Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).
Who knows? Jackett has said he had no choice with the muppets that came here in January, it was them or nothing. They were the best Ling could dredge up.
I’m not so fussed about Kelman, so long as Smith and Drinnan aren’t out for much longer which were told will be the case. He’s here to fill a short term gap and will then be behind Drinna and Smith in the pecking order.
But the boy in midfield had better be the real deal. He should be here to start games ………
Hold on a second . Ling and Nigel both said they were Kenny's choices .
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:57 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Long slender neck wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:12 pm
Obviously has something about him to get a long contract at QPR.
That's at Championship level . He might be OK at League Two level. We'll have to wait and see for the answer to that .
LittleMate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:45 pm
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).
Who knows? Jackett has said he had no choice with the muppets that came here in January, it was them or nothing. They were the best Ling could dredge up.
I’m not so fussed about Kelman, so long as Smith and Drinnan aren’t out for much longer which were told will be the case. He’s here to fill a short term gap and will then be behind Drinna and Smith in the pecking order.
But the boy in midfield had better be the real deal. He should be here to start games ………
Hold on a second . Ling and Nigel both said they were Kenny's choices .
LittleMate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:45 pm
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).
Who knows? Jackett has said he had no choice with the muppets that came here in January, it was them or nothing. They were the best Ling could dredge up.
I’m not so fussed about Kelman, so long as Smith and Drinnan aren’t out for much longer which were told will be the case. He’s here to fill a short term gap and will then be behind Drinna and Smith in the pecking order.
But the boy in midfield had better be the real deal. He should be here to start games ………
Hold on a second . Ling and Nigel both said they were Kenny's choices .
They were lying
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:04 am
by Type high
Kelman has the making of another Drinan in him and not just by looks. I gotta good feeling about this. It's been a long time since we've had so much firepower in the forward line
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2022 3:37 am
by Adz
Interesting interview, and gives a small insight into how things work. QPR approached at the start of the pre-season. They want to see how he goes through it, then they offer him the chance to move (assume they tell him he's unlikely to feature in the first team). Perhaps this will help some realise that it takes time to get the players you want in.
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2022 9:01 am
by Max Fowler
Good looking lad, cracking jawline
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:10 pm
by EliotNes
Calling all you statisticians and suchlike out there, who was the last loanee to score 3 goals in his first 5 starts for the Os?
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:16 pm
by Max Fowler
He’s even better looking IMO after all these goals
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:17 pm
by BIGRON
I wonder if he might get called back sometime soon if he continues to shine
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:20 pm
by B.whitehouse+10more
BIGRON wrote: ↑Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:17 pm
I wonder if he might get called back sometime soon if he continues to shine
So what are the terms of his loan agreement then Ron ?
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:25 pm
by Mstevens1959
Unbelievable yesterday.
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 9:38 pm
by MrB
EliotNes wrote: ↑Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:10 pm
Calling all you statisticians and suchlike out there, who was the last loanee to score 3 goals in his first 5 starts for the Os?
I’ll go Ryan Jarvis when first on loan from Norwich?
EliotNes wrote: ↑Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:10 pm
Calling all you statisticians and suchlike out there, who was the last loanee to score 3 goals in his first 5 starts for the Os?
I’ll go Ryan Jarvis when first on loan from Norwich?
That's a great shout.
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 9:48 pm
by Loyal_Supporter
EliotNes wrote: ↑Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:10 pm
Calling all you statisticians and suchlike out there, who was the last loanee to score 3 goals in his first 5 starts for the Os?
Were the two new young loanee’s Richie’s choices ? If so fair enough. In Richie we trust.
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).
Who knows? Jackett has said he had no choice with the muppets that came here in January, it was them or nothing. They were the best Ling could dredge up.
I’m not so fussed about Kelman, so long as Smith and Drinnan aren’t out for much longer which were told will be the case. He’s here to fill a short term gap and will then be behind Drinna and Smith in the pecking order.
But the boy in midfield had better be the real deal. He should be here to start games ………
Oh dear hilarious …..some of the so called experts on here
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:47 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
BIGRON wrote: ↑Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:17 pm
I wonder if he might get called back sometime soon if he continues to shine
Talking to a QPR supporting mate of mine at work yesterday and he thought Kelman really struggled at Championship level . Whatever happens he would be better off staying with us anyway for the entire season . Better for Charlie and very good for us .
BIGRON wrote: ↑Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:17 pm
I wonder if he might get called back sometime soon if he continues to shine
Talking to a QPR supporting mate of mine at work yesterday and he thought Kelman really struggled at Championship level . Whatever happens he would be better off staying with us anyway for the entire season . Better for Charlie and very good for us .
His goal scoring record before us (@QPR & Gillingham) was poor for a striker. Richie must have been altered to his ability and wanted him in the building. Kelman (like Idris and like Theo before him) needs a good playing run to prove himself at this level. I think everyone concerned appreciates this and so unless he has an incredible number by xmas (and there's a call back clause) then he's here for the season.
PS. Then man we saw Saturday was light years away from the one that played at Crawley IMO. The fitness and sharpness, as well as the familiarity of whats expected from him, is very noticeable.
BIGRON wrote: ↑Sun Aug 28, 2022 7:17 pm
I wonder if he might get called back sometime soon if he continues to shine
Talking to a QPR supporting mate of mine at work yesterday and he thought Kelman really struggled at Championship level . Whatever happens he would be better off staying with us anyway for the entire season . Better for Charlie and very good for us .
His goal scoring record before us (@QPR & Gillingham) was poor for a striker. Richie must have been altered to his ability and wanted him in the building. Kelman (like Idris and like Theo before him) needs a good playing run to prove himself at this level. I think everyone concerned appreciates this and so unless he has an incredible number by xmas (and there's a call back clause) then he's here for the season.
PS. Then man we saw Saturday was light years away from the one that played at Crawley IMO. The fitness and sharpness, as well as the familiarity of whats expected from him, is very noticeable.
Think it probably helped him that Hartlepool had a poor back 4 and the left back particularly struggled with Kelman in the first half. I think he offers more than Harry Smith as he looks far quicker and sharper.
He’s certainly started well and long May it continue.
Who knows? Jackett has said he had no choice with the muppets that came here in January, it was them or nothing. They were the best Ling could dredge up.
I’m not so fussed about Kelman, so long as Smith and Drinnan aren’t out for much longer which were told will be the case. He’s here to fill a short term gap and will then be behind Drinna and Smith in the pecking order.
But the boy in midfield had better be the real deal. He should be here to start games ………
Hold on a second . Ling and Nigel both said they were Kenny's choices .
LittleMate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 9:45 pm
If they were not meet with Richie's approval then he would not have them. He would rather work with nothing than be forced into something he doesn't want. He's done that sort of thing before and regretted it (spoke about that kind of stuff at MTM).
Who knows? Jackett has said he had no choice with the muppets that came here in January, it was them or nothing. They were the best Ling could dredge up.
I’m not so fussed about Kelman, so long as Smith and Drinnan aren’t out for much longer which were told will be the case. He’s here to fill a short term gap and will then be behind Drinna and Smith in the pecking order.
But the boy in midfield had better be the real deal. He should be here to start games ………
Oh dear hilarious …..some of the so called experts on here
Love it.
Re: Charlie Kelman
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 6:27 am
by Beradogs
Can we take a moment to appreciate the header that set up Ruel for the fourth goal. Unbelievably difficult bit of skill.
