Page 2 of 3

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 2:58 pm
by CEB
It’s relevant to whether or not Roy Keane is guilty of something else a quarter of a century later?

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:04 pm
by Proposition Joe
Guilty of something that a Court decided happened TO him.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:05 pm
by Give it to Jabo
If somebody has been charged with an offence, I believe it is customary for the powers that be to discover if anything is known of previous offences before a sentence is passed. I am not saying that Keane IS guilty in this case, btw. I simply thought that it was an interesting case worthy of discussion on this forum. It seems to have rattled a few cages, yours included.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:07 pm
by CEB
Roy Keane wasn’t charged with an offence.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:11 pm
by Give it to Jabo
Do you mean in this particular case?

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:12 pm
by Proposition Joe
Give it to Jabo wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:05 pm If somebody has been charged with an offence, I believe it is customary for the powers that be to discover if anything is known of previous offences before a sentence is passed. I am not saying that Keane IS guilty in this case, btw. I simply thought that it was an interesting case worthy of discussion on this forum. It seems to have rattled a few cages, yours included.
Who said it wasn't an interesting case? I just found your (and Sid's) ridiculous posts just as worthy of comment.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:13 pm
by Proposition Joe
Give it to Jabo wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:05 pm If somebody has been charged with an offence, I believe it is customary for the powers that be to discover if anything is known of previous offences before a sentence is passed.
Yeah, previous offences of the person CHARGED. They don't tend to drag through the victim's past when deciding on a sentence because that would be massively irrelevant.

"Well it was going to be 3 years but Keane got sent off once so we'll knock 6 months off because reasons".

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:14 pm
by CEB
Believe it or not, yes, I am referring to this particular case when replying to you pointing out - in response to mentions of Keane’s history of on field misdemeanours - that it’s customary to check someone’s past when they’re charged with an offence.
Why do you ask?

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:17 pm
by CEB
Proposition Joe wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:13 pm
Give it to Jabo wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:05 pm If somebody has been charged with an offence, I believe it is customary for the powers that be to discover if anything is known of previous offences before a sentence is passed.
Yeah, previous offences of the person CHARGED. They don't tend to drag through the victim's past when deciding on a sentence because that would be massively irrelevant.

"Well it was going to be 3 years but Keane got sent off once so we'll knock 6 months off because reasons".
Bit worried now that the yellow card I got in the 2007 Chaos Cup is gonna bite me on the arse when the bloke who stole my phone out of my hands is sentenced

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:18 pm
by Proposition Joe
CEB wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:17 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:13 pm
Give it to Jabo wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:05 pm If somebody has been charged with an offence, I believe it is customary for the powers that be to discover if anything is known of previous offences before a sentence is passed.
Yeah, previous offences of the person CHARGED. They don't tend to drag through the victim's past when deciding on a sentence because that would be massively irrelevant.

"Well it was going to be 3 years but Keane got sent off once so we'll knock 6 months off because reasons".
Bit worried now that the yellow card I got in the 2007 Chaos Cup is gonna bite me on the arse when the bloke who stole my phone out of my hands is sentenced
I'm afraid this is customary, unlucky.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:19 pm
by Give it to Jabo
Fair enough. What prompted me to post in the first place is that I felt a measure of pity for the accused - he was facing powerful, famous media personalities from the outset, which put him at something of a disadvantage. I am prepared to accept that Keane was the injured party in this case - I am not possession of all the relevant details, anyway.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:20 pm
by CEB
If you ask me it was selfish of media personalities to get themselves headbutted

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:26 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Give it to Jabo wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:19 pm Fair enough. What prompted me to post in the first place is that I felt a measure of pity for the accused - he was facing powerful, famous media personalities from the outset, which put him at something of a disadvantage. I am prepared to accept that Keane was the injured party in this case - I am not possession of all the relevant details, anyway.
what trollope. Retire from this thread. You clearly dont like Keane and you are letting that bias your opinion.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:28 pm
by Max B Gold
Can't believe everyone is saying Keane is innocent.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 3:51 pm
by Dunners
Keane was clearly wearing a metaphorical short skirt.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:17 pm
by BiggsyMalone
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 12:11 pm Anyone know why he wasn't arrested and charged for this?

Went for the ball

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:18 pm
by Brigs
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 12:11 pm Anyone know why he wasn't arrested and charged for this?

You know Halaand played 45 minutes for Norway 3 or 4 days later then played 68 minutes for Leeds the following Saturday.
I don't get what you wanted him arrested for?

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:22 pm
by BiggsyMalone
Brigs wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:18 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 12:11 pm Anyone know why he wasn't arrested and charged for this?

You know Halaand played 45 minutes for Norway 3 or 4 days later then played 68 minutes for Leeds the following Saturday.
I don't get what you wanted him arrested for?
People think the tackle ruined his career. Despite him retiring with an injury to his other leg.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:28 pm
by Brigs
BiggsyMalone wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:22 pm
Brigs wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:18 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 12:11 pm Anyone know why he wasn't arrested and charged for this?

You know Halaand played 45 minutes for Norway 3 or 4 days later then played 68 minutes for Leeds the following Saturday.
I don't get what you wanted him arrested for?
People think the tackle ruined his career. Despite him retiring with an injury to his other leg.
It's laughable isn't it.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:40 pm
by Give it to Jabo

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:45 pm
by Max B Gold
Looks like Keano is less innocent than he is claiming. Guys lucky he's not a cripple like Haaland.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 5:11 pm
by Proposition Joe
Looks like the aftermath rather than anything else.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 5:50 pm
by Max B Gold
The elbow is a straight red every day of the week.

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 6:15 pm
by CEB
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:45 pm Looks like Keano is less innocent than he is claiming. Guys lucky he's not a cripple like Haaland.

Have you considered the possibility that something may have happened before they entered the room?

Re: Roy Keane Innocent

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 6:36 pm
by Max B Gold
CEB wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 6:15 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 4:45 pm Looks like Keano is less innocent than he is claiming. Guys lucky he's not a cripple like Haaland.

Have you considered the possibility that something may have happened before they entered the room?
I'm restricting my comments to what I have actually seen but yeah sure Keano could have taken his legs when out of sight of the VAR cctv. Once a villain. Always a sly villain.