump it up front, but I sure ain’t complaining about the goal, great vision from Happe and Kelman took it beautifully, be happy with more like it. Let’s mix it up, great, but that goal didn’t come from a ‘diamond’, as the midfield wa irrelevant to the goal. If that’s our game plan, ie mix it up, then that’s all well and good and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a ‘bad’ Orient goal!
As for O’Neill, agree, I think he is going to be a great player for us and I’m sure is capable of doing anything asked of him.
That all goes out the window if your keeper gifts the opposition two goals .PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:59 amI thought our game plan was to press like crazy, the forward diamond player to be feeding Kelman & Agyei and the full backs to be bombing forwards? I thought that was how a ‘diamond’ was supposed to work?Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:39 amThe goal literally came from our game plan.PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:18 am I’m not sure the ‘diamond’ midfield formation really worked.
I don’t think best use was made of O’Neill and I don’t think our midfield diamond fed Agyei/Kelman enough. Agyei was totally anonymous, swooped out for the even more anonymous Perkins. Our goal came when Happe totally bypassed the midfield and lumped it up to Kelman.
I think we need more width in the side, granted not helped by injuries to Graham and Theo out for yonks.
We’ve got some great young players but I think we need to get the best out of them, different set up and possibly need a bit more experience.
Plenty of things for RW to ponder over.
I agree ONeill is the one player that doesn’t suit the diamond - his best moments came when he got out wide 1v1 in his favoured position - but it suits everyone else in the team. And ONeill seems a smart enough player to learn a new position in pretty short order
Not bypass midfield and lump it up front, but I sure ain’t complaining about the goal, great vision from Happe and Kelman took it beautifully, be happy with more like it. Let’s mix it up, great, but that goal didn’t come from a ‘diamond’, as the midfield wa irrelevant to the goal. If that’s our game plan, ie mix it up, then that’s all well and good and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a ‘bad’ Orient goal!
As for O’Neill, agree, I think he is going to be a great player for us and I’m sure is capable of doing anything asked of him.
You’ve totally misunderstood how we are setting up.PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:59 amI thought our game plan was to press like crazy, the forward diamond player to be feeding Kelman & Agyei and the full backs to be bombing forwards? I thought that was how a ‘diamond’ was supposed to work?Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:39 amThe goal literally came from our game plan.PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:18 am I’m not sure the ‘diamond’ midfield formation really worked.
I don’t think best use was made of O’Neill and I don’t think our midfield diamond fed Agyei/Kelman enough. Agyei was totally anonymous, swooped out for the even more anonymous Perkins. Our goal came when Happe totally bypassed the midfield and lumped it up to Kelman.
I think we need more width in the side, granted not helped by injuries to Graham and Theo out for yonks.
We’ve got some great young players but I think we need to get the best out of them, different set up and possibly need a bit more experience.
Plenty of things for RW to ponder over.
I agree ONeill is the one player that doesn’t suit the diamond - his best moments came when he got out wide 1v1 in his favoured position - but it suits everyone else in the team. And ONeill seems a smart enough player to learn a new position in pretty short order
Not bypass midfield and lump it up front, but I sure ain’t complaining about the goal, great vision from Happe and Kelman took it beautifully, be happy with more like it. Let’s mix it up, great, but that goal didn’t come from a ‘diamond’, as the midfield wa irrelevant to the goal. If that’s our game plan, ie mix it up, then that’s all well and good and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a ‘bad’ Orient goal!
As for O’Neill, agree, I think he is going to be a great player for us and I’m sure is capable of doing anything asked of him.
So we don’t need the diamond or any other shape in midfield then.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 3:37 pmYou’ve totally misunderstood how we are setting up.PKM wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:59 amI thought our game plan was to press like crazy, the forward diamond player to be feeding Kelman & Agyei and the full backs to be bombing forwards? I thought that was how a ‘diamond’ was supposed to work?Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 10:39 am
The goal literally came from our game plan.
I agree ONeill is the one player that doesn’t suit the diamond - his best moments came when he got out wide 1v1 in his favoured position - but it suits everyone else in the team. And ONeill seems a smart enough player to learn a new position in pretty short order
Not bypass midfield and lump it up front, but I sure ain’t complaining about the goal, great vision from Happe and Kelman took it beautifully, be happy with more like it. Let’s mix it up, great, but that goal didn’t come from a ‘diamond’, as the midfield wa irrelevant to the goal. If that’s our game plan, ie mix it up, then that’s all well and good and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a ‘bad’ Orient goal!
As for O’Neill, agree, I think he is going to be a great player for us and I’m sure is capable of doing anything asked of him.
We played long balls over the defence for both Kelman and Agyei all game.