Page 2 of 5
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2023 6:16 pm
by Hoover Attack
faldO wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:14 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:32 pm
I've looked at what he's said. You're attacking the BBC for it forcing an 'agenda' down your throat. Your evidence? A journalist criticising the BBC for not being progressive enough.
Sounds like they are walking the middle ground quite well.
Pushing an agenda (what I said) and "forcing an 'agenda' down your throat" (what you said) are two different things.
Nihal Arthanayake is a highly paid BBC journalist, and for him to say that his mental health is affected because all he sees is white people when he walks into work is unacceptable, whatever the context.
Not sure what the highly paid bit has to do with anything.
Why is what he said unacceptable? I just don't get you lot going all snowflakey over this.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2023 7:54 pm
by StillSpike
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 6:16 pm
faldO wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:14 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:32 pm
I've looked at what he's said. You're attacking the BBC for it forcing an 'agenda' down your throat. Your evidence? A journalist criticising the BBC for not being progressive enough.
Sounds like they are walking the middle ground quite well.
Pushing an agenda (what I said) and "forcing an 'agenda' down your throat" (what you said) are two different things.
Nihal Arthanayake is a highly paid BBC journalist, and for him to say that his mental health is affected because all he sees is white people when he walks into work is unacceptable, whatever the context.
Not sure what the highly paid bit has to do with anything.
Why is what he said unacceptable? I just don't get you lot going all snowflakey over this.
When that Gary Lineker upsets all the snowflakes they start wanging on about how much he earns, too.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:52 pm
by faldO
If Nihal Arthanayake is earning at least £150k a year but complaining that his mental health is suffering because of all the white people in his work place I'd suggest life perhaps isn't quite as bad as he makes out.
Just a hunch.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:01 pm
by Hoover Attack
What salary level immunises you from mental health problems?
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 6:32 am
by Dunners
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:01 pm
What salary level immunises you from mental health problems?
You'll know when you get there.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 9:26 am
by Hoover Attack
Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2023 6:32 am
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:01 pm
What salary level immunises you from mental health problems?
You'll know when you get there.
You have been hacked.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 9:35 am
by Dunners
Ah, I just realised that my comment could be interpreted as me implying that you have mental health issues.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2023 9:53 am
by Hoover Attack
I'm cool with that.
Suggesting I earn below that level is what has wound me up.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 8:34 am
by Dunners
LOL
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 8:49 am
by o-no
Dunners wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 8:34 am
LOL
It's not that AMAZING. A tiger riding a horse would be amazing.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 9:21 am
by Hoover Attack
Ha ha!
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:25 am
by RedDwarf 1881
Well that sums up the BBC perfectly . I rest my case .
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 12:30 pm
by faldO
The BBC have deleted a tweet that described Harvard President Claudine Gay as a "victim of campus culture wars" following her resignation for failing to condemn on-campus antisemitism and for plagiarism.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67869624
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 12:33 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
faldO wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 12:30 pm
The BBC have deleted a tweet that described Harvard President Claudine Gay as a "victim of campus culture wars" following her resignation for failing to condemn on-campus antisemitism and for plagiarism.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67869624
I noticed The Guardian use the phrase ‘measured response’ in describing Gay’s attempt to downplay anti-Semitism. Article has since been amended. Bizarre
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 12:36 pm
by Long slender neck
Guardian headline just said she resigned over plagiarism.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 12:55 pm
by Hoover Attack
The far right have been after her for some time.
How did they eventually get her out?
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 12:59 pm
by CEB
By the devious means of realising she’d done stuff that made her position untenable, and pressing the issue.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:43 pm
by Hoover Attack
Which stuff? The copying or the AS?
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:46 pm
by CEB
Both, obviously
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:47 pm
by Dunners
*I appreciate that I, of all people, am on very dodgy ground here.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:48 pm
by faldO
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 12:55 pm
The far right have been after her for some time.
How did they eventually get her out?
This was the catalyst, two of the three at the testimony hearing have now resigned.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... -testimony
Sad to see so many far right black academics on social media agreeing with the resignation decision.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:02 pm
by CEB
You don’t think black academics should object to plagiarism?
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:05 pm
by faldO
CEB wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:02 pm
You don’t think black academics should object to plagiarism?
Not the far right ones, no.
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:11 pm
by CEB
That’s a pretty bizarre comment in itself.
And seems to suggest that plagiarism, if addressed, should be addressed and highlighted only by the left? Is that your position? In which case, what happens when there isn’t much appetite from people to apply scrutiny to those they are allied with?
This kind of muddy thinking is exactly what leaves room for the right to not just claim the moral high ground on the initial actions, but to also point to the sulky evasiveness of those on the left who can’t acknowledge wrong doing or consequences for one of their own
Re: BBC Watch
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:16 pm
by faldO
CEB wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:11 pm
That’s a pretty bizarre comment in itself.
And seems to suggest that plagiarism, if addressed, should be addressed and highlighted only by the left? Is that your position? In which case, what happens when there isn’t much appetite from people to apply scrutiny to those they are allied with?
This kind of muddy thinking is exactly what leaves room for the right to not just claim the moral high ground on the initial actions, but to also point to the sulky evasiveness of those on the left who can’t acknowledge wrong doing or consequences for one of their own
It was a sardonic response to Hoover's comment. Sorry if it's caused any confusion on my position.