King Charles III Watch

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Post Reply
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13960
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2437 times
Been thanked: 3184 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Long slender neck »

Still alive then?
E10EU
Fresh Alias
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:12 am
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 165 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by E10EU »

CEB wrote: Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:19 am We can only assume that Kate f***ed the Royal that died, Will shot him and then battered Kate into a coma.

There’s nothing else that makes any sense
I suspect she had cosmetic surgery. After 3 children, maybe she thought a tummy tuck would help with appearing glamorous and to stop Will's eyes from roving.
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4443
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 1911 times
Been thanked: 1591 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Proposition Joe »

Wills has killed her.
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10227
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4428 times
Been thanked: 3116 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

Long slender neck wrote: Sun Mar 10, 2024 1:57 pm Still alive then?
Or not…the intrigue continues…
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... nipulation
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13960
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2437 times
Been thanked: 3184 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Long slender neck »

Probably had a finger transplant after all that pegging.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8635
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1013 times
Been thanked: 2385 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Dunners »

Oh wow. Just when I feared this was going to arrive at at dull outcome.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8635
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1013 times
Been thanked: 2385 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Dunners »

I really don't want to get carried away with this, but isn't it about time for the police to start digging up the patio?
User avatar
The Mindsweep
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:50 pm
Location: Bravos
Has thanked: 165 times
Been thanked: 771 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by The Mindsweep »

First they came for his Mum
Then they came for his Wife
They're still working on his brother
Who's next?
CEB

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by CEB »

It’s all very weird.

Trying to think of a likely dull outcome, as a dull outcome is still most likely.
Maybe there’s a stuffy resistance to the idea that a photo could be released showing her in anything but great health, so the palace mocked something up from a couple of photos, maybe one with Kate, one without?

Though as we’ve seen in recent years, the Royals are excellent at combining malicious contempt with baffling stupidity, so who knows?
CEB

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by CEB »

I mean, if she’s in as good health as she looks there, and things are all good, I’d imagine there’d be a simple solution of “can we just get a two minute video message of you and Wills?” to shut it all down
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4422
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 554 times
Been thanked: 1074 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Hoover Attack »

What is the issue with the photo?
Give it to Jabo
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Give it to Jabo »

People do like gossip and rumour; conspiracy rumour even better. Must admit, I am a shade intrigued.
The sooner Martin Ling sorts it out the better.
Give it to Jabo
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2570
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Give it to Jabo »

according to Mrs GITJ, Kate is having a prolonged sulk..
CEB

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by CEB »

Hoover Attack wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am What is the issue with the photo?

Lots of issues with photo manipulation, most likely due to combining various iterations of the same photo and automatically combining them or badly photoshopping them
User avatar
Constanza
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2056
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:31 pm
Has thanked: 165 times
Been thanked: 744 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Constanza »

Hoover Attack wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am What is the issue with the photo?
The state of the paintwork on those windows. Would have thought the Royals could have afforded masking tape and employ a handyman who knows the concept of cutting in.
I'm just glad I moved and don't pay taxes in UK any more to fund these charlatans.
Yanzi Gravy
Fresh Alias
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 2:55 pm
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Yanzi Gravy »

The Mindsweep wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:24 am First they came for his Mum
Then they came for his Wife
They're still working on his brother
Who's next?
Backstairs Billy and the Equerry with the big Willy.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8635
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1013 times
Been thanked: 2385 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Dunners »

Hoover Attack wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am What is the issue with the photo?
Just after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.

But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.

This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5922
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 1420 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

Comes to something when the chief Lizards don’t even control the mainstream media any more
CEB

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by CEB »

Yes. It’s the initial carelessness of “meh, it’s fine” which could have all manner of innocent explanations, to the sudden circling of the wagons.

As someone who gives not a single f*i* about the royals, it’s very funny seeing the warring factions on social media, with plenty of “LOL as if Harry doesn’t have his hairline photoshopped, and Meghan totes uses filters all the time the ugly bitch”, which seems to miss the point somewhat
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4422
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 554 times
Been thanked: 1074 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Hoover Attack »

Dunners wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:23 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am What is the issue with the photo?
Just after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.

But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.

This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
Lizzie's hooves were airbrushed out of every single photo of her and people are querying whether the Palace use photoshop or not?
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13960
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2437 times
Been thanked: 3184 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Long slender neck »

Never complain, never explain.
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4422
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 554 times
Been thanked: 1074 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Hoover Attack »

Long slender neck wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:53 am Never complain, never explain.
In human form one should always remain.
CEB

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by CEB »

Hoover Attack wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:52 am
Dunners wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:23 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am What is the issue with the photo?
Just after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.

But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.

This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
Lizzie's hooves were airbrushed out of every single photo of her and people are querying whether the Palace use photoshop or not?
Eh? Is this a thing?
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13960
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2437 times
Been thanked: 3184 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Long slender neck »

Why are they all laughing in the photo? Their posh faces make me feel sick.
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4443
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 1911 times
Been thanked: 1591 times

Re: King Charles III Watch

Post by Proposition Joe »

Long slender neck wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 10:11 am Why are they all laughing in the photo?
You'd do whatever you were told when you're being held at gunpoint.
Post Reply