Page 91 of 342

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu May 07, 2020 5:24 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Notting Hill Carnival cancelled

One of the few benefits of this awful situation

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Thu May 07, 2020 8:36 pm
by Disoriented
The benefit is to the BAME community, who have been horrendously over-represented in the death toll.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 8:05 am
by Long slender neck
Prove it?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 8:05 am
by Long slender neck
Who here does not want lockdown lifted?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 8:16 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
I don’t.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 8:38 am
by Mick McQuaid
Any lifting of restrictions has more to do with our dear leader's desperation to do something around VE day than it does with any scientific evidence. I'm moving heavy things out of arms reach to protect the TV when he says it's the end of the beginning.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 9:50 am
by slacker
My personal view is not much should change of restrictions be relaxed this month, but you can sense there's more traffic and people about the last week than before, so I guess the will to keep lockdown is ebbing away in some people.

It doesn't help when there's mixed messages leaked from the Govt, and there's always some global evidence the lockdown isn't essential (e.g. sweden), and sectors of the economy are tanking, so I get it's a difficult call.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 10:11 am
by BoniO
slacker wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 9:50 am My personal view is not much should change of restrictions be relaxed this month, but you can sense there's more traffic and people about the last week than before, so I guess the will to keep lockdown is ebbing away in some people.

It doesn't help when there's mixed messages leaked from the Govt, and there's always some global evidence the lockdown isn't essential (e.g. sweden), and sectors of the economy are tanking, so I get it's a difficult call.
I'd agree with the "not much should change" message but I think the mixed messages from the government is no accident. They can be seen to be sticking with the "stay home, protect the NHS" message whilst not really bothering to enforce the lockdown.

Sweden's numbers aren't good actually. They have a death rate of around 300 per million vs in the 40's per million for their neighbours, Norway and Finland. The lack of lockdown does appear to have been a dreadful mistake.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 10:23 am
by HeyO
Big mistake Sweden.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 10:25 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
There’s obviously a part of me that wants to be able to do SOMETHING aside from be at home and most of the people at work, as well as friends who are of similar age are fairly desperate for easing but realistic that it’s not really the time.

Not much has changed. It’s difficult. As I argued a month ago, it’s a big ask to enforce such a big change to every day lives. But you just HAVE to look at the long term. As tempting as it seems right now, like opening a Xmas present when you are 6 on Xmas eve, it’s a short term view and actually waiting a bit isn’t really gonna hurt and will give you a lot more benefits long term.

Imagine if it eases and we have to do this all again in June until September

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 10:39 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Mick McQuaid wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 8:38 am Any lifting of restrictions has more to do with our dear leader's desperation to do something around VE day than it does with any scientific evidence. I'm moving heavy things out of arms reach to protect the TV when he says it's the end of the beginning.
I’d guess it’s more to do with £s

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 11:15 am
by Long slender neck
Apple Wumble wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 10:25 am There’s obviously a part of me that wants to be able to do SOMETHING aside from be at home and most of the people at work, as well as friends who are of similar age are fairly desperate for easing but realistic that it’s not really the time.

Not much has changed. It’s difficult. As I argued a month ago, it’s a big ask to enforce such a big change to every day lives. But you just HAVE to look at the long term. As tempting as it seems right now, like opening a Xmas present when you are 6 on Xmas eve, it’s a short term view and actually waiting a bit isn’t really gonna hurt and will give you a lot more benefits long term.

Imagine if it eases and we have to do this all again in June until September
Hospital deaths are down to almost 200 a day, in about a fortnight there will be barely any deaths if this trajectory continues. The nightingale hospitals are empty. At what point would you ease things?

Every week on lockdown will probably mean an additional year of austerity.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 11:44 am
by moonwalk19
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 8:05 am Who here does not want lockdown lifted?
I certainly do not yet. While there are still hundreds of deaths every day I do not believe it’s the right time. From local stories told to me in my area there are still people around that are abusing the lockdown asked of them. I believe the majority of people are still scared to go back to the normal way of live . This is going to take many months to achieve.The government has got to get the release of lockdown right.At this moment in time I have little confidence in that they will.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:00 pm
by Long slender neck
If you are scared just stay in, then you won't be affected.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:15 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 11:15 am
Apple Wumble wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 10:25 am There’s obviously a part of me that wants to be able to do SOMETHING aside from be at home and most of the people at work, as well as friends who are of similar age are fairly desperate for easing but realistic that it’s not really the time.

Not much has changed. It’s difficult. As I argued a month ago, it’s a big ask to enforce such a big change to every day lives. But you just HAVE to look at the long term. As tempting as it seems right now, like opening a Xmas present when you are 6 on Xmas eve, it’s a short term view and actually waiting a bit isn’t really gonna hurt and will give you a lot more benefits long term.

Imagine if it eases and we have to do this all again in June until September
Hospital deaths are down to almost 200 a day, in about a fortnight there will be barely any deaths if this trajectory continues. The nightingale hospitals are empty. At what point would you ease things?

Every week on lockdown will probably mean an additional year of austerity.
Why ignore other deaths? Definitely headed in the right direction but BECAUSE of lockdown. As soon as you lift it those numbers go up again.

There’s certainly an argument for austerity and financial crashes causing more deaths but as it stands, f*** the economy. It’ll be alright if there’s another month lockdown.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:19 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 11:15 am
Apple Wumble wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 10:25 am There’s obviously a part of me that wants to be able to do SOMETHING aside from be at home and most of the people at work, as well as friends who are of similar age are fairly desperate for easing but realistic that it’s not really the time.

Not much has changed. It’s difficult. As I argued a month ago, it’s a big ask to enforce such a big change to every day lives. But you just HAVE to look at the long term. As tempting as it seems right now, like opening a Xmas present when you are 6 on Xmas eve, it’s a short term view and actually waiting a bit isn’t really gonna hurt and will give you a lot more benefits long term.

Imagine if it eases and we have to do this all again in June until September
Hospital deaths are down to almost 200 a day, in about a fortnight there will be barely any deaths if this trajectory continues. The nightingale hospitals are empty. At what point would you ease things?

Every week on lockdown will probably mean an additional year of austerity.
Austerity is here to stay forever regardless.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:24 pm
by BoniO
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 11:15 am
Apple Wumble wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 10:25 am There’s obviously a part of me that wants to be able to do SOMETHING aside from be at home and most of the people at work, as well as friends who are of similar age are fairly desperate for easing but realistic that it’s not really the time.

Not much has changed. It’s difficult. As I argued a month ago, it’s a big ask to enforce such a big change to every day lives. But you just HAVE to look at the long term. As tempting as it seems right now, like opening a Xmas present when you are 6 on Xmas eve, it’s a short term view and actually waiting a bit isn’t really gonna hurt and will give you a lot more benefits long term.

Imagine if it eases and we have to do this all again in June until September
Every week on lockdown will probably mean an additional year of austerity.
Serious question. How do you come to that precise conclusion?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:44 pm
by Long slender neck
Pure guesswork. Does it seem unrealistic?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:55 pm
by NuneatonO's
UK scientists furious over attempt to censor Covid-19 advice

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... -19-advice

This Tory Government really are a bunch of deceitful scum, aren't they.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:56 pm
by BoniO
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 12:44 pm Pure guesswork. Does it seem unrealistic?
Well yes it does. But that's based on pure guesswork too.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 1:00 pm
by Long slender neck
Apple Wumble wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 12:15 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 11:15 am
Apple Wumble wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 10:25 am There’s obviously a part of me that wants to be able to do SOMETHING aside from be at home and most of the people at work, as well as friends who are of similar age are fairly desperate for easing but realistic that it’s not really the time.

Not much has changed. It’s difficult. As I argued a month ago, it’s a big ask to enforce such a big change to every day lives. But you just HAVE to look at the long term. As tempting as it seems right now, like opening a Xmas present when you are 6 on Xmas eve, it’s a short term view and actually waiting a bit isn’t really gonna hurt and will give you a lot more benefits long term.

Imagine if it eases and we have to do this all again in June until September
Hospital deaths are down to almost 200 a day, in about a fortnight there will be barely any deaths if this trajectory continues. The nightingale hospitals are empty. At what point would you ease things?

Every week on lockdown will probably mean an additional year of austerity.
Why ignore other deaths? Definitely headed in the right direction but BECAUSE of lockdown. As soon as you lift it those numbers go up again.

There’s certainly an argument for austerity and financial crashes causing more deaths but as it stands, f*** the economy. It’ll be alright if there’s another month lockdown.
I haven't been following the other deaths, why aren't these people in hospitals?

The numbers infected will likely go up, they have to keep it manageable and those at serious risk should continue to isolate so that deaths can be kept down.

Austerity will mean misery for millions in all sorts of ways for years.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 1:02 pm
by HeyO
Austerity is inevitable.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 1:05 pm
by Long slender neck
Oh right, thought the last ten years were ideological?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 1:38 pm
by Millennial Snowflake

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 1:54 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 1:00 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 12:15 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 11:15 am
Hospital deaths are down to almost 200 a day, in about a fortnight there will be barely any deaths if this trajectory continues. The nightingale hospitals are empty. At what point would you ease things?

Every week on lockdown will probably mean an additional year of austerity.
Why ignore other deaths? Definitely headed in the right direction but BECAUSE of lockdown. As soon as you lift it those numbers go up again.

There’s certainly an argument for austerity and financial crashes causing more deaths but as it stands, f*** the economy. It’ll be alright if there’s another month lockdown.
I haven't been following the other deaths, why aren't these people in hospitals?

The numbers infected will likely go up, they have to keep it manageable and those at serious risk should continue to isolate so that deaths can be kept down.

Austerity will mean misery for millions in all sorts of ways for years.
Well austerity isn’t the only option. As we’ve seen, money is made up and turns out there is a ‘magic money tree’