King Charles III Watch
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13960
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2437 times
- Been thanked: 3184 times
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:12 am
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 165 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
I suspect she had cosmetic surgery. After 3 children, maybe she thought a tummy tuck would help with appearing glamorous and to stop Will's eyes from roving.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4443
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 1591 times
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10227
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4428 times
- Been thanked: 3116 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13960
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2437 times
- Been thanked: 3184 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8635
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1013 times
- Been thanked: 2385 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8635
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1013 times
- Been thanked: 2385 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
I really don't want to get carried away with this, but isn't it about time for the police to start digging up the patio?
- The Mindsweep
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:50 pm
- Location: Bravos
- Has thanked: 165 times
- Been thanked: 771 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
First they came for his Mum
Then they came for his Wife
They're still working on his brother
Who's next?
Then they came for his Wife
They're still working on his brother
Who's next?
Re: King Charles III Watch
It’s all very weird.
Trying to think of a likely dull outcome, as a dull outcome is still most likely.
Maybe there’s a stuffy resistance to the idea that a photo could be released showing her in anything but great health, so the palace mocked something up from a couple of photos, maybe one with Kate, one without?
Though as we’ve seen in recent years, the Royals are excellent at combining malicious contempt with baffling stupidity, so who knows?
Trying to think of a likely dull outcome, as a dull outcome is still most likely.
Maybe there’s a stuffy resistance to the idea that a photo could be released showing her in anything but great health, so the palace mocked something up from a couple of photos, maybe one with Kate, one without?
Though as we’ve seen in recent years, the Royals are excellent at combining malicious contempt with baffling stupidity, so who knows?
Re: King Charles III Watch
I mean, if she’s in as good health as she looks there, and things are all good, I’d imagine there’d be a simple solution of “can we just get a two minute video message of you and Wills?” to shut it all down
- Hoover Attack
- Regular
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 554 times
- Been thanked: 1074 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 402 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
People do like gossip and rumour; conspiracy rumour even better. Must admit, I am a shade intrigued.
The sooner Martin Ling sorts it out the better.
The sooner Martin Ling sorts it out the better.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 402 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
Lots of issues with photo manipulation, most likely due to combining various iterations of the same photo and automatically combining them or badly photoshopping them
- Constanza
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2056
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:31 pm
- Has thanked: 165 times
- Been thanked: 744 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
The state of the paintwork on those windows. Would have thought the Royals could have afforded masking tape and employ a handyman who knows the concept of cutting in.
I'm just glad I moved and don't pay taxes in UK any more to fund these charlatans.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 2:55 pm
- Has thanked: 75 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
Backstairs Billy and the Equerry with the big Willy.The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:24 am First they came for his Mum
Then they came for his Wife
They're still working on his brother
Who's next?
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8635
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1013 times
- Been thanked: 2385 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
Just after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.
But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.
This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5922
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 371 times
- Been thanked: 1420 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
Comes to something when the chief Lizards don’t even control the mainstream media any more
Re: King Charles III Watch
Yes. It’s the initial carelessness of “meh, it’s fine” which could have all manner of innocent explanations, to the sudden circling of the wagons.
As someone who gives not a single f*i* about the royals, it’s very funny seeing the warring factions on social media, with plenty of “LOL as if Harry doesn’t have his hairline photoshopped, and Meghan totes uses filters all the time the ugly bitch”, which seems to miss the point somewhat
As someone who gives not a single f*i* about the royals, it’s very funny seeing the warring factions on social media, with plenty of “LOL as if Harry doesn’t have his hairline photoshopped, and Meghan totes uses filters all the time the ugly bitch”, which seems to miss the point somewhat
- Hoover Attack
- Regular
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 554 times
- Been thanked: 1074 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
Lizzie's hooves were airbrushed out of every single photo of her and people are querying whether the Palace use photoshop or not?Dunners wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:23 amJust after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.
But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.
This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13960
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2437 times
- Been thanked: 3184 times
- Hoover Attack
- Regular
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 554 times
- Been thanked: 1074 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
Eh? Is this a thing?Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:52 amLizzie's hooves were airbrushed out of every single photo of her and people are querying whether the Palace use photoshop or not?Dunners wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:23 amJust after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.
But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.
This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13960
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2437 times
- Been thanked: 3184 times
Re: King Charles III Watch
Why are they all laughing in the photo? Their posh faces make me feel sick.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4443
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 1591 times