Independent Leyton Orient Forum

RedO wrote: ↑Sat May 16, 2020 12:07 pm A number they can spout off without being challenged. Nice.

They? Why would Cambridge University school of clinical medicine or any other medical/clinical organisation spout off.They are experts in the field of medicine and medical analysis.

Interesting article in today's Mail in a Sunday, suggesting the virus didn't come from Wuhan market but was man made.
I posted a couple of months back, that I thought it was man made.
This study doesn't validate that theory, but it suggests I may have been right
Anyway it's an interesting read
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... arket.html

ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 11:02 am Interesting article in today's Mail in a Sunday, suggesting the virus didn't come from Wuhan market but was man made.
I posted a couple of months back, that I thought it was man made.
This study doesn't validate that theory, but it suggests I may have been right
Anyway it's an interesting read
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... arket.html

Of course it's man made! 5G masts don't grow naturally

ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 11:02 am Interesting article in today's Mail in a Sunday, suggesting the virus didn't come from Wuhan market but was man made.
I posted a couple of months back, that I thought it was man made.
This study doesn't validate that theory, but it suggests I may have been right
Anyway it's an interesting read
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... arket.html

I mean, who knows. Daily Mail, agendas by researchers, writers etc.

But there seems to be a repeat thing with you - highlighting something you said weeks/months ago in a post and then stating or suggesting you were right back then. Good for you for suggesting this months back - but you weren't alone and it's hardly sticking your neck out to claim something like this, is it? You could have just posted the link and your first sentence and left the self indulgence afterwards out, but you seem to have an obsession with being right.

I'm interested to see if you also be putting up "I posted a few months ago about xyz and I was wrong" posts too, as haven't seen any of those.

Top of the JES wrote: ↑Sat May 16, 2020 1:01 pm

RedO wrote: ↑Sat May 16, 2020 12:07 pm A number they can spout off without being challenged. Nice.

They? Why would Cambridge University school of clinical medicine or any other medical/clinical organisation spout off.They are experts in the field of medicine and medical analysis.

They have come up with an alert system calculated on the rate of infection + number of infections and get a number that is less than 5. And you trust the numbers being pumped at us?

RedO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 11:37 am

Top of the JES wrote: ↑Sat May 16, 2020 1:01 pm

RedO wrote: ↑Sat May 16, 2020 12:07 pm A number they can spout off without being challenged. Nice.

They? Why would Cambridge University school of clinical medicine or any other medical/clinical organisation spout off.They are experts in the field of medicine and medical analysis.

They have come up with an alert system calculated on the rate of infection + number of infections and get a number that is less than 5. And you trust the numbers being pumped at us?

You seem to be an expert in this field what system do you suggest instead? Let me know and I will contact the scientists and professors who have come up with the system currently being used and tell them they are wrong.

Gone early with the ‘Are you a pro footballer manager? No, so shut up!’ line.

But also, basic maths.

'Virus did NOT come from animals in Wuhan market', landmark study claims as Beijing thwarts global efforts to establish the source of Covid-19.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/coronavi ... spartanntp

Lovejoy wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 4:33 pm 'Virus did NOT come from animals in Wuhan market', landmark study claims as Beijing thwarts global efforts to establish the source of Covid-19.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/coronavi ... spartanntp

Yes, that was already posted a few above.

170 deaths in today's update, with the usual caveat about Sunday figures being lower. Six drugs to combat Covid-19 have proceeded to clinical tests

In two weeks time, if the trend continues daily deaths should be in double figures.

Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 5:35 pm In two weeks time, if the trend continues daily deaths should be in double figures.

A pub in Goswell road North London is selling takeaway beer which is allowed , the people sitting outside drinking it is not allowed and wont keep the figures down police haven't intervened yet which is a bit of a concern

BIGRON wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 8:23 pm

Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 5:35 pm In two weeks time, if the trend continues daily deaths should be in double figures.

A pub in Goswell road North London is selling takeaway beer which is allowed , the people sitting outside drinking it is not allowed and wont keep the figures down police haven't intervened yet which is a bit of a concern

Expect to see a New Licensee soon

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 8:37 pm

BIGRON wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 8:23 pm

Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 5:35 pm In two weeks time, if the trend continues daily deaths should be in double figures.

A pub in Goswell road North London is selling takeaway beer which is allowed , the people sitting outside drinking it is not allowed and wont keep the figures down police haven't intervened yet which is a bit of a concern

Expect to see a New Licensee soon

Hope so mate , and fines for the drinkers .

Why? This virus has turned many people into curtain twitching Nazis.

Nothing to do with the virus. I've been one for ages.

Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 8:54 pm Why? This virus has turned many people into curtain twitching Nazis.

Do you think people should just ignore the advice given then ??

No

Stay indoors people.

HeyO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:12 pm Stay indoors people.

Why?

faldO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:16 pm

HeyO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:12 pm Stay indoors people.

Why?

To stay safe.

Safer outdoors

HeyO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:16 pm

faldO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:16 pm

HeyO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:12 pm Stay indoors people.

Why?

To stay safe.

Welcome to the new "Project Fear" - whipped up in in a large part by the media.

I do not agree with the people being at the pub mentioned above - whilst there are instructions not to do that, people should abide by them.

But statistically, the likelihood of catching covid-19 by just by walking around outdoors is negligible. You'd have to walk past a few hundred people at least, and have one of them cough or similar just as you walked past, and be close enough to them to breath it in.

I guess it depends what you do outdoors. Walking around on your own is probably fine, going to a busy location and touching stuff - not so much.

I think you're less likely to come into contact with an infected surface if you're indoors in your own home with your own family and you have some element of control over who comes and goes, and what precautions everyone is taking - so being indoors is probably at the safer end of things.

That's not project fear - just common sense.

faldO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:45 pm

HeyO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:16 pm

faldO wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 10:16 pm

Why?

To stay safe.

Welcome to the new "Project Fear" - whipped up in in a large part by the media.

I do not agree with the people being at the pub mentioned above - whilst there are instructions not to do that, people should abide by them.

But statistically, the likelihood of catching covid-19 by just by walking around outdoors is negligible. You'd have to walk past a few hundred people at least, and have one of them cough or similar just as you walked past, and be close enough to them to breath it in.

Project Staying Alive