Page 2 of 5

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 12:38 pm
by Dunners
"microaggressions" FFS. These people.


Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 12:41 pm
by Hoover Attack
Dunners wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 12:38 pm "microaggressions" FFS. These people.

What has yanked your chain now?

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 12:46 pm
by CEB
It would seem to me that the point is that mentioning “micro aggressions” in the context of an acid attack is deeply stupid

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 12:52 pm
by Dunners
Yep. And with the image of the cyclops as backdrop to the discussion too.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 12:57 pm
by CEB
If there’s an image that represented why the concept of “wokeness” is not simply about “wanting to make society better” but is instead about performative adherence to ostensibly progressive beliefs that demand nothing of the people discussing it, it’s talking about micro aggressions on newsnight against a background of a monstrous, acid burned violent mad man who committed an evil, violent crime after every safeguard we have failed utterly

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:13 pm
by Proposition Joe
If only someone had reminded him to hold the door open for the lady coming into the Halal butcher's after him, this would never have happened.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:19 pm
by Hoover Attack
You should all jump into the comments section of that tweet and give the Freds and others your support.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:22 pm
by Dunners
Hoover Attack wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:19 pm You should all jump into the comments section of that tweet and give the Freds and others your support.
How do you know we haven't?

Anyway, it's not just the Freds. It's even your Novara luvvies that agree.


Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:23 pm
by Dunners
(surely you didn't think I'd have not prepared my defence)

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:25 pm
by CEB
Hoover Attack wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:19 pm You should all jump into the comments section of that tweet and give the Freds and others your support.

Do you think micro aggressions are a useful prism through which to view this unfolding situation?

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:43 pm
by Hoover Attack
Dunners wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:22 pm
Hoover Attack wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:19 pm You should all jump into the comments section of that tweet and give the Freds and others your support.
How do you know we haven't?

Anyway, it's not just the Freds. It's even your Novara luvvies that agree.

Ah, you should have said earlier. In which case, THIS IS A DISCRACE, DEFUND THE BEEB!

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:48 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Friend or faux wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 8:37 am He's come from Afghanistan. He has converted to Christianity ( to aid granting of asylum?). In Afghanistan, conversion to Christianity = death sentence!
That was just a ruse to get asylum. Throwing acid around at a woman and children , I’d deport him back to Afghanistan.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:55 pm
by CEB
It’s a good point, we can’t have people throwing acid around

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:56 pm
by Friend or fart
CEB:-If there’s an image that represented why the concept of “wokeness” is not simply about “wanting to make society better” but is instead about performative adherence to ostensibly progressive beliefs that demand nothing of the people discussing it, it’s talking about micro aggressions on newsnight against a background of a monstrous, acid burned violent mad man who committed an evil, violent crime after every safeguard we have failed utterly

Friend or faux:- I see that you prefer to express your beliefs in good, plain simple English; so that everybody gets a grasp of your meaning.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 2:17 pm
by CEB
Let me know how many syllables you can handle and I’ll try to pitch my posts to your reading age x

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 4:11 pm
by Friend or fart
CEB :- I appreciate your thoughtfulness. I am 76 so pitch your comments at that age group. You don't happen to live in Paris do you ? Your ostentatious writing style reminds me of my ex-wife's brother. He went to Westminster, do you have a privileged background?

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 4:15 pm
by CEB
I have all the privileges one would expect of someone whose dad was a van driver and whose mum was a dinner lady x

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 4:29 pm
by Proposition Joe
Friend or faux wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 4:11 pm CEB :- I appreciate your thoughtfulness. I am 76 so pitch your comments at that age group. You don't happen to live in Paris do you ? Your ostentatious writing style reminds me of my ex-wife's brother. He went to Westminster, do you have a privileged background?
Not sure what your age has to do with it.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 4:40 pm
by Friend or fart
Preposterous Joe:- I am ignoring all your comments as you are a person who doesn't seem to believe that a person carrying out an act of aggression could also be carrying a weapon. At best you are naïve. Also by the way you are so "up" CEB, you are also probably CEB.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 4:44 pm
by Proposition Joe
I'm surprised at this response because I never said any such thing and you wet your pants last week about people "rewriting the written record" or some such rubbish.

So which is it, are you in favour of misrepresenting what people say or not?

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 5:12 pm
by Hoover Attack
CEB wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 4:15 pm I have all the privileges one would expect of someone whose dad was a van driver and whose mum was a dinner lady x
This sounds a bit Starmery to me…

What sort of van are we talking?

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 5:24 pm
by George M
Strange that as Europeans we are prevented from spending more than 90 days in Europe and yet this sex offending piece of s—t can stay in Europe as long as he likes.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 5:25 pm
by CEB
No, no, he was a van Driver, of the Texas van Drivers, who made their money in oil

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 6:08 pm
by Adz
In an early run for pedant of the year the article says it was an alkali attack, the base opposite of an acid.

Re: Clapham attack

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 6:17 pm
by StillSpike
George M wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 5:24 pm Strange that as Europeans we are prevented from spending more than 90 days in Europe and yet this sex offending piece of s—t can stay in Europe as long as he likes.
Strange indeed. I wonder how that came about.