Independent Leyton Orient Forum

RedO wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:12 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:12 pm

RedO wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:00 pm Well if all the Tories like him, he must have something.

Let's all get behind the Starmer team and cheer them all the way to Westminster.

I might have a change of heart and hang around after all, sniping from the sidelines and trying to discredit him at every turn. That’s what we’re supposed to do, isn’t it?

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 7:34 pm Just been sent this.

"In 2009, the paedophile Jimmy Savile was interviewed under caution by police in Surrey and Sussex. Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the CPS alleging that Jimmy Savile had abused 3 girls under the age of 16.
The CPS, after receiving the files from the police, refused to prosecute Savile and dropped the case claiming ‘insufficient evidence’’.
After Savile’s death, and despite multiple attempts of high level cover ups, we now know that he abused up to 500 victims over a four-decade period.
Why am I sharing this with you?
The man in charge of the CPS at the time, that decided there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Savile, is the now Leader of the Labour Party Sir Kier Starmer."

Oh dear it seems he's a wrongun as well. Why don't that surprise me. I was most disappointed in Watson who I thought was going to rid Westminster of all the wronguns and unfortunately they all closed ranks.

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 7:34 pm Just been sent this.

"In 2009, the paedophile Jimmy Savile was interviewed under caution by police in Surrey and Sussex. Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the CPS alleging that Jimmy Savile had abused 3 girls under the age of 16.
The CPS, after receiving the files from the police, refused to prosecute Savile and dropped the case claiming ‘insufficient evidence’’.
After Savile’s death, and despite multiple attempts of high level cover ups, we now know that he abused up to 500 victims over a four-decade period.
Why am I sharing this with you?
The man in charge of the CPS at the time, that decided there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Savile, is the now Leader of the Labour Party Sir Kier Starmer."

Oh dear it seems he's a wrongun as well. Why don't that surprise me. I was most disappointed in Watson who I thought was going to rid Westminster of all the wronguns and unfortunately they all closed ranks.

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 7:34 pm Just been sent this.

"In 2009, the paedophile Jimmy Savile was interviewed under caution by police in Surrey and Sussex. Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the CPS alleging that Jimmy Savile had abused 3 girls under the age of 16.
The CPS, after receiving the files from the police, refused to prosecute Savile and dropped the case claiming ‘insufficient evidence’’.
After Savile’s death, and despite multiple attempts of high level cover ups, we now know that he abused up to 500 victims over a four-decade period.
Why am I sharing this with you?
The man in charge of the CPS at the time, that decided there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Savile, is the now Leader of the Labour Party Sir Kier Starmer."

Oh dear it seems he's a wrongun as well. Why don't that surprise me. I was most disappointed in Watson who I thought was going to rid Westminster of all the wronguns and unfortunately they all closed ranks.

Admin wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 9:50 pm Deep joy. Illuminaries such as Matt Forde, Tony Robinson and Frances Barber rejoining labour is making me seriously consider chucking my membership in.
I don’t see why fannies like this who openly encouraged anti-labour voting should be readmitted.

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 7:34 pm Just been sent this.

"In 2009, the paedophile Jimmy Savile was interviewed under caution by police in Surrey and Sussex. Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the CPS alleging that Jimmy Savile had abused 3 girls under the age of 16.
The CPS, after receiving the files from the police, refused to prosecute Savile and dropped the case claiming ‘insufficient evidence’’.
After Savile’s death, and despite multiple attempts of high level cover ups, we now know that he abused up to 500 victims over a four-decade period.
Why am I sharing this with you?
The man in charge of the CPS at the time, that decided there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Savile, is the now Leader of the Labour Party Sir Kier Starmer."

Oh dear it seems he's a wrongun as well. Why don't that surprise me. I was most disappointed in Watson who I thought was going to rid Westminster of all the wronguns and unfortunately they all closed ranks.

Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:14 pm

Thor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 7:34 pm Just been sent this.

"In 2009, the paedophile Jimmy Savile was interviewed under caution by police in Surrey and Sussex. Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the CPS alleging that Jimmy Savile had abused 3 girls under the age of 16.
The CPS, after receiving the files from the police, refused to prosecute Savile and dropped the case claiming ‘insufficient evidence’’.
After Savile’s death, and despite multiple attempts of high level cover ups, we now know that he abused up to 500 victims over a four-decade period.
Why am I sharing this with you?
The man in charge of the CPS at the time, that decided there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Savile, is the now Leader of the Labour Party Sir Kier Starmer."

Oh dear it seems he's a wrongun as well. Why don't that surprise me. I was most disappointed in Watson who I thought was going to rid Westminster of all the wronguns and unfortunately they all closed ranks.

Tiresomely predictable.

Redline wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 11:47 pm As I understand it the CPS review the evidence and only spend public money if there is a reasonable chance of success. If Starmer didn’t proceed the issue will be one of a lack of evidence. Not his fault and the correct decision if others didn’t do their jobs well enough.

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 3:54 pm

RedO wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:12 pm

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:12 pm

Let's all get behind the Starmer team and cheer them all the way to Westminster.

I might have a change of heart and hang around after all, sniping from the sidelines and trying to discredit him at every turn. That’s what we’re supposed to do, isn’t it?

Sniping from the sidelines will not be enough.

You should ally yourself with anyone you can to launch a propoganda campaign to discredit the leadership up to and including a full blown coup.

I will get back to you on how this can be funded. There are several interested parties.

RedO wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:09 am

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 3:54 pm

RedO wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:12 pm

I might have a change of heart and hang around after all, sniping from the sidelines and trying to discredit him at every turn. That’s what we’re supposed to do, isn’t it?

Sniping from the sidelines will not be enough.

You should ally yourself with anyone you can to launch a propoganda campaign to discredit the leadership up to and including a full blown coup.

I will get back to you on how this can be funded. There are several interested parties.

That’s one option.

The other is to give our tenner a month to the Greens, now the only mainstream party with anything socialist tendencies.

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:40 am Great to see finally the end of the failed experiment in socialism and the back of the worst leader the Labour Party have ever had.

The return of the centrists will also mean goodbye to Lansman, Formby and the other Momentum apparatchiks.

Happy days.

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 1:01 am

RedO wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:09 am
The other is to give our tenner a month to the Greens, now the only mainstream party with anything socialist tendencies.

What is in the least bit socialist about nut munching, sandal wearing middle class do gooders?

RedO wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:34 am

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:40 am Great to see finally the end of the failed experiment in socialism and the back of the worst leader the Labour Party have ever had.

The return of the centrists will also mean goodbye to Lansman, Formby and the other Momentum apparatchiks.

Happy days.

If socialism is a failed experiment, why do we have to keep resorting to it every few years?

RedO wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:34 am

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:40 am Great to see finally the end of the failed experiment in socialism and the back of the worst leader the Labour Party have ever had.

The return of the centrists will also mean goodbye to Lansman, Formby and the other Momentum apparatchiks.

Happy days.

If socialism is a failed experiment, why do we have to keep resorting to it every few years?

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:40 am Great to see finally the end of the failed experiment in socialism and the back of the worst leader the Labour Party have ever had.

The return of the centrists will also mean goodbye to Lansman, Formby and the other Momentum apparatchiks.

Happy days.

Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:21 am

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:40 am Great to see finally the end of the failed experiment in socialism and the back of the worst leader the Labour Party have ever had.

The return of the centrists will also mean goodbye to Lansman, Formby and the other Momentum apparatchiks.

Happy days.

Tories seem to be experimenting with socialism atm and their voters are oddly lapping it up

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 11:56 pm

Redline wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 11:47 pm As I understand it the CPS review the evidence and only spend public money if there is a reasonable chance of success. If Starmer didn’t proceed the issue will be one of a lack of evidence. Not his fault and the correct decision if others didn’t do their jobs well enough.

Are you saying Starmer reviewed this evidence?