West Side Story wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:34 am
I remember many many years ago, before all this paedo stuff, the press used to refer to him as Randy Andy. He seemed to wear this as a badge of honour. Lock him up!
If he did what’s alleged then I have no sympathy for him and he deserves all he gets. If it was my daughter I’d hunt him down, make no mistake about that.
However, from what been in the press he is not a paedo, as the girl was 17, whilst underage she is certainly not pre pubescent.
How far under the age limit are you allowed to go Thor, before you consider someone to be a paedo?
West Side Story wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:34 am
I remember many many years ago, before all this paedo stuff, the press used to refer to him as Randy Andy. He seemed to wear this as a badge of honour. Lock him up!
If he did what’s alleged then I have no sympathy for him and he deserves all he gets. If it was my daughter I’d hunt him down, make no mistake about that.
However, from what been in the press he is not a paedo, as the girl was 17, whilst underage she is certainly not pre pubescent.
If that is the case uk law states its ok does it not ?
Is this something Spen should expand on ?
In the U.S it 16-18 depending on what state you are in .
Can you imagine that .
A country having different age levels of legal & illegal.
West Side Story wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:34 am
I remember many many years ago, before all this paedo stuff, the press used to refer to him as Randy Andy. He seemed to wear this as a badge of honour. Lock him up!
If he did what’s alleged then I have no sympathy for him and he deserves all he gets. If it was my daughter I’d hunt him down, make no mistake about that.
However, from what been in the press he is not a paedo, as the girl was 17, whilst underage she is certainly not pre pubescent.
If that is the case uk law states its ok does it not ?
Is this something Spen should expand on ?
In the U.S it 16-18 depending on what state you are in .
Can you imagine that .
A country having different age levels of legal & illegal.
Not sure I understand fully what you are asking me to clarify, so if I misunderstand let me know.
In the UK the age of consent is 16 . So you can have sex with a 16 year old, irrespective of how much older you are than them. The one exception to this that comes immediately to mind is teachers ( & I think others in similar role- but would need to look that up) who can't have sex with someone they have taught until person is 18 years of age. Strangely teacher could have sex with pupil the day they turn 18 even if still teaching them at school.
If he did what’s alleged then I have no sympathy for him and he deserves all he gets. If it was my daughter I’d hunt him down, make no mistake about that.
However, from what been in the press he is not a paedo, as the girl was 17, whilst underage she is certainly not pre pubescent.
If that is the case uk law states its ok does it not ?
Is this something Spen should expand on ?
In the U.S it 16-18 depending on what state you are in .
Can you imagine that .
A country having different age levels of legal & illegal.
Not sure I understand fully what you are asking me to clarify, so if I misunderstand let me know.
In the UK the age of consent is 16 . So you can have sex with a 16 year old, irrespective of how much older you are than them. The one exception to this that comes immediately to mind is teachers ( & I think others in similar role- but would need to look that up) who can't have sex with someone they have taught until person is 18 years of age. Strangely teacher could have sex with pupil the day they turn 18 even if still teaching them at school.
No that was all clarification That was Needed.
Morally can be another argument ,
But that is a different can of worms .
Just 1 further Question spen,
why would the yanks have a range of ages ?
Seems very strange that.
Re: Prince Andrew
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:42 pm
by tuffers#1
West Side Story wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:34 am
I remember many many years ago, before all this paedo stuff, the press used to refer to him as Randy Andy. He seemed to wear this as a badge of honour. Lock him up!
Re: Prince Andrew
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:53 pm
by spen666
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:40 pm
.....
No that was all clarification That was Needed.
Morally can be another argument ,
But that is a different can of worms .
Just 1 further Question spen,
why would the yanks have a range of ages ?
Seems very strange that.
The USA is made up of 50 states. Each states is like a separate country and sets its own laws on most things. Imagine the US as being like the EU. Different EU "states" set their own laws on things like age of consent. The US is the same.
If he did what’s alleged then I have no sympathy for him and he deserves all he gets. If it was my daughter I’d hunt him down, make no mistake about that.
However, from what been in the press he is not a paedo, as the girl was 17, whilst underage she is certainly not pre pubescent.
If that is the case uk law states its ok does it not ?
Is this something Spen should expand on ?
In the U.S it 16-18 depending on what state you are in .
Can you imagine that .
A country having different age levels of legal & illegal.
Strangely teacher could have sex with pupil the day they turn 18 even if still teaching them at school.
Bit embarassing with the rest of the class looking on, dont you think?
Anybody else think that ‘dark forces’ were behind Epstein’s ‘suicide’ ??
Re: Prince Andrew
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:45 pm
by Thor
Defo
Re: Prince Andrew
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:53 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
None of us ordinary folk can ever be sure whether Epstein topped himself, or he was murdered. My guess is he was murdered because he had so much sh*t on powerful people, who abused women, that he had to be permanently removed
As for Virginia Roberts.....it wouldnt surprise me to hear shes had an " accident" of some sort .
The powerful ( including the Royal Family) will stop at nothing to preserve the status quo
Re: Prince Andrew
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:16 pm
by Disoriented
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:53 pm
None of us ordinary folk can ever be sure whether Epstein topped himself, or he was murdered. My guess is he was murdered because he had so much sh*t on powerful people, who abused women, that he had to be permanently removed
As for Virginia Roberts.....it wouldnt surprise me to hear shes had an " accident" of some sort .
The powerful ( including the Royal Family) will stop at nothing to preserve the status quo
What are you insinuating here fella?
Re: Prince Andrew
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:34 pm
by StillSpike
I was extremely surprised when Epstein committed suicide.
Not as surprised as he was, mind.
Re: Prince Andrew
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:22 pm
by Article_50
StillSpike wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:34 pm
I was extremely surprised when Epstein committed suicide.
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:53 pm
None of us ordinary folk can ever be sure whether Epstein topped himself, or he was murdered. My guess is he was murdered because he had so much sh*t on powerful people, who abused women, that he had to be permanently removed
As for Virginia Roberts.....it wouldnt surprise me to hear shes had an " accident" of some sort .
The powerful ( including the Royal Family) will stop at nothing to preserve the status quo
What are you insinuating here fella?
Are you serious?
Re: Prince Andrew
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:07 pm
by BIGRON
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:53 pm
None of us ordinary folk can ever be sure whether Epstein topped himself, or he was murdered. My guess is he was murdered because he had so much sh*t on powerful people, who abused women, that he had to be permanently removed
As for Virginia Roberts.....it wouldnt surprise me to hear shes had an " accident" of some sort .
The powerful ( including the Royal Family) will stop at nothing to preserve the status quo
But have the Royals been to Brissie road to hear the Quo ? .....they could have a bloody long wait
Anybody else think that ‘dark forces’ were behind Epstein’s ‘suicide’ ??
Yes, they already are pinning the negligence on two prison guards who would not agree to a plea deal. Under the most corrupt US President and his curupt Attorney General Bill Barr (Who by the way is known as the Cover up General, for real) I believe they are capable of anything.
Epstein had the goods on Trump too and many other powerful people.
When Trump was asked about Epstein, he said we fell out and I haven't spoken to him for 10 or 15 years, his usual, I hardly knew him or never knew him answer.
