Re: Bankrupt councils
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2024 9:14 am
Death by 750 million cuts, more like.
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
And the only ones who benefit, as always, are the filthy, stinkin', dirty capitalist rats.Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 9:16 am One of the ironies of these cuts to public services, is that it then forces service providers into procurement decisions which are more expensive. This is happening throughout the education sector right now, with teachers opting for temp roles instead of full time positions.
There is no alternative, Maxy. Let it go mate.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:34 pmAnd the only ones who benefit, as always, are the filthy, stinkin', dirty capitalist rats.Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 9:16 am One of the ironies of these cuts to public services, is that it then forces service providers into procurement decisions which are more expensive. This is happening throughout the education sector right now, with teachers opting for temp roles instead of full time positions.
Enrichment for entrepreneurs, casualisation, insecurity and low remuneration for the workers.
If only there was someone radical enough to propose a mild social democratic alternative to full blown exploitation.
NeverHoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:47 pmThere is no alternative, Maxy. Let it go mate.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:34 pmAnd the only ones who benefit, as always, are the filthy, stinkin', dirty capitalist rats.Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 9:16 am One of the ironies of these cuts to public services, is that it then forces service providers into procurement decisions which are more expensive. This is happening throughout the education sector right now, with teachers opting for temp roles instead of full time positions.
Enrichment for entrepreneurs, casualisation, insecurity and low remuneration for the workers.
If only there was someone radical enough to propose a mild social democratic alternative to full blown exploitation.
SURELY it's cheaper to run a school bus service?Long slender neck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 2:38 pm https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2ljy1zx18zo
Council spends £6m on taxis to take children to school.
40% of the kids but 20% of the cost.Long slender neck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:25 pm Its not just Send kids, the council have to pay for transport for any kid living more than 3 miles from school. Over 40% in this case did not have special needs.
The real question here is how did anyone even notice the rubbish wasn't being collected.faldO wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:59 am "Binmageddon" in Birmingham.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckgnp7m ... 26e9e#post
In Scotland its a 1 mile rule for secondary its 2 miles. You guys are so backward. Its not about cost but child safety.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:17 am40% of the kids but 20% of the cost.Long slender neck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:25 pm Its not just Send kids, the council have to pay for transport for any kid living more than 3 miles from school. Over 40% in this case did not have special needs.
That 3 mile rule has been around forever and isn't the issue here.
So you’re saying child predators are more dangerous in Scotland?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:20 amIn Scotland its a 1 mile rule for secondary its 2 miles. You guys are so backward. Its not about cost but child safety.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:17 am40% of the kids but 20% of the cost.Long slender neck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:25 pm Its not just Send kids, the council have to pay for transport for any kid living more than 3 miles from school. Over 40% in this case did not have special needs.
That 3 mile rule has been around forever and isn't the issue here.
I have rechecked my post and can't find that I've said that.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:26 amSo you’re saying child predators are more dangerous in Scotland?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:20 amIn Scotland its a 1 mile rule for secondary its 2 miles. You guys are so backward. Its not about cost but child safety.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:17 am
40% of the kids but 20% of the cost.
That 3 mile rule has been around forever and isn't the issue here.
Why is it so dangerous for kids to take public transport or walk to school in Scotland!?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:29 amI have rechecked my post and can't find that I've said that.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:26 amSo you’re saying child predators are more dangerous in Scotland?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:20 am
In Scotland its a 1 mile rule for secondary its 2 miles. You guys are so backward. Its not about cost but child safety.
Is it?Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:30 amWhy is it so dangerous for kids to walk to school in Scotland!?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:29 amI have rechecked my post and can't find that I've said that.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:26 am
So you’re saying child predators are more dangerous in Scotland?
Well if they need a cab if they live 1-2 miles away for child safety then apparently soMax B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:31 amIs it?Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:30 amWhy is it so dangerous for kids to walk to school in Scotland!?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:29 am
I have rechecked my post and can't find that I've said that.
Interesting, what’s the child safety concern though?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:37 am It's a bus actually. Cabs serve the rural population and kids in LA care/ foster care
Traffic?Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:38 amInteresting, what’s the child safety concern though?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:37 am It's a bus actually. Cabs serve the rural population and kids in LA care/ foster care