Page 8 of 10
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 11:45 am
by BoniO
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 11:37 am
I don't want him 'cancelled', whatever that means, I just don't want him as 2nd in charge at my football club.
Thanks for that Ronnie. How many other aliases are you using to keep this one going?
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:16 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 11:37 am
I don't want him 'cancelled', whatever that means, I just don't want him as 2nd in charge at my football club.
So you don't want him cancelled, just to lose his job based on actions years ago.
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:22 pm
by PutneyO
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 11:37 am
I don't want him 'cancelled', whatever that means, I just don't want him as 2nd in charge at my football club.
With all due respect, if you're a plumber you're the last person in the world to be holier than thou.
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:31 pm
by Max Fowler
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:16 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 11:37 am
I don't want him 'cancelled', whatever that means, I just don't want him as 2nd in charge at my football club.
So you don't want him cancelled, just to lose his job based on actions years ago.
He can keep his old job, no problem.
I just didn't want Ling to give him a new job at my football club.
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:35 pm
by Max B Gold
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:16 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 11:37 am
I don't want him 'cancelled', whatever that means, I just don't want him as 2nd in charge at my football club.
So you don't want him cancelled, just to lose his job based on actions years ago.
I'm less concerned about the shagging and gambling, that can be forgiven.
I'm more concerned that he was damaging the club when tapping up our players. You don't get to come back after that. Is the tapping up bit actually true?
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:36 pm
by Max Fowler
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:35 pm
I'm less concerned about the shagging and gambling, that can be forgiven.
I'm more concerned that he was damaging the club when tapping up our players.
Gilso? That you?
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:40 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:31 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:16 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 11:37 am
I don't want him 'cancelled', whatever that means, I just don't want him as 2nd in charge at my football club.
So you don't want him cancelled, just to lose his job based on actions years ago.
He can keep his old job, no problem.
I just didn't want Ling to give him a new job at my football club.
Right, so now you want him sacked based on actions years ago.
But not cancelled, got it.
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:43 pm
by tuffers#1
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:36 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:35 pm
I'm less concerned about the shagging and gambling, that can be forgiven.
I'm more concerned that he was damaging the club when tapping up our players.
Gilso? That you?
No max is dunners
Gilso is an under 1000 posts !
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:44 pm
by Omygawd
PutneyO wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 11:43 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 8:16 pm
List so far, add your names to the below.
Confirmed:
Bluecap
Y o y o y o
Ronnie Hotdogs
Omygawd
Cockhat
PondhillO
You'll all be missed
I am shallow enough to be reconsidering my position based on your in-depth assessment and my mate offering to buy all the pre match beer next home game.
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:50 pm
by Max Fowler
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:40 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:31 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:16 pm
So you don't want him cancelled, just to lose his job based on actions years ago.
He can keep his old job, no problem.
I just didn't want Ling to give him a new job at my football club.
Right, so now you want him sacked based on actions years ago.
But not cancelled, got it.
How is this so difficult?
I just don't want him to be given a job at our club.
He can carry on doing whatever he was doing before, that's fine.
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:56 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:50 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:40 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:31 pm
He can keep his old job, no problem.
I just didn't want Ling to give him a new job at my football club.
Right, so now you want him sacked based on actions years ago.
But not cancelled, got it.
How is this so difficult?
I just don't want him to be given a job at our club.
He can carry on doing whatever he was doing before, that's fine.
But he has been, so would you like him sacked now or not?
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:09 pm
by CEB
It’s one of those things that’s a bit depressing that it’s happened, but not much we can do about it except say that it’s . It’s not about Terry, it’s about the club seemingly not recognising that a move like this is gonna piss people off.
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:13 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Given the desperate situation the board were in and length of time it got RW to sign it wouldn't be surprising that letting him pick his no. 2 was part of the deal.
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:44 pm
by Max Fowler
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:13 pm
Given the desperate situation the board were in and length of time it got RW to sign it wouldn't be surprising that letting him pick his no. 2 was part of the deal.
I dunno.
Have they got that much history together? Would RW have been so insistent on PT being his number 2 that he'd have turned down the job without him?
I reckon it was more a case of RW suggesting it and Lingy simply going along with it. It's another ex Ling player so suited him. He and the board just didn't see the backlash from the fans.
Re: Paul Terry.
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:58 pm
by ValJac
Story of O wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 7:55 am
Sadly affairs happen all the time. I wonder how many of our former players have been naughty boys and strayed. And are we going to stop listening to our favourite music, watching our favourite films and reading our favourite authors if we find out they have had affairs?
IIRC Gary Alexander left Hull to come to us in dubious circumstances involving a clubs members wife?
John Mackie was accused of racism at Reading.
Re: The Terry boycott
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:02 pm
by Max B Gold
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:36 pm
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:35 pm
I'm less concerned about the shagging and gambling, that can be forgiven.
I'm more concerned that he was damaging the club when tapping up our players.
Gilso? That you?
Hey Garydog. You're not the only one who can do a WUM.
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:02 pm
by BoniO
Plus Justin Edinburgh didn't come out well from the boys suicide. I'm sure he looked back on that and regretted some of his actions.
Where do you draw the line?
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:14 pm
by Max Fowler
BoniO wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:02 pm
Where do you draw the line?
With the Terrys.
All this Whataboutterry is a bit much, don't you think?
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:16 pm
by Give it to Jabo
Of course, we all can not easily prevent ourselves from judging others. There was something hard to like about the way that P T played his football when he made appearances with us. Cynical to the point of being nasty at times; well that was the impression I gained. He does not seem to have been much punished for his "crimes", either. He has bad odour.
Then again, it is so easy to be holier than thou. If he can somehow show some contrition and humility of the kind that Ricky Otto was perfect at, well and good. Just wish he could start the process at some other club.
Re: Paul Terry.
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:16 pm
by Max Fowler
ValJac wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:58 pm
Story of O wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 7:55 am
Sadly affairs happen all the time. I wonder how many of our former players have been naughty boys and strayed. And are we going to stop listening to our favourite music, watching our favourite films and reading our favourite authors if we find out they have had affairs?
IIRC Gary Alexander left Hull to come to us in dubious circumstances involving a clubs members wife?
John Mackie was accused of racism at Reading.
I have no recollection of Gary Alexanders arrival.
It's well documented that Mackie racially abused a fellow professional footballer, he has talked openly and honestly about it.
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 3:34 pm
by BoniO
Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:14 pm
BoniO wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:02 pm
Where do you draw the line?
With the Terrys.
All this Whataboutterry is a bit much, don't you think?
Hehe - but GaryDog - that's all you've been doing for the last day or so. I can't stand John Terry, couldn't recall the Paul Terry incident but you're on a one man mission to sh-it stir this for all it's worth. I know accountancy is boring but you're overcompensating mate.
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 4:49 pm
by PutneyO
Bluecap, Y o y o y o, Ronnie Hotdogs, Omygawd, Cockhat, PondhillO,
Why do you feel you're so superior to Paul Terry, you've probably all had your collar felt at one time or another, a couple of you may even have been inside. Your hypocrisy disgusts me
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:05 pm
by Omygawd
PutneyO wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 4:49 pm
Bluecap, Y o y o y o, Ronnie Hotdogs, Omygawd, Cockhat, PondhillO,
Why do you feel you're so superior to Paul Terry, you've probably all had your collar felt at one time or another, a couple of you may even have been inside. Your hypocrisy disgusts me
Post reported.
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:09 pm
by Omygawd
PutneyO wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 4:49 pm
Bluecap, Y o y o y o, Ronnie Hotdogs, Omygawd, Cockhat, PondhillO,
Why do you feel you're so superior to Paul Terry, you've probably all had your collar felt at one time or another, a couple of you may even have been inside. Your hypocrisy disgusts me
Wind your neck in Sonny. Putting such unfounded suggestions in writing does you no credit.
Re: Who made the decision to appoint Paul Terry?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 5:15 pm
by Admin
PutneyO wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 4:49 pm
Bluecap, Y o y o y o, Ronnie Hotdogs, Omygawd, Cockhat, PondhillO,
Why do you feel you're so superior to Paul Terry, you've probably all had your collar felt at one time or another, a couple of you may even have been inside. Your hypocrisy disgusts me
This has been reported to me. Please do not make allegations of this nature unless you can prove all of the above have had their collars felt. Allegations against Hotdogs are fine though.
Appreciate this is an emotive subject but quite a lot of you on both sides of this debate need to calm the f*** down and get a grip of yourselves. Otherwise I have to start moddin' and I can't really be arsed to referee boarders behaving like wankpuffins.