Page 88 of 91

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 11:36 am
by Max B Gold

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 11:37 am
by CEB
Max doing his “vaguely say something without making a point, or saying what he actually thinks” again, I see.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:22 pm
by Max B Gold
Implicit in my comment is that thanks to the witch hunt, desperate people are being driven into the hands of exploitative drug dealers and away from medical supervision under the NHS. This is harmful to them.

But then you know that already but don't want to take responsibility for the damage your witch hunt causes.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:23 pm
by CEB
What a deeply stupid post. I hope your next one goes better for you.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:31 pm
by Max B Gold
Top reply. Cíos saor in aisce. Ag cónaí i do cheann folamh.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:35 pm
by CEB
The funniest thing about this thread is that Max is 100% on message in terms of the left’s approach to the issue of trans rights activism

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:38 pm
by Max B Gold
It took a while.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:38 pm
by Max B Gold
88 pages in fact

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:44 pm
by CEB
non sequiturs are fun!

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 1:34 pm
by Max B Gold
In all these years you haven't noticed I am the master of this non sequitur concept.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 1:37 pm
by CEB
:~

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 3:14 pm
by Long slender neck
Max B Gold wrote: Fri May 03, 2024 12:22 pm Implicit in my comment is that thanks to the witch hunt, desperate people are being driven into the hands of exploitative drug dealers and away from medical supervision under the NHS. This is harmful to them.

But then you know that already but don't want to take responsibility for the damage your witch hunt causes.
If people are determined to pursue unproven or dangerous treatments, what can be done? I dont think the answer is to provide them on the nhs.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 7:47 pm
by Max B Gold
Long slender neck wrote: Fri May 03, 2024 3:14 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Fri May 03, 2024 12:22 pm Implicit in my comment is that thanks to the witch hunt, desperate people are being driven into the hands of exploitative drug dealers and away from medical supervision under the NHS. This is harmful to them.

But then you know that already but don't want to take responsibility for the damage your witch hunt causes.
If people are determined to pursue unproven or dangerous treatments, what can be done? I dont think the answer is to provide them on the nhs.
Like you, I have literally no idea but there is a man on this thread who does. Hopefully he comes along soon to put us out of our thick misery

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 8:01 pm
by CEB
Genuinely baffling to see intelligent people acting as if some very straightforward points are incomprehensible. LSN is of course correct, as everybody would know if we were discussing literally anything else equivalent to this

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 9:59 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Want to legally change you gender? You GP will be able to sign it off under Labour

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/604c ... a7317e2ac8

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 10:32 pm
by The Mindsweep
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 9:59 pm Want to legally change you gender? You GP will be able to sign it off under Labour

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/604c ... a7317e2ac8
I see the Tory client journalists have been fed their daily non factual Labour scaremongering story.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 10:42 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
The Mindsweep wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 10:32 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 9:59 pm Want to legally change you gender? You GP will be able to sign it off under Labour

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/604c ... a7317e2ac8
I see the Tory client journalists have been fed their daily non factual Labour scaremongering story.
Please link me to where they’ve denied the story that contains quotes from the shadow minister who would be responsible?

I’ll wait

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 10:59 pm
by The Mindsweep
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 10:42 pm
The Mindsweep wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 10:32 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 9:59 pm Want to legally change you gender? You GP will be able to sign it off under Labour

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/604c ... a7317e2ac8
I see the Tory client journalists have been fed their daily non factual Labour scaremongering story.
Please link me to where they’ve denied the story that contains quotes from the shadow minister who would be responsible?

I’ll wait
There is no story.

Labour has just indicated they would update the process, nothing about a GP being able to sign it off.

If it helps I've cut and pasted the quote from the shadow minister that is in the article

Anneliese Dodds, the shadow women and equalities secretary, said she wanted to strip out the “futile and dehumanising parts” of acquiring a gender recognition certificate.

“We believe everyone should be treated with dignity and respect,” she said. “We want to see the process for gender recognition modernised, while protecting single sex spaces for biological women. This means stripping out the futile and dehumanising parts of the process for obtaining a gender ­recognition certificate, while retaining important safeguards.

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 11:19 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
So you think the source the story is based on is made up? Bold claim

If so, I look forward to the party refuting the story.

They won’t because it’s legitimate

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Mon May 20, 2024 11:18 am
by CEB
The Mindsweep wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 10:59 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 10:42 pm
The Mindsweep wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 10:32 pm

I see the Tory client journalists have been fed their daily non factual Labour scaremongering story.
Please link me to where they’ve denied the story that contains quotes from the shadow minister who would be responsible?

I’ll wait
There is no story.

Labour has just indicated they would update the process, nothing about a GP being able to sign it off.

If it helps I've cut and pasted the quote from the shadow minister that is in the article

Anneliese Dodds, the shadow women and equalities secretary, said she wanted to strip out the “futile and dehumanising parts” of acquiring a gender recognition certificate.

“We believe everyone should be treated with dignity and respect,” she said. “We want to see the process for gender recognition modernised, while protecting single sex spaces for biological women. This means stripping out the futile and dehumanising parts of the process for obtaining a gender ­recognition certificate, while retaining important safeguards.
So you’re currently at the “it isn’t happening” phase.

Can you confirm what your position would be if it is happening? Cos a lot of people advocating for the trans rights side of things seem to work on the two step “this isn’t happening… ok it might be happening but it’s GOOD that it’s happening”

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Mon May 20, 2024 11:25 am
by Long slender neck
What is the current process?

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Mon May 20, 2024 11:34 am
by The Mindsweep
CEB wrote: Mon May 20, 2024 11:18 am
The Mindsweep wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 10:59 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 10:42 pm

Please link me to where they’ve denied the story that contains quotes from the shadow minister who would be responsible?

I’ll wait
There is no story.

Labour has just indicated they would update the process, nothing about a GP being able to sign it off.

If it helps I've cut and pasted the quote from the shadow minister that is in the article

Anneliese Dodds, the shadow women and equalities secretary, said she wanted to strip out the “futile and dehumanising parts” of acquiring a gender recognition certificate.

“We believe everyone should be treated with dignity and respect,” she said. “We want to see the process for gender recognition modernised, while protecting single sex spaces for biological women. This means stripping out the futile and dehumanising parts of the process for obtaining a gender ­recognition certificate, while retaining important safeguards.
So you’re currently at the “it isn’t happening” phase.

Can you confirm what your position would be if it is happening? Cos a lot of people advocating for the trans rights side of things seem to work on the two step “this isn’t happening… ok it might be happening but it’s GOOD that it’s happening”
The stage I am at personally is irrelevant with regards to the article. I was questioning its accuracy as it falls into one of the ever decreasing attack lines that the Tories are throwing at Labour.

It may have been better placed in the general Labour thread

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Mon May 20, 2024 12:47 pm
by CEB
It’s not irrelevant, because as Dunners says, it’s accurate. So I’m asking what your position will be once it comes out as accurate: you can choose to see it as hypothetical if you like.
I don’t see why you would feel that you can’t answer

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Mon May 20, 2024 12:47 pm
by CEB
Long slender neck wrote: Mon May 20, 2024 11:25 am What is the current process?
Panel of medical professionals reviewing evidence after meeting specific criteria

Re: The trans debate

Posted: Mon May 20, 2024 12:48 pm
by CEB
You’ll never guess what the throwaway sentence about “spouse objections” means in practice, by the way