The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
No, I would have happily represented him at a trial if instructed.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:14 pm I mean, he's got a point.
Assume you mean you'd have defended Savile's right to a trial though, rather than er, actively defending him?
Defending nonces might be a “cornerstone” for you, but most of the general public will disagree with you.spen666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:08 pmI would indeed have defended Jimmy Saville if he had faced a trial.Fenners131 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:14 pmAs I said in my other comment, apply Spens “argument” to Saville. Same thing.
Let that sink in, Spen is the kind of bloke who would actively defend Saville.
Chillling.
That is my job and I am proud to do it.
Everyone has the right to a fair trial.
If you have the evidence that they are guilty, then why are you so upset at letting them gave a fair trial
The Nazis at Nuremberg were given a fair trial and had counsel representing them.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of which Britain was a prime mover recognised the right to a Fair Trial as does the European Convention on Human Rights.
It is one of the cornerstones of a free society
Hold up - were spen and Esteban the two that were constantly sniping at each other and permabanned?Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 6:05 pm How many times should someone create dummy email addresses and re-register on a lower league message board just to have a go at the same bloke before they ask themselves if it's healthy behaviour?
When a piece of Scum like Epstein uses the U.S constitution to get away withspen666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:08 pmI would indeed have defended Jimmy Saville if he had faced a trial.Fenners131 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:14 pmAs I said in my other comment, apply Spens “argument” to Saville. Same thing.
Let that sink in, Spen is the kind of bloke who would actively defend Saville.
Chillling.
That is my job and I am proud to do it.
Everyone has the right to a fair trial.
If you have the evidence that they are guilty, then why are you so upset at letting them gave a fair trial
The Nazis at Nuremberg were given a fair trial and had counsel representing them.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of which Britain was a prime mover recognised the right to a Fair Trial as does the European Convention on Human Rights.
It is one of the cornerstones of a free society
Fortunately we do not have trials in UK or USA based on random quotes from media.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 12:21 amWhen a piece of Scum like Epstein uses the U.S constitution to get away withspen666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:08 pmI would indeed have defended Jimmy Saville if he had faced a trial.Fenners131 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:14 pm
As I said in my other comment, apply Spens “argument” to Saville. Same thing.
Let that sink in, Spen is the kind of bloke who would actively defend Saville.
Chillling.
That is my job and I am proud to do it.
Everyone has the right to a fair trial.
If you have the evidence that they are guilty, then why are you so upset at letting them gave a fair trial
The Nazis at Nuremberg were given a fair trial and had counsel representing them.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of which Britain was a prime mover recognised the right to a Fair Trial as does the European Convention on Human Rights.
It is one of the cornerstones of a free society
Peadophilia , soliciting minors etc , then make sure you defend him without your SOUL spammy666 seems like the devil really has done a deal for your soul already.
But then most legals are a bit ropey when they can be
" The Miami Herald report prompted Nebraska senator Ben Sasse to prod the Justice Department to investigate the plea deal negotiated by Acosta. The deal, in which Epstein pleaded guilty to two state charges of soliciting prostitution from a minor, granted him and his potential accomplices immunity from federal charges. In February, the DOJ announced its inquiry into “allegations that Department attorneys may have committed professional misconduct in the manner in which the Epstein criminal matter was resolved.” Also in February, a U.S. district judge ruled that because prosecutors did not inform victims of the plea or provide the opportunity to testify about it, the deal violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act".
https://www.google.com/amp/nymag.com/in ... stein.html
Or worse you could be sat next to DisorientedFenners131 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 3:40 pmspen666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 3:34 pmWho is a convicted nonce in this case? No evidence had been presented at the time of his death.Fenners131 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2019 3:07 pm
Defending a convicted nonce? Pretty chilling to think about the kind of people you might be sitting next to at Brisbane Road.
He may or may not have done the acts alleged.
Everyone has a right to a fair trial irrespective of the crime alleged.
I think the time he was convicted of being a nonce back in 2008 qualifies him for the title convicted nonce.
But you carry on defending him, creep.
You’re probably one of those who bemoans that Saville can’t defend himself.
As I said, really chilling to think that I, or members of my family, could be sitting next to the likes of you at Brisbane Road.
The fact someone was convicted of an offence a decade ago does not mean they are guilty of the current allegationsCreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 8:44 am I know spen loves facts but he seems to be overlooking the one that this scumbag is a convicted nonce. Strange.
Do you even know what offence he was convicted of?CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 8:57 am Of course.
But he’s still a convicted nonce. Pretty sure that means it’s ok to call him a ‘monster’, even if it was such a long time ago.
If you are calling him all the names then at least you would know what he was convicted ofCreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:15 am What did he agree to let them charge him with in the end? Couple of counts of minor prostitution and trafficking?
Didn't they used to be really good mates. It's shameful that he should ditch him in his time of need.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 11:15 am If even Donald Trump starts trying to distance himself, you know he's a bad name.
Just because the pair of them used to have private parties with only themselves and 50 or so young girls does not mean they were ever good mates.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 11:29 amDidn't they used to be really good mates. It's shameful that he should ditch him in his time of need.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 11:15 am If even Donald Trump starts trying to distance himself, you know he's a bad name.
I see he's now grassing up the Clintons via Twitter assisted by the Russian Bots!!