Oh Max the bbc link shows the video Boris saying it directly & you said
quote="Max B Gold" post_id=304192 time=1675114064 user_id=87]
FFS!! He hasn't launched it yet. Boris said he threatened him with it, and I believe him.
So why wont you believe when he says it was before
The "Special Operation" ?
So ill post yhe beeb link again of what B*dge said
Yes. That should prove it. Cheers.
Of course Russia could erase the UK from the map but that would also mean Russia being erased from the map . I think these Russian propagandists just like blowing hot air .
[/quote]
Was that a nuclear war ? Only one team entered the tournament so more of a walk over than a war .
You just can't stop yourself. There was a war on. Nuclear weapons were used, thus making it a nuclear war. I make me right.
Yes there was a war but only 1 side had nukes! You butted in as always & WRONGLY here as Red specifically stated " NUCLEAR WAR " & not a "REGULAR WAR" till one side found it had nukes !!!
If you dont like it snot face go find a Bandstand !
Was that a nuclear war ? Only one team entered the tournament so more of a walk over than a war .
You just can't stop yourself. There was a war on. Nuclear weapons were used, thus making it a nuclear war. I make me right.
Yes there was a war but only 1 side had nukes! You butted in as always & WRONGLY here as Red specifically stated " NUCLEAR WAR " & not a "REGULAR WAR" till one side found it had nukes !!!
If you dont like it snot face go find a Bandstand !
I'm sure someone will fight you there !
And then the REGULAR WAR became a NUCLEAR WAR. You know the bit when NUCLEAR BOMBS were used. That bit made it a NUCLEAR WAR. Nothing can change those FACTS.
Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:01 pm
by StillSpike
If Russia nuke the West to bits before the West gets a shot off, then that'd still be a nuclear war, wouldn't it, even tho only one side used them?
Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:06 pm
by Max B Gold
StillSpike wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:01 pm
If Russia nuke the West to bits before the West gets a shot off, then that'd still be a nuclear war, wouldn't it, even tho only one side used them?
I believe there is a certain logic in that. Don't expect Tufft""""""yyyyy will agree though. So looks like you are heading for a showdown at the Bandstand.
You just can't stop yourself. There was a war on. Nuclear weapons were used, thus making it a nuclear war. I make me right.
Yes there was a war but only 1 side had nukes! You butted in as always & WRONGLY here as Red specifically stated " NUCLEAR WAR " & not a "REGULAR WAR" till one side found it had nukes !!!
If you dont like it snot face go find a Bandstand !
I'm sure someone will fight you there !
And then the REGULAR WAR became a NUCLEAR WAR. You know the bit when NUCLEAR BOMBS were used. That bit made it a NUCLEAR WAR. Nothing can change those FACTS.
No Max ,Wars only happen between 2 sides (min) . a REGULAR was ended by a Nuclear attack from 1 side with no response from the other except for surrender. 2 sides evenly matched with nukes have never as yet contested a"NUCLEAR WAR" hence why I asked Dwarf the Question . You'll get there one day Maxie but todays not that day !
Yes there was a war but only 1 side had nukes! You butted in as always & WRONGLY here as Red specifically stated " NUCLEAR WAR " & not a "REGULAR WAR" till one side found it had nukes !!!
If you dont like it snot face go find a Bandstand !
I'm sure someone will fight you there !
And then the REGULAR WAR became a NUCLEAR WAR. You know the bit when NUCLEAR BOMBS were used. That bit made it a NUCLEAR WAR. Nothing can change those FACTS.
No Max ,Wars only happen between 2 sides (min) . a REGULAR was ended by a Nuclear attack from 1 side with no response from the other except for surrender. 2 sides evenly matched with nukes have never as yet contested a"NUCLEAR WAR" hence why I asked Dwarf the Question . You'll get there one day Maxie but todays not that day !
The war was NOT, I repeat NOT ended by the first NUCLEAR ATTACK.
StillSpike wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:01 pm
If Russia nuke the West to bits before the West gets a shot off, then that'd still be a nuclear war, wouldn't it, even tho only one side used them?
I believe there is a certain logic in that. Don't expect Tufft""""""yyyyy will agree though. So looks like you are heading for a showdown at the Bandstand.
Russia isnt able to , Have you not seen how many satellites fly over Russias nuke sites ? Plus all the other u.s defence systems
Lets hope the ruskies IBM's won't collapse in on themselves like the ones in Azerbijan would of done as the silos werent fit for purpose when they started updating in the 70s & 80s
And then the REGULAR WAR became a NUCLEAR WAR. You know the bit when NUCLEAR BOMBS were used. That bit made it a NUCLEAR WAR. Nothing can change those FACTS.
No Max ,Wars only happen between 2 sides (min) . a REGULAR was ended by a Nuclear attack from 1 side with no response from the other except for surrender. 2 sides evenly matched with nukes have never as yet contested a"NUCLEAR WAR" hence why I asked Dwarf the Question . You'll get there one day Maxie but todays not that day !
The war was NOT, I repeat NOT ended by the first NUCLEAR ATTACK.
The 2nd attack helped . But lets not shift away from 2 sides with nukes !
No Max ,Wars only happen between 2 sides (min) . a REGULAR was ended by a Nuclear attack from 1 side with no response from the other except for surrender. 2 sides evenly matched with nukes have never as yet contested a"NUCLEAR WAR" hence why I asked Dwarf the Question . You'll get there one day Maxie but todays not that day !
The war was NOT, I repeat NOT ended by the first NUCLEAR ATTACK.
The 2nd attack helped .
So the Nuclear war was started and then intensified by the US and then it ended. Thank you. Phew - we finally got it over the line.