Re: Farage on Marr
Posted: Mon May 13, 2019 7:48 pm
That the Bay City Rollers were a good band.
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
That the Bay City Rollers were a good band.
Us lot? I’m not a remainer, if that’s what you’re thinking.Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 2:15 pmAnd you don't understand the repercussions by staying in. You have no idea what those Eurocrats are drumming up in their minds for the future.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 1:42 pm That's because they don't understand the repercussions of no deal.
So maybe you lot are dumb too.
It was all only going to be about trade and that's it . Ted Heath later admitted it was also going to be about political and monetary union but by then the vote had already been taken . If you truth had have been told back then , then I believe we would never had joined in the first place .
Didn't claim I had spoke to 17 M people. However unlike you I speak to the public everyday, since before and after the referendum, during run up to referendum it was clear what the public was thinking and how they would vote, you are just another remoaner who clearly thought they know better and can't stand the fact Joe Soap knows better than youEH16 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 4:31 pmYou are so wrong if you took the time to speak to the people who voted Brexit instead of slagging everyone off who disagrees with you, you will find most if not all just wanted out, walk away, give them nothing, in other words NO DEAL - You have no more spoken to 17M people than I have so your assertion is meaningless.Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 4:00 pmYes, well said point nine.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 1:36 pm
You are so wrong if you took the time to speak to the people who voted Brexit instead of slagging everyone off who disagrees with you, you will find most if not all just wanted out, walk away, give them nothing, in other words NO DEAL
This is so easy.
No offence, but I'm not going to click on any Express links.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 12:57 amIt was all only going to be about trade and that's it . Ted Heath later admitted it was also going to be about political and monetary union but by then the vote had already been taken . If you truth had have been told back then , then I believe we would never had joined in the first place .
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/10488 ... -entry-spt
Is it really any wonder I consider myself smarter than you when you continue to make unsupported assertions.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 2:53 amDidn't claim I had spoke to 17 M people. However unlike you I speak to the public everyday, since before and after the referendum, during run up to referendum it was clear what the public was thinking and how they would vote, you are just another remoaner who clearly thought they know better and can't stand the fact Joe Soap knows better than youEH16 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 4:31 pmYou are so wrong if you took the time to speak to the people who voted Brexit instead of slagging everyone off who disagrees with you, you will find most if not all just wanted out, walk away, give them nothing, in other words NO DEAL - You have no more spoken to 17M people than I have so your assertion is meaningless.
If you were in close contact with the public how come you couldn't see they were going to vote brexit. How much of a win do you want for you to accept democracy, Do you remember the pack of lies in the government leaflet sent to us all illegally, promising us all an emergency budget within days, mass unemployment, failing economy disaster all round, we was even promised a third world war, this was project fear which Joe Soap saw through and rejected soundly. It was a disgrace that a British government set out to scare the population with all their lies, but you Conveniently forget that.EH16 wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 8:50 amIs it really any wonder I consider myself smarter than you when you continue to make unsupported assertions.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 2:53 amDidn't claim I had spoke to 17 M people. However unlike you I speak to the public everyday, since before and after the referendum, during run up to referendum it was clear what the public was thinking and how they would vote, you are just another remoaner who clearly thought they know better and can't stand the fact Joe Soap knows better than youEH16 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 4:31 pm
You are so wrong if you took the time to speak to the people who voted Brexit instead of slagging everyone off who disagrees with you, you will find most if not all just wanted out, walk away, give them nothing, in other words NO DEAL - You have no more spoken to 17M people than I have so your assertion is meaningless.
However unlike you I speak to the public everyday, - you have no knowledge of what I do every day, you're just making a statement with no basis in fact.
it was clear what the public was thinking First, not that clear since the vote was NOT the massive majority people like you are now making it out to be. Second, have you STILL not grasped that what leavers were thinking was based on A COMPLETE PACK OF LIES
Joe Soap knows better than you No, he doesn't (see above re A COMPLETE PACK OF LIES)
you forgot to mention not joining the EURO would see us falling of the edge of the world.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 9:13 amIf you were in close contact with the public how come you couldn't see they were going to vote brexit. How much of a win do you want for you to accept democracy, Do you remember the pack of lies in the government leaflet sent to us all illegally, promising us all an emergency budget within days, mass unemployment, failing economy disaster all round, we was even promised a third world war, this was project fear which Joe Soap saw through and rejected soundly. It was a disgrace that a British government set out to scare the population with all their lies, but you Conveniently forget that.EH16 wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 8:50 amIs it really any wonder I consider myself smarter than you when you continue to make unsupported assertions.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 2:53 am
Didn't claim I had spoke to 17 M people. However unlike you I speak to the public everyday, since before and after the referendum, during run up to referendum it was clear what the public was thinking and how they would vote, you are just another remoaner who clearly thought they know better and can't stand the fact Joe Soap knows better than you
However unlike you I speak to the public everyday, - you have no knowledge of what I do every day, you're just making a statement with no basis in fact.
it was clear what the public was thinking First, not that clear since the vote was NOT the massive majority people like you are now making it out to be. Second, have you STILL not grasped that what leavers were thinking was based on A COMPLETE PACK OF LIES
Joe Soap knows better than you No, he doesn't (see above re A COMPLETE PACK OF LIES)
I would say an advocate for implementing the results of the original referendum.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 8:46 am
Excellent, another advocate for a second ref. Knew there were more out more on the Board, silent majority and all that.
That should have been the outcome of the original vote.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 9:59 am So let's have a second referendum then, take it out the MPs hands.
greyhound wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 9:27 amyou forgot to mention not joining the EURO would see us falling of the edge of the world.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 9:13 amIf you were in close contact with the public how come you couldn't see they were going to vote brexit. How much of a win do you want for you to accept democracy, Do you remember the pack of lies in the government leaflet sent to us all illegally, promising us all an emergency budget within days, mass unemployment, failing economy disaster all round, we was even promised a third world war, this was project fear which Joe Soap saw through and rejected soundly. It was a disgrace that a British government set out to scare the population with all their lies, but you Conveniently forget that.EH16 wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 8:50 am
Is it really any wonder I consider myself smarter than you when you continue to make unsupported assertions.
However unlike you I speak to the public everyday, - you have no knowledge of what I do every day, you're just making a statement with no basis in fact.
it was clear what the public was thinking First, not that clear since the vote was NOT the massive majority people like you are now making it out to be. Second, have you STILL not grasped that what leavers were thinking was based on A COMPLETE PACK OF LIES
Joe Soap knows better than you No, he doesn't (see above re A COMPLETE PACK OF LIES)
Couldn't be more democratic if remoaners accepted result of first Referendum.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 9:59 am So let's have a second referendum then, take it out the MPs hands. Three options:
Leave with an agreed deal
Leave on WTO terms
Remain
Couldn't be more democratic.
Ah, so you're not actually interested in people having their say? Thanks for clarifying.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 10:19 amCouldn't be more democratic if remoaners accepted result of first Referendum.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 9:59 am So let's have a second referendum then, take it out the MPs hands. Three options:
Leave with an agreed deal
Leave on WTO terms
Remain
Couldn't be more democratic.
Clever idea of yours to split leave vote so Remoaners have biggest percentage vote, you only want democracy on your terms
For goodness sake!Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 11:02 amAh, so you're not actually interested in people having their say? Thanks for clarifying.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 10:19 amCouldn't be more democratic if remoaners accepted result of first Referendum.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 9:59 am So let's have a second referendum then, take it out the MPs hands. Three options:
Leave with an agreed deal
Leave on WTO terms
Remain
Couldn't be more democratic.
Clever idea of yours to split leave vote so Remoaners have biggest percentage vote, you only want democracy on your terms
This exactly.Winchesterfan wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 11:10 amFor goodness sake!Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 11:02 amAh, so you're not actually interested in people having their say? Thanks for clarifying.point nine one eight wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 10:19 am
Couldn't be more democratic if remoaners accepted result of first Referendum.
Clever idea of yours to split leave vote so Remoaners have biggest percentage vote, you only want democracy on your terms
People HAD their say with the original referendum. That was democracy and the result should have been carried out. No ifs no buts.
What IS your problem in not accepting the result?
Trouble with people like yourselves posting in this thread is you are simplifying the most complex constitutional and political problem in a century into the line 'the people have spoken.' There's no hint of acknowledgement of the scale of the task. This isn't just about leaving the political institutions of the EU, it's about rewiring the entire economic, political and cultural framework of a country of 65 million odd. And you keep boiling that down into soundbites. Impossible to take that seriously really.Thor wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 11:46 amThis exactly.Winchesterfan wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 11:10 amFor goodness sake!Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2019 11:02 am
Ah, so you're not actually interested in people having their say? Thanks for clarifying.
People HAD their say with the original referendum. That was democracy and the result should have been carried out. No ifs no buts.
What IS your problem in not accepting the result?
Trouble with PJ and people like him they want what they want and so they want to ignore the democratic will of the people cos it don't fit in with their agenda. If leave had lost then I'd have been, cool it's done we move on.