Thor wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:52 pm
However, he can't defend, he can't cross, doesn't track back quickly enough, 90% of the time he passes backwards or at his most adventurous sideways.
I honestly can't believe people think that Judd is an 'attacking' full back. He's not even more 'attacking' than Ling. He's tenacious and gets stuck in, but he's not the sort of player who flies up and down the wing, getting crosses in.
There's no comparison between them offensively.
Judd will look to go forward as soon as we pick up the ball. He will provide another option. Even if doesn't get it, he occupies another defender. Ling will hold his position, some unkinder than me would say he hides. This is without doubt the biggest difference between the pair and the main reason I'd plump for Judd every single time.
I find it incredible that you watch games and come to that conclusion.
I find it incredible that you watch games and don’t come to that conclusion.
Judd will look to go forward as soon as we pick up the ball. He will provide another option. Even if doesn't get it, he occupies another defender. Ling will hold his position, some unkinder than me would say he hides. This is without doubt the biggest difference between the pair and the main reason I'd plump for Judd every single time.
I find it incredible that you watch games and come to that conclusion.
I find it incredible that you watch games and don’t come to that conclusion.
Doh, have you ever seen events unfolding and managed to either completely misinterpret them, misjudge what was going to happen next, or back the wrong outcome? Have you ever done that?
I find it incredible that you watch games and come to that conclusion.
I find it incredible that you watch games and don’t come to that conclusion.
Doh, have you ever seen events unfolding and managed to either completely misinterpret them, misjudge what was going to happen next, or back the wrong outcome? Have you ever done that?
I find it incredible that you watch games and don’t come to that conclusion.
Doh, have you ever seen events unfolding and managed to either completely misinterpret them, misjudge what was going to happen next, or back the wrong outcome? Have you ever done that?
I find it incredible that you watch games and come to that conclusion.
I find it incredible that you watch games and don’t come to that conclusion.
Doh, have you ever seen events unfolding and managed to either completely misinterpret them, misjudge what was going to happen next, or back the wrong outcome? Have you ever done that?
I find it incredible that you watch games and don’t come to that conclusion.
Doh, have you ever seen events unfolding and managed to either completely misinterpret them, misjudge what was going to happen next, or back the wrong outcome? Have you ever done that?
Like dOh would ever do that. Get a grip man.
Especially as it related to someone else’s post. I dare not agree with anybody if it opposes the Red Army opinion. Hey ho. RA don’t like me Max. I have to live with that. Tough as it is.
Doh, have you ever seen events unfolding and managed to either completely misinterpret them, misjudge what was going to happen next, or back the wrong outcome? Have you ever done that?
Like dOh would ever do that. Get a grip man.
Especially as it related to someone else’s post. I dare not agree with anybody if it opposes the Red Army opinion. Hey ho. RA don’t like me Max. I have to live with that. Tough as it is.
I don't even know you so how could I like or dislike you? What I don't like is your opinions on certain matters, current and historical.
I find it incredible that you watch games and come to that conclusion.
I find it incredible that you watch games and don’t come to that conclusion.
Doh, have you ever seen events unfolding and managed to either completely misinterpret them, misjudge what was going to happen next, or back the wrong outcome? Have you ever done that?
Especially as it related to someone else’s post. I dare not agree with anybody if it opposes the Red Army opinion. Hey ho. RA don’t like me Max. I have to live with that. Tough as it is.
I don't even know you so how could I like or dislike you? What I don't like is your opinions on certain matters, current and historical.
I sense that no matter what I post you seem only too willing to pick fault, so I respond in kind, or to put it better, respond in unkind. I’m sure if you knew me you would love me instantly.
Especially as it related to someone else’s post. I dare not agree with anybody if it opposes the Red Army opinion. Hey ho. RA don’t like me Max. I have to live with that. Tough as it is.
I don't even know you so how could I like or dislike you? What I don't like is your opinions on certain matters, current and historical.
I sense that no matter what I post you seem only too willing to pick fault, so I respond in kind, or to put it better, respond in unkind. I’m sure if you knew me you would love me instantly.
I don't even know you so how could I like or dislike you? What I don't like is your opinions on certain matters, current and historical.
I sense that no matter what I post you seem only too willing to pick fault, so I respond in kind, or to put it better, respond in unkind. I’m sure if you knew me you would love me instantly.
I only pick fault where I see fault.
Looked in the mirror lately.
Re: The Ling Interview
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:40 pm
by Max B Gold
Thread is a belter.
Re: The Ling Interview
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:48 pm
by Thor
Talking of belters, check this lockwood classic out! Voiced by the club book licker and apologist Andy Gilson in his finest Brian Moore copy cat tone.
I sense that no matter what I post you seem only too willing to pick fault, so I respond in kind, or to put it better, respond in unkind. I’m sure if you knew me you would love me instantly.
I only pick fault where I see fault.
Looked in the mirror lately.
It's like being back in school.
Re: The Ling Interview
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:11 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:48 pm
Talking of belters, check this lockwood classic out! Voiced by the club book licker and apologist Andy Gilson in his finest Brian Moore copy cat tone.
A perfect example of stating the blooming obvious .
The monotoned master Tony Gubba would have changed pitch for that belter of a goal .
Re: The Ling Interview
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:15 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:40 pm
Thread is a belter.
Trying to think of an appropriate hash tag Max but can’t beat your one so
Of course, there we go. Ok to tirelessly have digs at a young player & you let it carry on. Yet a bit of criticism in return & you go all snowflakey.
So, to make this clear, you are saying it is okay to make jokes about mental illness?
Don’t really want to get involved other that to suggest someone is physically and mentally tired is not making jokes about mental illness, just talking about fatigue. That’s how I see it.
It’s a fine line Prez. Best not to stray into the territory.
Like dOh would ever do that. Get a grip man.