Independent Leyton Orient Forum

Racists can be racially abused it like saying you can not murder a murderer

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:18 pm

Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:39 am

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 19, 2021 11:56 am

HE APOLOGISED & SAID THERE WERE NO EXCUSES FOR
HIS DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR ON SOCIAL MEDIA.

YORKSHIRE PLAYERS RACIALLY ABUSED HIM THEN
P155ED ON HIM & NONE OF THEM HAVE STATED
THEY WERE BEING BOIGOTED OR RACIST .

THEY SAID IT WAS BANTZ .

D9es that make you understand it a bit better now

This reminds me..Didn't Monty Panasar piss on a steward from a balcony a few years back..

How is that relevant to this thread?

Very interested to hear your explanation for this…

So 'very interested' are you in hearing my explanation , really? Well, you're quite right, it's not relevent to this thread. But like I said it 'reminded' me - two cricketers, and both involved in pis___g incidents. Thought that was a pretty easy, putting two and two together. But I think you knew that anyway.

KVN wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:52 pm Racists can be racially abused it like saying you can not murder a murderer

Most Racists are usually
Just called Th*ck C#nts arent they ?

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 6:27 pm

KVN wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:52 pm Racists can be racially abused it like saying you can not murder a murderer

Most Racists are usually
Just called Th*ck C#nts arent they ?

Most racists are usually just called Th*ck C#nts, but not all Th*ck C#nts are racists.

Admin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 4:58 pm

Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 4:42 pm

Admin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 3:54 pm

I think you may have - purely on the aspect of being unfunny as if applied across the board, almost everyone (including me) would be serving bans.

I'd like him to explain what he meant. No skin off my nose to perma him - I'd just like to give him the option to explain himself.

Could you also ask him to explain his casual use of the word "retard"?

I'd missed that. Good job you're here to bring this to my attention.

I've been called worse - I'm married.

KVN wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 6:52 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 6:27 pm

KVN wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:52 pm Racists can be racially abused it like saying you can not murder a murderer

Most Racists are usually
Just called Th*ck C#nts arent they ?

Most racists are usually just called Th*ck C#nts, but not all Th*ck C#nts are racists.

Indeed .

It would be great to see the percentage of
Clever Racist C*nts to Thick Racist C*nts ,
Just for scientific research obviously .

BoniO wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 10:12 am

PutneyO wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:37 am I think Azeem Rafiq is a wonderful human being and that he should stand for Parliament in the Leeds North West constituency

That’s a shame, he thinks you’re a tw*t

Bonio, have you ever considered presenting BBC's Newsnight ? A person of your intellect would be just right for this job !!

Why thank you. It'd probably improve the programme substantially. I'm in.

The problem of investigating historical racism is that even if improvements have been made someone still has to hang for it or it looks toothless.

Mark0 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:21 pm The problem of investigating historical racism is that even if improvements have been made someone still has to hang for it or it looks toothless.

Out of interest, what qualifies as "historical"? 10 years, last year, last week, yesterday?

Mark0 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:21 pm The problem of investigating historical racism is that even if improvements have been made someone still has to hang for it or it looks toothless.

Is the answer to not investigate racism that is over one year old and sweep anything older under the carpet?

Mark0 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:21 pm The problem of investigating historical racism is that even if improvements have been made someone still has to hang for it or it looks toothless.

BoniO wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:36 pm

Mark0 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:21 pm The problem of investigating historical racism is that even if improvements have been made someone still has to hang for it or it looks toothless.

Out of interest, what qualifies as "historical"? 10 years, last year, last week, yesterday?

Exactly but maybe last week is not long enough.
Maybe a month but 5 to 10 years would qualify imo, but u can think different.
Especially if they are in a legal grey are at the time.