Is that Lucky then? Not talking about a recent banning.
The actual Government stats on COVID 19
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
He is talking about Mondeoman who got permied a few years ago. Despite that, he was allowed to return under a well established alias.
Life doesn’t mean life obviously.
Life doesn’t mean life obviously.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 662 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
Do you fancy summarising your opinions of all the stats you seem to enjoy reviewing. Genuine interest.Norman_S_ Fletcher wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:18 am From 500,000 projected deaths a week ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51979654
Now down to 5700. After just ONE WEEK of the lockdown.
Penny dropped yet?
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
Don’t encourage him Prez.Redline wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:01 pmDo you fancy summarising your opinions of all the stats you seem to enjoy reviewing. Genuine interest.Norman_S_ Fletcher wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:18 am From 500,000 projected deaths a week ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51979654
Now down to 5700. After just ONE WEEK of the lockdown.
Penny dropped yet?
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 662 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
Why? Believe it or not I take an interest in other people’s views. Even yours, should you have any.Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:29 pmDon’t encourage him Prez.Redline wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:01 pmDo you fancy summarising your opinions of all the stats you seem to enjoy reviewing. Genuine interest.Norman_S_ Fletcher wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:18 am From 500,000 projected deaths a week ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51979654
Now down to 5700. After just ONE WEEK of the lockdown.
Penny dropped yet?
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
Should I have any?Redline wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:33 pmWhy? Believe it or not I take an interest in other people’s views. Even yours, should you have any.
I thought you wanted to be less combative on here?
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2213
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:49 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 421 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
Redline is Prez?Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:29 pmDon’t encourage him Prez.Redline wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:01 pmDo you fancy summarising your opinions of all the stats you seem to enjoy reviewing. Genuine interest.Norman_S_ Fletcher wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:18 am From 500,000 projected deaths a week ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51979654
Now down to 5700. After just ONE WEEK of the lockdown.
Penny dropped yet?
I thought there was a constant stream of these characters, but now I'm finding out it's just the same few being recycled.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:41 pm
- Has thanked: 150 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
The figures have not been accurate up to this point. From tomorrow on, they are supposed to provide more accurate figures.Norman_S_ Fletcher wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:18 am From 500,000 projected deaths a week ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51979654
Now down to 5700. After just ONE WEEK of the lockdown.
Penny dropped yet?
The new measures while late should help reduce the death rate and infection rate in particular. The hard work by so many people on the ground is inspiring. They realised that the system wouldn't have been able to cope. Still have a huge shortage off PPE and Test kits as the UK was one of the countries that were initially slow to act and ended up desperately trying to get the necessary medical supplies worldwide.
Flatten that curve people. Give the health workers and Patients the best fighting chance possible.
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
It is hard to keep up - granted.Real Al wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:52 pmRedline is Prez?
I thought there was a constant stream of these characters, but now I'm finding out it's just the same few being recycled.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2598
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 627 times
Re: The actual Government stats on COVID 19
I think you've misunderstood this mate, there is a reliable test for C-19 it's just the lack of testing the full population means you don't know how prevalent it is.Norman_S_ Fletcher wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 9:09 pm Did you know that there is no known reliable test for Covid 19?
I can find a quote here from Wikipedia:
"Due to limited testing, as of March 2020 no countries had reliable data on the prevalence of the virus in their population.[102] This variability also affects reported case-fatality rates."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_testing
Sorry folks but the B*lls**t is getting stronger all the time about this.
We only test people who have symptoms, so it's likely there is of thousands more who have had it due to 80% not showing symptoms