RedO wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 11:07 pm
You are absolutely a know it all, despite being as thick as mince.
I’ve literally no idea why anyone would try and defend the alleged rapist Tory mp. Sick.
Except I have not defended him at all. If your IQ was greater than 10 even you could see that. Though I do find your last sentence hugely amusing and very telling.
I’ll type this slowly because I know you don’t read too well. I’m not attacking or defending him, allegations are made and need investigating. If proven guilty I hope he rots in jail for a good many years.
RedO wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 11:07 pm
You are absolutely a know it all, despite being as thick as mince.
I’ve literally no idea why anyone would try and defend the alleged rapist Tory mp. Sick.
Except I have not defended him at all. If your IQ was greater than 10 even you could see that. Though I do find your last sentence hugely amusing and very telling.
I’ll type this slowly because I know you don’t read too well. I’m not attacking or defending him, allegations are made and need investigating. If proven guilty I hope he rots in jail for a good many years.
Clear! Get it? Got it? Good.
Bye.
You have defended him, using a method commonly referred to as ‘whataboutery’.
Shameful.
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 7:23 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
That Tory bloke should be suspended.
But what about that hitler character? Vile person who got away with all those deaths.
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 7:35 am
by NuneatonO's
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 7:23 am
That Tory bloke should be suspended.
But what about that hitler character? Vile person who got away with all those deaths.
Oh, you mean Iain Duncan Smith?
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 8:14 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 7:23 am
That Tory bloke should be suspended.
But what about that hitler character? Vile person who got away with all those deaths.
Mafy only has it in for the left politicians, despite being a centrist. I don’t think he would have criticised Hitler in such a way.
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:15 am
by Ornchurch
Admin wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:46 pm
I suspect you’ve brought this case up as a comparable as it involves a labour councillor. You’re about the 4th person I’ve seen do this today on social media. Each one looking to level the score as such between labour / Tory. How f*cking sad are you?
I thought that was the whole point of the two threads Labour Watch and Tory Watch; for the point scoring
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:39 am
by JimbO
I do wander if some people (Red O being an example) would be as abusive to people to their face as they are on here.
Also seems to be plenty of people who only see the political spectrum through one pair of tinted glasses.
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:01 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
JimbO wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:39 am
I do wander if some people (Red O being an example) would be as abusive to people to their face as they are on here.
Also seems to be plenty of people who only see the political spectrum through one pair of tinted glasses.
Who have I been abusive to jimbo?
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:21 am
by NuneatonO's
JimbO wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:39 am
Also seems to be plenty of people who only see the political spectrum through one pair of tinted glasses.
If you'd care to enlighten me about anything achieved by this Government that is worthy of any appreciation, I'll be only too pleased to oblige.
The fact is that this modern-day Tory Party Govt. particularly under Johnson's tenure, is the most corrupt, lying, incompetent, dangerous circus of clowns than I have ever known during my lifetime.
They are below contempt.
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 12:54 pm
by Thor
NuneatonO its OK, you can come out and admit you've voted tory all your life and that you love them.
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:21 pm
by tuffers#1
Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 am
Those stats are from 2015/16 and are the amount overclaimed minus the amount recovered, which isn't the same as fraud. Overpayment of housing benefit accounted for about half of all the money lost, the payments going to the landlord rather than the person claiming benefits.
Of the remaining benefits the overpayment rate was estimated at just over 1%, for disability benefits (where there was the highest number of 'tip offs' by members of the public that someone might be committing fraud) it was estimated at less than 0.5%. Despite public opinion, especially amongst thickos like Thor who has repeatedly demonstrated what a thicko he is, it is in no way a 'massive issue.
Now for Dohnut to do his thing of saying lies, lies and statistics l, despite him being the person trying to use them as a basis for his argument.
Be careful fella
I got an official warning for using the Th*ck# word against Thory .
JimbO wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:39 am
Also seems to be plenty of people who only see the political spectrum through one pair of tinted glasses.
If you'd care to enlighten me about anything achieved by this Government that is worthy of any appreciation, I'll be only too pleased to oblige.
The fact is that this modern-day Tory Party Govt. particularly under Johnson's tenure, is the most corrupt, lying, incompetent, dangerous circus of clowns than I have ever known during my lifetime.
They are below contempt.
I didn't say they had.
Just that some wouldn't admit it any way. I didn't vote for either of the inept clowns that were running the two main parties at the time of the last election.
Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 am
Those stats are from 2015/16 and are the amount overclaimed minus the amount recovered, which isn't the same as fraud. Overpayment of housing benefit accounted for about half of all the money lost, the payments going to the landlord rather than the person claiming benefits.
Of the remaining benefits the overpayment rate was estimated at just over 1%, for disability benefits (where there was the highest number of 'tip offs' by members of the public that someone might be committing fraud) it was estimated at less than 0.5%. Despite public opinion, especially amongst thickos like Thor who has repeatedly demonstrated what a thicko he is, it is in no way a 'massive issue.
Now for Dohnut to do his thing of saying lies, lies and statistics l, despite him being the person trying to use them as a basis for his argument.
Be careful fella
I got an official warning for using the Th*ck# word against Thory .
Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 am
Those stats are from 2015/16 and are the amount overclaimed minus the amount recovered, which isn't the same as fraud. Overpayment of housing benefit accounted for about half of all the money lost, the payments going to the landlord rather than the person claiming benefits.
Of the remaining benefits the overpayment rate was estimated at just over 1%, for disability benefits (where there was the highest number of 'tip offs' by members of the public that someone might be committing fraud) it was estimated at less than 0.5%. Despite public opinion, especially amongst thickos like Thor who has repeatedly demonstrated what a thicko he is, it is in no way a 'massive issue.
Now for Dohnut to do his thing of saying lies, lies and statistics l, despite him being the person trying to use them as a basis for his argument.
Be careful fella
I got an official warning for using the Th*ck# word against Thory .
But he is. How is that worthy of a warning?
You tell me RedO
" Board warning issuedDeleteReportQuote
Sent: Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:42 am
From: Prestige Worldwide
Recipient: tuffers#1
The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=3&p=126883#p126883 .
Strike 2 ".
Some have favouties it seems
Or maybe a 1 sided political bias .
Who knows .
I get the feeling he is Bojos Eton Fag &
They let him go there just for laughs
Absolutely disgusting post, which I trust will get you the ban it deserves. You are contemptuous.
Thicko Thory
It refers to this post Redo
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:01 pm
by Ornchurch
So you repost the post that got you a warning in the first place? Quality
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:06 pm
by tuffers#1
Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 am
Despite public opinion, especially amongst thickos like Thor who has repeatedly demonstrated what a thicko he is, it is in no way a 'massive issue.
No Orn' just pointing out that the same word has been used twice to describe a boarder.
1 user gets a warning for that word specifically .
The other doesnt .
If its about the use of the word , then Mick gets a Warning as well or
My warning gets removed .
Admin , your moderator colleague has not been consistent .
Please amend it .
Or bring balance to the board with another modertor .
P.S my apologies to you Mick .
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:07 pm
by tuffers#1
Ornchurch wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:01 pm
So you repost the post that got you a warning in the first place? Quality
Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 am
Despite public opinion, especially amongst thickos like Thor who has repeatedly demonstrated what a thicko he is, it is in no way a 'massive issue.
No Orn' just pointing out that the same word has been used twice to describe a boarder.
1 user gets a warning for that word specifically .
The other doesnt .
If its about the use of the word , then Mick gets a Warning as well or
My warning gets removed .
Admin , your moderator colleague has not been consistent .
Please amend it .
Or bring balance to the board with another modertor .
Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 am
Despite public opinion, especially amongst thickos like Thor who has repeatedly demonstrated what a thicko he is, it is in no way a 'massive issue.
No Orn' just pointing out that the same word has been used twice to describe a boarder.
1 user gets a warning for that word specifically .
The other doesnt .
If its about the use of the word , then Mick gets a Warning as well or
My warning gets removed .
Admin , your moderator colleague has not been consistent .
Please amend it .
Or bring balance to the board with another modertor .
P.S my apologies to you Mick .
Miss, Miss. Please Miss. It's not fair Miss.
Its about being consistant Orn'
If i get a warning then Mick gets one as well .
Admin & co need to clarify on the board that Mick has been warned for
What was Said & to show proof he was warned .
If he is then i will accept the warning .
If it isnt then mine needs to be withdrawn .
The message board either has rules or it doesnt .
If it doesnt then you can use lots of words to describe people you dislike
disagree with without fear of a ban .
If there are rules the rules must be applied consistently.
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:56 pm
by Ornchurch
What if Mick doesn't get a warning? Are you going to take it up with your local MP?
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:09 pm
by tuffers#1
Ornchurch wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:56 pm
What if Mick doesn't get a warning? Are you going to take it up with your local MP?
Nope but i may( may meaning its 1 of a lot of possibilities)
take it up with Leyton Orient Football club & have them take a stance
aginst the Administrator of the board to allow something that uses the
Leyton Orient part in its name .
If it gets put into the public domain , social media etc
about certain boarders having certain views
It could show the Club in a very bad light .
Something none of us would wish for .
Especially when the club has done so much to promote its good name & those
Of Orient fans in general.
Im sure Admin doesnt need that type of hassle so it would be best to be consistent.&
Give Mick the warning .
In fact ill make a complaint about the post myself so thor or anyone else doesnt have to.
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:11 pm
by tuffers#1
Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 am
Those stats are from 2015/16 and are the amount overclaimed minus the amount recovered, which isn't the same as fraud. Overpayment of housing benefit accounted for about half of all the money lost, the payments going to the landlord rather than the person claiming benefits.
Of the remaining benefits the overpayment rate was estimated at just over 1%, for disability benefits (where there was the highest number of 'tip offs' by members of the public that someone might be committing fraud) it was estimated at less than 0.5%. Despite public opinion, especially amongst thickos like Thor who has repeatedly demonstrated what a thicko he is, it is in no way a 'massive issue.
Now for Dohnut to do his thing of saying lies, lies and statistics l, despite him being the person trying to use them as a basis for his argument.
Reported
Sorry Mick , had to be done .
Re: Tory Watch
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:22 pm
by Long slender neck
Mick McQuaid wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:27 am
Those stats are from 2015/16 and are the amount overclaimed minus the amount recovered, which isn't the same as fraud. Overpayment of housing benefit accounted for about half of all the money lost, the payments going to the landlord rather than the person claiming benefits.
Of the remaining benefits the overpayment rate was estimated at just over 1%, for disability benefits (where there was the highest number of 'tip offs' by members of the public that someone might be committing fraud) it was estimated at less than 0.5%. Despite public opinion, especially amongst thickos like Thor who has repeatedly demonstrated what a thicko he is, it is in no way a 'massive issue.
Now for Dohnut to do his thing of saying lies, lies and statistics l, despite him being the person trying to use them as a basis for his argument.
Hi Mick,
You have just been grassed up by Tuffers for calling Thor a thicko and I have to agree it has spoiled a good post. Please consider this a warning.