Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:44 pm
Is that supposed to insult me? You’re a strange manLucky7 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:39 pmLolif you say so Biggles
Independent Leyton Orient Forum
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
The Ling Haters
Page 2 of 2
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:47 pm
I thought Wright did well today, tidy in his distribution and kept the game flowing, also scored a goal, one of the few Orient players who actually had the bottle to take a shot !! Judd versus Ling, well Judd of the first half of last season was really good, played so well with Dayton in front of him. After Judd got injured, he was out the team for a long time. Since he has been back, his form has not yet got back to where he was pre-injury. When fit and on form, I.M.O Judd is a better attacking fullback than Ling. Turley is out injured at present, when fit again, he may be the number one choice for the right back position.Top of the West. wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:31 pm Bishops Stortford Manager at half time Tuesday to his team (clearly audible from the corridor outside the changing rooms)
Get at their F****** full backs they are ****. They did and tbf both full backs Judd and Sweeney were awful, Sweeney i can forgive with very limited experience and put under a lot of pressure he struggled to cope but Judd got turned inside out and looked like he had rarely played there before absolutely nothing "exciting" about his play.
Today was as good a 45 minutes I have seen from Sam Ling excellent defending, constantly got forward and put some good balls into the box. As I said in an earlier post going into pre season I thought Judd should start but oN the evidence I have seen in pre season Ling fully deserves to start.
Pretty obvious that Ling and Wright will be scape goated this season. If things don't start well.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:03 pm
You converse constantly with some one who does.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:24 pmThe saplings got Dutch Elm disease long ago fella.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 8:43 pmWell if you stopped planting so many saplings, the trees & woods would be visibleDisoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 8:35 pm
Poor show Fella. You can’t distinguish genuine criticism from hatred? Both Prez and I have stated many times there is no agenda against anyone. Pity you can’t see the wood for the trees.
quite easily. Pity you cant see that a decent young kid is being tainted by some who think
he only gets a game because of ................ utter nause by those who spout such views.
I have never brought up the subject of nepotism by the way.
If you think slating a guy who has family connections isnt going to lead to those who will , you are a bigger joke than i thought.
Nepotism lies very close to Corruption
in my view . Id be ashamed to associate myself with a club who are corrupt in any shape or form .
Please refrain from egging your co-horts in the ling hating club from this sort of nonsense.
Some seem to think you are a fan of importance .
And will indeed cosy up to you.
Show them you are indeed not suggesting anything like that.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 6:56 am
Converse? This is a message board fella, not a family dining table gathering.
Egging on? Don’t make me laugh. The only ‘egging’ going on is you ‘over-egging’ your non-existent argument.
Corruption? Focus instead on cycling and try challenging views on the Le Tour thread rather than ‘conversing’ with people there.
Nonsense? Yes, this whole thread is nonsense. The inability of fragile, narrow-minded boarders to understand or respect anyone else’s point of view is staggering, as is their lack of intelligence in categorising mild criticism as a vendetta.
Show them you are indeed not suggesting anything like that.
Egging on? Don’t make me laugh. The only ‘egging’ going on is you ‘over-egging’ your non-existent argument.
Corruption? Focus instead on cycling and try challenging views on the Le Tour thread rather than ‘conversing’ with people there.
Nonsense? Yes, this whole thread is nonsense. The inability of fragile, narrow-minded boarders to understand or respect anyone else’s point of view is staggering, as is their lack of intelligence in categorising mild criticism as a vendetta.
Show them you are indeed not suggesting anything like that.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:14 pm
Claiming a player is only playing or even on a wage , is because of nepotism
Is just not true.
You along with others keep stating it.
You keep accusing LOFC of being underhand in there buisness.
Why you have such HATRED for either of the LINGS employed by LOFC
would be interesting to know..
I doubt you to be a brave enough Human Being to explain your own inadequacies.
Is just not true.
You along with others keep stating it.
You keep accusing LOFC of being underhand in there buisness.
Why you have such HATRED for either of the LINGS employed by LOFC
would be interesting to know..
I doubt you to be a brave enough Human Being to explain your own inadequacies.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:23 pm
It’s not about hate, a stupid word to use. It’s about people forming an opinion based on past experience. Let’s face it, Alabi had a good 45 minutes in a friendly but that done mean he should start ahead of others.
Different people see different things and based on past performances Judd is the better player in my opinion.
If Ling gets the nod, I am sure he will, I hope he performs magnificently and puts to bed this whole debate. The last thing any of us want is teams targeting him as our weak link. No doubt Judds confidence will take a knock but that’s life. Time will tell.
Different people see different things and based on past performances Judd is the better player in my opinion.
If Ling gets the nod, I am sure he will, I hope he performs magnificently and puts to bed this whole debate. The last thing any of us want is teams targeting him as our weak link. No doubt Judds confidence will take a knock but that’s life. Time will tell.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:33 pm
Why are you getting personal? It demeans you considerably.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:14 pm Claiming a player is only playing or even on a wage , is because of nepotism
Is just not true.
You along with others keep stating it.
You keep accusing LOFC of being underhand in there buisness.
Why you have such HATRED for either of the LINGS employed by LOFC
would be interesting to know..
I doubt you to be a brave enough Human Being to explain your own inadequacies.
Prez is entitled to his opinion - get over it.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:54 pm
An opinion on someone being rubbish i have no problem with.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:33 pmWhy are you getting personal? It demeans you considerably.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:14 pm Claiming a player is only playing or even on a wage , is because of nepotism
Is just not true.
You along with others keep stating it.
You keep accusing LOFC of being underhand in there buisness.
Why you have such HATRED for either of the LINGS employed by LOFC
would be interesting to know..
I doubt you to be a brave enough Human Being to explain your own inadequacies.
Prez is entitled to his opinion - get over it.
Having people call out Leyton Orient for CORRUPTION
By continually stating Nepotism as a reason for a player
being picked is Vile & the lowest form of support .
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:57 pm
Nobody has said that. You’re making things up now and stewing for an argument.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:54 pmAn opinion on someone being rubbish i have no problem with.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:33 pmWhy are you getting personal? It demeans you considerably.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:14 pm Claiming a player is only playing or even on a wage , is because of nepotism
Is just not true.
You along with others keep stating it.
You keep accusing LOFC of being underhand in there buisness.
Why you have such HATRED for either of the LINGS employed by LOFC
would be interesting to know..
I doubt you to be a brave enough Human Being to explain your own inadequacies.
Prez is entitled to his opinion - get over it.
Having people call out Leyton Orient for CORRUPTION
By continually stating Nepotism as a reason for a player
being picked is Vile & the lowest form of support .
Unnecessary.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:23 pm
Ignore him. He’s an attention seeker who doesn’t believe or understand what he writes and thinks he’s better at arguing than he is.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:57 pmNobody has said that. You’re making things up now and stewing for an argument.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:54 pmAn opinion on someone being rubbish i have no problem with.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:33 pm
Why are you getting personal? It demeans you considerably.
Prez is entitled to his opinion - get over it.
Having people call out Leyton Orient for CORRUPTION
By continually stating Nepotism as a reason for a player
being picked is Vile & the lowest form of support .
Unnecessary.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:25 pm
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1243Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:57 pmNobody has said that. You’re making things up now and stewing for an argument.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:54 pmAn opinion on someone being rubbish i have no problem with.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:33 pm
Why are you getting personal? It demeans you considerably.
Prez is entitled to his opinion - get over it.
Having people call out Leyton Orient for CORRUPTION
By continually stating Nepotism as a reason for a player
being picked is Vile & the lowest form of support .
Unnecessary.
You seem to be rather selective in what you think you have said Dis
Opening post on the Judd Haters thread.
"Only 2 things injuries & the wrong genes ".
I can trawl through other posts if you want me to show you all the other claims of corruption through nepotism made by you or anyone else..
Im not looking for an argument
Im trying to defend the Football club i & many others love from attack by so called fans.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:31 pm
Good luck with your crusade.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:25 pmviewtopic.php?f=3&t=1243Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:57 pmNobody has said that. You’re making things up now and stewing for an argument.
Unnecessary.
You seem to be rather selective in what you think you have said Dis
Opening post on the Judd Haters thread.
"Only 2 things injuries & the wrong genes ".
I can trawl through other posts if you want me to show you all the other claims of corruption through nepotism made by you or anyone else..
Im not looking for an argument
Im trying to defend the Football club i & many others love from attack by so called fans.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:32 pm
Thanks Biggsy. That is exactly what I am going to do.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:23 pmIgnore him. He’s an attention seeker who doesn’t believe or understand what he writes and thinks he’s better at arguing than he is.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:57 pmNobody has said that. You’re making things up now and stewing for an argument.
Unnecessary.
Re: The Ling Haters
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:42 pm
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:32 pmThanks Biggsy. That is exactly what I am going to do.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:23 pmIgnore him. He’s an attention seeker who doesn’t believe or understand what he writes and thinks he’s better at arguing than he is.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:57 pm
Nobody has said that. You’re making things up now and stewing for an argument.
Unnecessary.
