The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Provided the player wants to sign it. He knows there's interest from higher up now and being out of contract brings sign-on bonuses. No doubt the agent is already working out how to maximise their earnings tooPoundhillO wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:49 amOf course the logical way round it is to offer him a better extended contact with a an extremely high buy out clause or no buy out clause at all .
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, so do one you predictably boring d*ckhead
Your first comment is a false dichotomy, but given we have rejected bids for Ekpiteta building a team is the more accurate of the two. Stop getting your knickers in a twist.PoundhillO wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:06 am Are we building a team or selling off yet more of the clubs silverware.The club have got enough money already from the sale of Bonne and Koroma, it’s time to spend some on more quality in attack and midfield, not sell off yet more of our players !!
Congratulations on being living proof that you can’t argue with stupid.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:48 amA wrong guess. Other clubs understand the process. Put in a high release clause for when a player is under contract makes business sense.Kitch’s Magic Toes wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:46 amThe people who would rather we got a fee for players than lose them on a free when they would otherwise not sign new contracts? Just a guess.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:07 am Great - another talent about to be sold for peanuts? Who in our club agrees to obscenely low release clauses?
KMT
That is exactly the case. A contract is two way and if we try to put an unreasonable release clause in place the player simply would not sign it. The eventually go for free. Why do people think the club can set the rules. Players have brains and agents looking after them and not the club. The club doesn’t hold all the cards.Red_Army wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:56 amWhy don't you understand this? They wouldn't sign the contract if that was the case.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:48 amA wrong guess. Other clubs understand the process. Put in a high release clause for when a player is under contract makes business sense.Kitch’s Magic Toes wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:46 am
The people who would rather we got a fee for players than lose them on a free when they would otherwise not sign new contracts? Just a guess.
KMT
You quote yourself as you stick to your own narrow dogma and don’t have the intelligence to grasp the obvious.Kitch’s Magic Toes wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 2:19 pmCongratulations on being living proof that you can’t argue with stupid.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:48 amA wrong guess. Other clubs understand the process. Put in a high release clause for when a player is under contract makes business sense.Kitch’s Magic Toes wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:46 am
The people who would rather we got a fee for players than lose them on a free when they would otherwise not sign new contracts? Just a guess.
KMT
KMT
Good one.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 4:55 pmYou quote yourself as you stick to your own narrow dogma and don’t have the intelligence to grasp the obvious.
Uncalled forKitch’s Magic Toes wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:24 pmGood one.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 4:55 pmYou quote yourself as you stick to your own narrow dogma and don’t have the intelligence to grasp the obvious.
By the way, even DohO gets it.
KMT
Who in our club gives you this information?Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:07 am Great - another talent about to be sold for peanuts? Who in our club agrees to obscenely low release clauses?
I have my source - the same one who assured me Simpson was coming way before he did.O my gawd wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:50 pmWho in our club gives you this information?Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:07 am Great - another talent about to be sold for peanuts? Who in our club agrees to obscenely low release clauses?
Let's be honest, you know as little as the rest of us on the subject of bids for peanuts & obscene clauses
Agreed. This fella seems to be hellbent on stepping on toes as a board newbie. Let’s face it though Prez, this could be fun.dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:42 pmUncalled forKitch’s Magic Toes wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:24 pmGood one.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 4:55 pmYou quote yourself as you stick to your own narrow dogma and don’t have the intelligence to grasp the obvious.
By the way, even DohO gets it.
KMT
Simpson was no secret was he, he was training with the club in December. He signed in the end because no one else would have him.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 7:23 pmI have my source - the same one who assured me Simpson was coming way before he did.O my gawd wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:50 pmWho in our club gives you this information?Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:07 am Great - another talent about to be sold for peanuts? Who in our club agrees to obscenely low release clauses?
Let's be honest, you know as little as the rest of us on the subject of bids for peanuts & obscene clauses
Is it Sam Ling DISenchanted?Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 7:23 pmI have my source - the same one who assured me Simpson was coming way before he did.O my gawd wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:50 pmWho in our club gives you this information?Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:07 am Great - another talent about to be sold for peanuts? Who in our club agrees to obscenely low release clauses?
Let's be honest, you know as little as the rest of us on the subject of bids for peanuts & obscene clauses
Shame he didnt tell ya he was going to be absolute kak this timeDisoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 7:23 pmI have my source - the same one who assured me Simpson was coming way before he did.O my gawd wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:50 pmWho in our club gives you this information?Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:07 am Great - another talent about to be sold for peanuts? Who in our club agrees to obscenely low release clauses?
Let's be honest, you know as little as the rest of us on the subject of bids for peanuts & obscene clauses
Very true Tuffers.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 8:02 pmShame he didnt tell ya he was going to be absolute kak this timeDisoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 7:23 pmI have my source - the same one who assured me Simpson was coming way before he did.
We could have saved the money & or got someone else.
And it’s my kind of fun. Bring it on baby. Let’s dance.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 7:24 pmAgreed. This fella seems to be hellbent on stepping on toes as a board newbie. Let’s face it though Prez, this could be fun.
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 8:35 pmAnd it’s my kind of fun. Bring it on baby. Let’s dance.Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 7:24 pmAgreed. This fella seems to be hellbent on stepping on toes as a board newbie. Let’s face it though Prez, this could be fun.