Page 5 of 5
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:40 pm
by one o in huntingdon
Disoriented wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:21 pm
Can’t we do some sort of trade? The Yanks could give us this Sacoolas character and we could give them back Ruby Wax.
Prince Andrew might be of interest to them in a swap deal
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:41 pm
by Disoriented
one o in huntingdon wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:40 pm
Disoriented wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:21 pm
Can’t we do some sort of trade? The Yanks could give us this Sacoolas character and we could give them back Ruby Wax.
Prince Andrew might be of interest to them in a swap deal
Both should be in the Tower, fella.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:12 pm
by Disoriented
Now charged by the CPS. Time for Raab to actually do something rather than spouting empty rhetoric.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:52 pm
by Lucky7
Disoriented wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:12 pm
Now charged by the CPS. Time for Raab to actually do something rather than spouting empty rhetoric.
You mean the same Raab who was laughing in Parliament today when someone was having a serious rant about the Yemen
Don’t hold your breathe on that one Dis
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 4:00 am
by Disoriented
Lucky7 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:52 pm
Disoriented wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:12 pm
Now charged by the CPS. Time for Raab to actually do something rather than spouting empty rhetoric.
You mean the same Raab who was laughing in Parliament today when someone was having a serious rant about the Yemen
Don’t hold your breathe on that one Dis
Yep, that same empty-headed intellectual paperweight.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 7:05 pm
by Max B Gold
I think we can all agree that I called this one months ago when I questioned whether she had diplomatic immunity.
She doesn't.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 7:36 pm
by point nine one eight
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 7:05 pm
I think we can all agree that I called this one months ago when I questioned whether she had diplomatic immunity.
She doesn't.
She claimed Diplomatic Immunity here, however now she's in America it doesn't apply, also there is a dispute because she was not a diplomat when she high tailed out of here, just scarpered as soon as she could pack her case, you only scarper that quick when your hiding something.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 8:23 am
by Disoriented
And this is the ‘special relationship’.
Don’t make me laugh. We are America’s b**ch.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 8:57 am
by LittleMate
Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 8:23 am
And this is the ‘special relationship’.
Don’t make me laugh. We are America’s b**ch.
That is the special relationship. They bark an order and we yap in support; we yap an order and they go deaf. Nobody does it quite as well as us - and that's why its special....
This woman needs to come back and face the music. All of this hiding will only make it worse for her. It was never a deliberate act, but she's deliberately hiding from the justice system. Shame on her and on those that either protect her or fail to pursue her.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:42 pm
by Disoriented
LittleMate wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 8:57 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 8:23 am
And this is the ‘special relationship’.
Don’t make me laugh. We are America’s b**ch.
That is the special relationship. They bark an order and we yap in support; we yap an order and they go deaf. Nobody does it quite as well as us - and that's why its special....
This woman needs to come back and face the music. All of this hiding will only make it worse for her. It was never a deliberate act, but she's deliberately hiding from the justice system. Shame on her and on those that either protect her or fail to pursue her.
Quite correct fella on all counts.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:02 pm
by Thor
Surely we will be submitting extradition papers for her? I did read that the USA judge the submission on the chance of success in the courts whereas we judge the submission of the paperwork and don't prejudge the accused.
There defo needs to be a realignment on the criteria for the application of extradition between our two countries.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:04 pm
by Disoriented
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:02 pm
Surely we will be submitting extradition papers for her? I did read that the USA judge the submission on the chance of success in the courts whereas we judge the submission of the paperwork and don't prejudge the accused.
There defo needs to be a realignment on the criteria for the application of extradition between our two countries.
Zero chance of that happening. Our trade deal comes before justice or human rights.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:19 pm
by Thor
Boris has called for it to happen, the lawmakers have to do it. Justice has to happen.
Re: Anne Sacoolas
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:22 pm
by Disoriented
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:19 pm
Boris has called for it to happen, the lawmakers have to do it. Justice has to happen.
The fact that Boris has called for it to happen means it has zero chance of happening. The man is an absolute serial liar.