Independent Leyton Orient Forum

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 12:59 pm Not clicking that, looks dodgy.

Dunners wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 10:16 am

ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 10:13 am Nato is almost 100% responsible for this terrible war, with all its suffering, although Putin hasnt covered himself in glory either

The woman was almost 100% responsible for her rape, with her short skirt and that, although the rapist didn't cover himself in glory either.

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:21 am Re article I referred to above.

This is the right one.

https://consortiumnews.com/2023/06/01/p ... ed-to-see/

Real Al wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 3:48 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:21 am Re article I referred to above.

This is the right one.

https://consortiumnews.com/2023/06/01/p ... ed-to-see/

Love this bit at the bottom: "The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News."

Not really surprised, as the author spends the whole article mocking other journalists for not going to a warzone, while merely putting their own view on someone else's reporting, while themselves not entering a warzone.

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:13 pm

Real Al wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 3:48 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:21 am Re article I referred to above.

This is the right one.

https://consortiumnews.com/2023/06/01/p ... ed-to-see/

Love this bit at the bottom: "The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News."

Not really surprised, as the author spends the whole article mocking other journalists for not going to a warzone, while merely putting their own view on someone else's reporting, while themselves not entering a warzone.

Do you believe he would be allowed to report from the war zone? But, thanks for missing the point entirely and deflecting from the sorry role the Western corporate media propaganda machine has played which has led to an information scarcity about the war and its context. Hoist the blue and yellow flag and boo the bogey man.

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:49 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:13 pm

Real Al wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 3:48 pm

Love this bit at the bottom: "The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News."

Not really surprised, as the author spends the whole article mocking other journalists for not going to a warzone, while merely putting their own view on someone else's reporting, while themselves not entering a warzone.

Do you believe he would be allowed to report from the war zone? But, thanks for missing the point entirely and deflecting from the sorry role the Western corporate media propaganda machine has played which has led to an information scarcity about the war and its context. Hoist the blue and yellow flag and boo the bogey man.

Max reporting on an Ancient gun that has been talked about for over 11 months .

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:57 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:49 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:13 pm

Do you believe he would be allowed to report from the war zone? But, thanks for missing the point entirely and deflecting from the sorry role the Western corporate media propaganda machine has played which has led to an information scarcity about the war and its context. Hoist the blue and yellow flag and boo the bogey man.

Max reporting on an Ancient gun that has been talked about for over 11 months .

That isn't the point being made. But thanks anyway for your snider.

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 5:01 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:57 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:49 pm

Max reporting on an Ancient gun that has been talked about for over 11 months .

That isn't the point being made. But thanks anyway for your snider.

It was the 1st point made in the article , I Shall debunk the other points within the next 24-48 hours.

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:05 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 5:01 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:57 pm

That isn't the point being made. But thanks anyway for your snider.

It was the 1st point made in the article , I Shall debunk the other points within the next 24-48 hours.

It's not me making the point but the New Yorker magazine which is quoted in the Consortium news article.

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:15 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:05 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 5:01 pm

It was the 1st point made in the article , I Shall debunk the other points within the next 24-48 hours.

It's not me making the point but the New Yorker magazine which is quoted in the Consortium news article.

Which has been lazily written by someone rehashing old news ie a ww1 machine gun that has kowingly been used for 11 months. Its hardly hard edged ground breaking Journalism is it ?

ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:35 pm

Dunners wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 10:16 am

ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 10:13 am Nato is almost 100% responsible for this terrible war, with all its suffering, although Putin hasnt covered himself in glory either

The woman was almost 100% responsible for her rape, with her short skirt and that, although the rapist didn't cover himself in glory either.

What completely and utterly ridiculous analogy. I cant believe you are serious actually.

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:49 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:15 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:05 pm

It's not me making the point but the New Yorker magazine which is quoted in the Consortium news article.

Which has been lazily written by someone rehashing old news ie a ww1 machine gun that has kowingly been used for 11 months. Its hardly hard edged ground breaking Journalism is it ?

No they mention it in an article published on 29 May as part of the wider point about the shoddy materials and arms being provided to them and is from their observations of the frontline a few months ago. I'm beginning to wonder if you have read and understand the article and the bigger picture point the Consortium guy is making.

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 7:53 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:49 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:15 pm

Which has been lazily written by someone rehashing old news ie a ww1 machine gun that has kowingly been used for 11 months. Its hardly hard edged ground breaking Journalism is it ?

No they mention it in an article published on 29 May as part of the wider point about the shoddy materials and arms being provided to them and is from their observations of the frontline a few months ago. I'm beginning to wonder if you have read and understand the article and the bigger picture point the Consortium guy is making.

O.K , Lets play along the guy writes a story about some differing reporting styles that says very little about the war, soldiers being scared about things exploding near them, old guns holding lines & no visible winner 14 months into a 3 week Invasion . Other than that he has said F#ck all .

Those old guns poorly trained soldiers seem to be filling an awful lot of graves &
Urns

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 8:56 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 7:53 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:49 pm

No they mention it in an article published on 29 May as part of the wider point about the shoddy materials and arms being provided to them and is from their observations of the frontline a few months ago. I'm beginning to wonder if you have read and understand the article and the bigger picture point the Consortium guy is making.

O.K , Lets play along the guy writes a story about some differing reporting styles that says very little about the war, soldiers being scared about things exploding near them, old guns holding lines & no visible winner 14 months into a 3 week Invasion . Other than that he has said F#ck all .

Those old guns poorly trained soldiers seem to be filling an awful lot of graves &
Urns

He is saying something fundamental about the reporting of this war and the complicity of the media of not reporting (or even being in a position to report) what is actually happening.

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 9:14 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 8:56 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 7:53 pm

O.K , Lets play along the guy writes a story about some differing reporting styles that says very little about the war, soldiers being scared about things exploding near them, old guns holding lines & no visible winner 14 months into a 3 week Invasion . Other than that he has said F#ck all .

Those old guns poorly trained soldiers seem to be filling an awful lot of graves &
Urns

He is saying something fundamental about the reporting of this war and the complicity of the media of not reporting (or even being in a position to report) what is actually happening.

In other words he is being paid to write an article he has no Idea about whats going on , an old gun soldiers fearful of dying & not knowing who will win .Again Hard nosed Cutting Edge reporting its not ! Cheers Thank you !

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 9:32 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 9:14 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 8:56 pm

He is saying something fundamental about the reporting of this war and the complicity of the media of not reporting (or even being in a position to report) what is actually happening.

In other words he is being paid to write an article he has no Idea about whats going on , an old gun soldiers fearful of dying & not knowing who will win .Again Hard nosed Cutting Edge reporting its not ! Cheers Thank you !

You can take a horse to water .....etc,etc. I give up.

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 1:43 pm Putin moving nukes to Belarus.

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 2:02 pm

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 1:43 pm Putin moving nukes to Belarus.

How do you feel about that?

FrankOFile wrote: ↑Sat Jun 10, 2023 9:18 am

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 2:02 pm

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 1:43 pm Putin moving nukes to Belarus.

How do you feel about that?

I suppose that is our fault too.

Long slender neck wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 1:43 pm Putin moving nukes to Belarus.