Page 2 of 2

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:50 pm
by Equaliser0
Frogger wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 7:54 pm Once we have sucked out the 10 billion gallons of oils from underneath the island, the Argies can have it back.
Is that ever going to start ?

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 9:23 pm
by Frogger
It’s been going on for years about 2010 according to the inter web, they have found some oil, mainly cod πŸ˜‚

While the sea is wet, Argentina will never own the Falkland Islands.

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 10:19 pm
by Equaliser0
Frogger wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 9:23 pm It’s been going on for years about 2010 according to the inter web, they have found some oil, mainly cod πŸ˜‚

While the sea is wet, Argentina will never own the Falkland Islands.
I thought Rockhopa were still searching for financial partnerships .

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 10:54 pm
by leebmx
Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 10:50 am Point 1 is not wrong. There was no indigenous population before European settlers arrived in 1764.
There were some indigenous people in Australia when Europeans turned up is maybe the mistake he is pointing out.

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 8:29 am
by Dunners
leebmx wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 10:54 pm
Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 10:50 am Point 1 is not wrong. There was no indigenous population before European settlers arrived in 1764.
There were some indigenous people in Australia when Europeans turned up is maybe the mistake he is pointing out.
If he is, then he's misunderstood my point.

Aboriginal people were the first colonisers of Australia. Europeans were the first colonisers of the Falklands.

Often, when we talk about European colonisation it is in terms of displacement of a prior population. That does not apply in the case of the Falklands.

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 8:56 am
by Type high
Frogger wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 7:54 pm Once we have sucked out the 10 billion gallons of oils from underneath the island, the Argies can have it back.
Wasn't theirs in the first place? So no one to give it back to, seems we're stuck with it

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 9:08 am
by RedDwarf 1881
Type high wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2023 8:56 am
Frogger wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 7:54 pm Once we have sucked out the 10 billion gallons of oils from underneath the island, the Argies can have it back.
Wasn't theirs in the first place? So no one to give it back to, seems we're stuck with it
Exactly . The Falklands was a UK territory before the nation of Argentina was even created .

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 9:08 am
by Friend or fart
The Falkland Isles are of no use to the British and a major drain on our already overstretched finances. However the fact that it is a British Colony off the coast of Argentina ( albeit many, many miles distant ), is a huge irritation and discomfort to the Argentines. Therefore we should do all within our powers, to maintain the status quo for eternity.

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 9:14 am
by RedDwarf 1881
Friend or faux wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2023 9:08 am The Falkland Isles are of no use to the British and a major drain on our already overstretched finances. However the fact that it is a British Colony off the coast of Argentina ( albeit many, many miles distant ), is a huge irritation and discomfort to the Argentines. Therefore we should do all within our powers, to maintain the status quo for eternity.
The people there had a referendum and voted something like 99% to stay with the UK . It is ours for eternity because that's what the people voted for . The only way that will ever change ,apart from WW3 is if the people there wish it to change . That will be their decision alone and not Argentina's.

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 10:44 am
by Equaliser0
Having lots of problems with supply issues & inflation , causing shortages of food choices , The 2 year budget from government has Β£20 million to play with .

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 6:02 pm
by The Mindsweep
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:37 pm
The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 7:49 am About time the correct name for the place is being recognised
Once again a disrespectful post on here to stir up the sh-t. Perhaps you should ask all the widows, service men that were injured in the conflict, I know drop Simon Western a text and tell him your views. Sort of post that tuffers or one of his close numptys would put on thereπŸ™Š
The loss of life on both sides was avoidable. The catalyst was of course the Argentinan Facist regime at the time, but if Thatcher had listened to reason, rather than her plummeting poll ratings, the loss wouldn't have happened. The USA, among others, were calling for restraint, however Thatcher saw the chance to change her fortunes and took it without a thought for needless slaughter of both British & Argentinan lives

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:18 pm
by Monkey Boy
The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 6:02 pm
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:37 pm
The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 7:49 am About time the correct name for the place is being recognised
Once again a disrespectful post on here to stir up the sh-t. Perhaps you should ask all the widows, service men that were injured in the conflict, I know drop Simon Western a text and tell him your views. Sort of post that tuffers or one of his close numptys would put on thereπŸ™Š
The loss of life on both sides was avoidable. The catalyst was of course the Argentinan Facist regime at the time, but if Thatcher had listened to reason, rather than her plummeting poll ratings, the loss wouldn't have happened. The USA, among others, were calling for restraint, however Thatcher saw the chance to change her fortunes and took it without a thought for needless slaughter of both British & Argentinan lives
Won’t argue about Thatcher and what a lot of people don’t
Necessarily realise that it was her government that was pulling the troops out of the Faulklanks just before they invaded and was negotiating sovereignty with the greasy Argentines. None the less people gave there live to keep it British and long may it continue as long as the inhabitants want it that way, no matter what the Argentinians want to call it or anyone else for that matter. It is the faulklandsπŸ™Š

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:35 pm
by Equaliser0
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:18 pm
The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 6:02 pm
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:37 pm

Once again a disrespectful post on here to stir up the sh-t. Perhaps you should ask all the widows, service men that were injured in the conflict, I know drop Simon Western a text and tell him your views. Sort of post that tuffers or one of his close numptys would put on thereπŸ™Š
The loss of life on both sides was avoidable. The catalyst was of course the Argentinan Facist regime at the time, but if Thatcher had listened to reason, rather than her plummeting poll ratings, the loss wouldn't have happened. The USA, among others, were calling for restraint, however Thatcher saw the chance to change her fortunes and took it without a thought for needless slaughter of both British & Argentinan lives
Won’t argue about Thatcher and what a lot of people don’t
Necessarily realise that it was her government that was pulling the troops out of the Faulklanks just before they invaded and was negotiating sovereignty with the greasy Argentines. None the less people gave there live to keep it British and long may it continue as long as the inhabitants want it that way, no matter what the Argentinians want to call it or anyone else for that matter. It is the faulklandsπŸ™Š
I Know we beat em in the war, but isnt " greasy Argentines" a bit over the top. Sounds a bit like the obssesed gender bloke speaking. [##]

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:08 pm
by Monkey Boy
Equaliser0 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:35 pm
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:18 pm
The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 6:02 pm

The loss of life on both sides was avoidable. The catalyst was of course the Argentinan Facist regime at the time, but if Thatcher had listened to reason, rather than her plummeting poll ratings, the loss wouldn't have happened. The USA, among others, were calling for restraint, however Thatcher saw the chance to change her fortunes and took it without a thought for needless slaughter of both British & Argentinan lives
Won’t argue about Thatcher and what a lot of people don’t
Necessarily realise that it was her government that was pulling the troops out of the Faulklanks just before they invaded and was negotiating sovereignty with the greasy Argentines. None the less people gave there live to keep it British and long may it continue as long as the inhabitants want it that way, no matter what the Argentinians want to call it or anyone else for that matter. It is the faulklandsπŸ™Š
I Know we beat em in the war, but isnt " greasy Argentines" a bit over the top. Sounds a bit like the obssesed gender bloke speaking. [##]
Umm maybe how about dodgy?πŸ™Š

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:26 pm
by Equaliser0
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:08 pm
Equaliser0 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:35 pm
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:18 pm

Won’t argue about Thatcher and what a lot of people don’t
Necessarily realise that it was her government that was pulling the troops out of the Faulklanks just before they invaded and was negotiating sovereignty with the greasy Argentines. None the less people gave there live to keep it British and long may it continue as long as the inhabitants want it that way, no matter what the Argentinians want to call it or anyone else for that matter. It is the faulklandsπŸ™Š
I Know we beat em in the war, but isnt " greasy Argentines" a bit over the top. Sounds a bit like the obssesed gender bloke speaking. [##]
Umm maybe how about dodgy?πŸ™Š
Very acceptable , Much less shouty angry bloke.

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:38 pm
by Monkey Boy
Equaliser0 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:26 pm
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:08 pm
Equaliser0 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:35 pm

I Know we beat em in the war, but isnt " greasy Argentines" a bit over the top. Sounds a bit like the obssesed gender bloke speaking. [##]
Umm maybe how about dodgy?πŸ™Š
Very acceptable , Much less shouty angry bloke.
Cheers just hope I can hold it together when the season startsπŸ€­πŸ™Š

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:42 pm
by Equaliser0
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:38 pm
Equaliser0 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:26 pm
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:08 pm

Umm maybe how about dodgy?πŸ™Š
Very acceptable , Much less shouty angry bloke.
Cheers just hope I can hold it together when the season startsπŸ€­πŸ™Š
I Have a good feeling about the season ahead

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 9:11 pm
by Monkey Boy
Equaliser0 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:42 pm
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:38 pm
Equaliser0 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 8:26 pm

Very acceptable , Much less shouty angry bloke.
Cheers just hope I can hold it together when the season startsπŸ€­πŸ™Š
I Have a good feeling about the season ahead
πŸ€žπŸ™Š

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 11:11 pm
by BIGRON
Therefore we should do all within our powers, to maintain the status quo for eternity.
[/quote]

Status Quo , now your talking , ' rocking all over the world '

Re: Islas Malvinas

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2023 8:58 am
by Monkey Boy
Ok what ever you want Ron as long as we don’t break the rules and go deeper and down the league and end up in the dust pipe or even worse in the army now so I’m going to wonderer offπŸ€ͺπŸ™ˆ