Page 5 of 6

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:24 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
No, the OP was saying in his usual hyperbolic way that this signing was a distraction. That is, of course, absolute tosh.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:12 pm
by Redcard
I get excited about all new signings, at least until I have seen them play half a dozen times.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:23 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
:| 8-)
RedO wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:24 pm No, the OP was saying in his usual hyperbolic way that this signing was a distraction. That is, of course, absolute tosh.
You, as usual, forgot to put IMO !!!!

IMO , it is not tosh

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:02 pm
by Thor
Its is not a distraction, signings take time to deliver and the fact it was announced more or less as soon as the window opens is a positive in my view.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:41 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:23 pm :| 8-)
RedO wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:24 pm No, the OP was saying in his usual hyperbolic way that this signing was a distraction. That is, of course, absolute tosh.
You, as usual, forgot to put IMO !!!!

IMO , it is not tosh
No, it’s not my opinion, it’s definitely tosh.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:16 pm
by faith1234
I am not going to get excited about new signing as we new a new manager first as it wont make a diffence

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:20 pm
by faith1234
Sorry need a new manager

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:00 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
RedO wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:41 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:23 pm :| 8-)
RedO wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:24 pm No, the OP was saying in his usual hyperbolic way that this signing was a distraction. That is, of course, absolute tosh.
You, as usual, forgot to put IMO !!!!

IMO , it is not tosh
No, it’s not my opinion, it’s definitely tosh.
No,.....it isn't tosh
What you're saying is tosh

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:49 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:00 pm
RedO wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:41 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:23 pm :| 8-)
You, as usual, forgot to put IMO !!!!

IMO , it is not tosh
No, it’s not my opinion, it’s definitely tosh.
No,.....it isn't tosh
What you're saying is tosh
You're talking paranoid tosh. It's indisputable.

Just because you don't like the club management structure and personnel that doesn't mean that they shouldn't be improving the squad and team.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:35 pm
by Chief crazy horse
What you really mean is just because you don't like a differing view to your own. You have an intolerant outlook.
And no one is saying that we shouldn't be improving the squad, so you're just talking unadulterated tosh.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:27 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
But yes, that’s exactly what comeonyouos is saying. The reason we have signed this goalkeeper, thereby improving our starting eleven never mind the squad, is purely to dupe us fans. It’s not been done to improve the starting eleven.

That’s clearly tosh, isn’t it.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:00 am
by faith1234
Thete seems to be a lot of TOSH going around tonight⚽⚽⚽⚽

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:24 am
by ComeOnYouOs
Shall we try and get a bit more clarity into all this?
Obviously, the team needs strengthening, no team needs it more than this, by bringing in the keeper, they are improving the team, but as a side issue it acts as a distraction...........give the fans a new player, and they'll forget the balls up we have made of the managerial situation.
Cant see how some cant see that

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:31 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
You ain’t right.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:31 am
by Lucky7
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:24 am Shall we try and get a bit more clarity into all this?
Obviously, the team needs strengthening, no team needs it more than this, by bringing in the keeper, they are improving the team, but as a side issue it acts as a distraction...........give the fans a new player, and they'll forget the balls up we have made of the managerial situation.
Cant see how some cant see that
God your so wise😂😂

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:32 am
by Disoriented
Hopefully the midfield dynamo will be in by Monday.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:37 am
by Smendrick Feaselberg
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:24 am Shall we try and get a bit more clarity into all this?
Obviously, the team needs strengthening, no team needs it more than this, by bringing in the keeper, they are improving the team, but as a side issue it acts as a distraction...........give the fans a new player, and they'll forget the balls up we have made of the managerial situation.
Cant see how some cant see that
According to the league table other teams need strengthening more than Orient.

You really are paranoid to say it serves as a distraction when the management are doing their jobs. Are they supposed to just dwell on the managerial ballsup or put it behind them and focus on improving? Do you really think people will accept future poor results and performances just because we've signed a good keeper (and likely other players too)?

Think you need to quit while you're behind on this one.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 1:11 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:37 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:24 am Shall we try and get a bit more clarity into all this?
Obviously, the team needs strengthening, no team needs it more than this, by bringing in the keeper, they are improving the team, but as a side issue it acts as a distraction...........give the fans a new player, and they'll forget the balls up we have made of the managerial situation.
Cant see how some cant see that
According to the league table other teams need strengthening more than Orient.

You really are paranoid to say it serves as a distraction when the management are doing their jobs. Are they supposed to just dwell on the managerial ballsup or put it behind them and focus on improving? Do you really think people will accept future poor results and performances just because we've signed a good keeper (and likely other players too)?

Think you need to quit while you're behind on this one.
Ha Ha.just listen to yourself!!!!!

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:18 pm
by Chief crazy horse
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:37 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:24 am Shall we try and get a bit more clarity into all this?
Obviously, the team needs strengthening, no team needs it more than this, by bringing in the keeper, they are improving the team, but as a side issue it acts as a distraction...........give the fans a new player, and they'll forget the balls up we have made of the managerial situation.
Cant see how some cant see that
According to the league table other teams need strengthening more than Orient.

You really are paranoid to say it serves as a distraction when the management are doing their jobs. Are they supposed to just dwell on the managerial ballsup or put it behind them and focus on improving? Do you really think people will accept future poor results and performances just because we've signed a good keeper (and likely other players too)?

Think you need to quit while you're behind on this one.
Hello Smen,seems you are just arguing for arguing sake now . I mean, anyone with any foresight or are able to read between the lines, will know that all the original poster was saying is that there is a much more bigger problem to deal with rather than getting carried away or distracted by a new signing. He has never said that we shouldn't be signing new players as you are saying in order to enforce your argument home. In fact he did say, 'that it seems a decent signing'.
So, I don't know what you're rambling on about. You're making something out of nothing. Best to stop embarrassing yourself.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:24 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
The only two embarassing themselves are those suggesting we’ve signed a keeper as a distraction, to throw us a few crumbs, they’re the words used.

It’s laughable. We’ve signed a new keeper because we needed one, and because this lad appears to be an improvement on what we’ve already got.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:03 pm
by Max B Gold
RedO wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:24 pm The only two embarassing themselves are those suggesting we’ve signed a keeper as a distraction, to throw us a few crumbs, they’re the words used.

It’s laughable. We’ve signed a new keeper because we needed one, and because this lad appears to be an improvement on what we’ve already got.
What? Better than Brill? You were quick to dump your old favourite.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:10 am
by Smendrick Feaselberg
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 1:11 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:37 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:24 am Shall we try and get a bit more clarity into all this?
Obviously, the team needs strengthening, no team needs it more than this, by bringing in the keeper, they are improving the team, but as a side issue it acts as a distraction...........give the fans a new player, and they'll forget the balls up we have made of the managerial situation.
Cant see how some cant see that
According to the league table other teams need strengthening more than Orient.

You really are paranoid to say it serves as a distraction when the management are doing their jobs. Are they supposed to just dwell on the managerial ballsup or put it behind them and focus on improving? Do you really think people will accept future poor results and performances just because we've signed a good keeper (and likely other players too)?

Think you need to quit while you're behind on this one.
Ha Ha.just listen to yourself!!!!!
You know it would probably have been best all round if you'd followed through on your threat to stop supporting the team because you didn't like last season's new kit.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:12 am
by Smendrick Feaselberg
Chief crazy horse wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:18 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:37 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:24 am Shall we try and get a bit more clarity into all this?
Obviously, the team needs strengthening, no team needs it more than this, by bringing in the keeper, they are improving the team, but as a side issue it acts as a distraction...........give the fans a new player, and they'll forget the balls up we have made of the managerial situation.
Cant see how some cant see that
According to the league table other teams need strengthening more than Orient.

You really are paranoid to say it serves as a distraction when the management are doing their jobs. Are they supposed to just dwell on the managerial ballsup or put it behind them and focus on improving? Do you really think people will accept future poor results and performances just because we've signed a good keeper (and likely other players too)?

Think you need to quit while you're behind on this one.
Hello Smen,seems you are just arguing for arguing sake now . I mean, anyone with any foresight or are able to read between the lines, will know that all the original poster was saying is that there is a much more bigger problem to deal with rather than getting carried away or distracted by a new signing. He has never said that we shouldn't be signing new players as you are saying in order to enforce your argument home. In fact he did say, 'that it seems a decent signing'.
So, I don't know what you're rambling on about. You're making something out of nothing. Best to stop embarrassing yourself.
The only making something out of nothing is claiming that signing a good quality keeper is a distraction. As RedO says, the only embarrassing is being done by you and ComeOnYouOs too. Time for you to follow his lead and quit while you're behind.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:15 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:03 pm
RedO wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:24 pm The only two embarassing themselves are those suggesting we’ve signed a keeper as a distraction, to throw us a few crumbs, they’re the words used.

It’s laughable. We’ve signed a new keeper because we needed one, and because this lad appears to be an improvement on what we’ve already got.
What? Better than Brill? You were quick to dump your old favourite.
I know but you have to move on and accept what’s best for the team.

Re: Signing at 4.30pm

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:17 am
by Smendrick Feaselberg
RedO wrote: Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:15 am
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:03 pm
RedO wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:24 pm The only two embarassing themselves are those suggesting we’ve signed a keeper as a distraction, to throw us a few crumbs, they’re the words used.

It’s laughable. We’ve signed a new keeper because we needed one, and because this lad appears to be an improvement on what we’ve already got.
What? Better than Brill? You were quick to dump your old favourite.
I know but you have to move on and accept what’s best for the team.
Wonder if he will go back to just coaching from next summer.