Negative Formation
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 652 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Negative Formation
I’m sure that I’m not alone in failing to understand why Ross doesn’t play with Angol and Wilkinson up front as a pair.
Angol did his best up front alone, often surrounded by Grimsby defenders being kicked and pushed etc with Wilko around 25-30 yards away out on the wing.
Why ??!
Grimsby were there for the taking IMHO and looked one of the weakest teams we’ve played so far so why play just one up front.
We should be looking to get both Angol and Wilko on the ball as much as possible.
Angol did his best up front alone, often surrounded by Grimsby defenders being kicked and pushed etc with Wilko around 25-30 yards away out on the wing.
Why ??!
Grimsby were there for the taking IMHO and looked one of the weakest teams we’ve played so far so why play just one up front.
We should be looking to get both Angol and Wilko on the ball as much as possible.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Negative Formation
It's because he doesn't have the belief to go out and win a game, we are set up not to lose.Cheshunto wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:00 pm I’m sure that I’m not alone in failing to understand why Ross doesn’t play with Angol and Wilkinson up front as a pair.
Angol did his best up front alone, often surrounded by Grimsby defenders being kicked and pushed etc with Wilko around 25-30 yards away out on the wing.
Why ??!
Grimsby were there for the taking IMHO and looked one of the weakest teams we’ve played so far so why play just one up front.
We should be looking to get both Angol and Wilko on the ball as much as possible.
Today was strange, our best centre half over the last month or so shifted to right back, the player who has played at left back moved to his natural position, our left winger shifted to left back, a centre forward at right wing. Then you have Wright who is absolutely useless again today staying on the whole 90 mins.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:18 am
- Has thanked: 456 times
- Been thanked: 152 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 652 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Re: Negative Formation
I thought Josh did well today, but then Grimsby didn’t have much up front to trouble our back four.
After all, we gifted them their goal.
- ComeOnYouOs
- Regular
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
- Awards: Colossal berk
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Re: Negative Formation
Ross isn't cut out for the job...... We all know it.
We hopefully will scrape to safety by the skin of our noses.
After that... Who knows!
We hopefully will scrape to safety by the skin of our noses.
After that... Who knows!
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 652 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Re: Negative Formation
Yeah we deserved a draw today but almost didn’t get it.
Imagine the sh*t storm Ross would have faced had we not got that equaliser and lost today to one of the poorer teams to visit E10.
I think we will scramble to safety but Ross needs some backing in the transfer market to make sure.
Imagine the sh*t storm Ross would have faced had we not got that equaliser and lost today to one of the poorer teams to visit E10.
I think we will scramble to safety but Ross needs some backing in the transfer market to make sure.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Negative Formation
Agreed I thought he was good today and I'm pleased for him to boot. Hopefully he continues in this way.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Negative Formation
We go through the same thing same time next year.ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:42 pm Ross isn't cut out for the job...... We all know it.
We hopefully will scrape to safety by the skin of our noses.
After that... Who knows!
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Negative Formation
I don't see how we can call that a negative formation
Spoke to some Grimsby fans in C& H after the game & they can't believe where we are.
Spoke to some Grimsby fans in C& H after the game & they can't believe where we are.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 228 times
Re: Negative Formation
It's the same every week though, "play well" do nothing and concede, I still think a proper quality striker in the central role would make a massive difference
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7326
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:32 pm
- Has thanked: 1099 times
- Been thanked: 1343 times
Re: Negative Formation
Not if he is isolated with no supportessexfootball wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:09 pm It's the same every week though, "play well" do nothing and concede, I still think a proper quality striker in the central role would make a massive difference
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 228 times
Re: Negative Formation
A proper central striker would be able to hold it up though and bring others into play or flood in behind them, that's the difference, Palmer earlier in the season tore us as apart when he came on and held the ball up and then got on the end of thingsSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:12 pmNot if he is isolated with no supportessexfootball wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:09 pm It's the same every week though, "play well" do nothing and concede, I still think a proper quality striker in the central role would make a massive difference
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7326
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:32 pm
- Has thanked: 1099 times
- Been thanked: 1343 times
Re: Negative Formation
It's not as simple as that though. When outnumbered and crowded out by the opposition, especially when we're at home, it's going to limit their effectiveness no matter how good they are at holding the ball up. And that assumes we're able to effextively and accurately get the ball to them.essexfootball wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:15 pmA proper central striker would be able to hold it up though and bring others into play or flood in behind them, that's the difference, Palmer earlier in the season tore us as apart when he came on and held the ball up and then got on the end of thingsSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:12 pmNot if he is isolated with no supportessexfootball wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:09 pm It's the same every week though, "play well" do nothing and concede, I still think a proper quality striker in the central role would make a massive difference
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 652 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Re: Negative Formation
I agree that we played reasonably well today but it was a game we could and should have won, but only if Ross had been a little bit braver and played TWO out and out forwards.
We didn’t really pressure their back four enough with just Angol up front.
Just my opinion of course, but others sitting around me thought the same.
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Negative Formation
We haven't got 2 fit out & out strikers that can do 90 minutes at the moment & that is hurting us.Cheshunto wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:26 pmI agree that we played reasonably well today but it was a game we could and should have won, but only if Ross had been a little bit braver and played TWO out and out forwards.
We didn’t really pressure their back four enough with just Angol up front.
Just my opinion of course, but others sitting around me thought the same.
Still soon enough
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7776
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3440 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Negative Formation
Many saying we played well today but for all the "dominating" Grismby the stats still only show 2 attempts on goal, one being the penalty
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50990507
Can't see how we can deserve to win having barely tested the keeper. Better service today, particularly from JMD but no-one in the dangerous areas to finish it off. That's where you get the playing well but still conceding issues coming from individual errors.
Next home game will be interesting with these promised new signings in place.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50990507
Can't see how we can deserve to win having barely tested the keeper. Better service today, particularly from JMD but no-one in the dangerous areas to finish it off. That's where you get the playing well but still conceding issues coming from individual errors.
Next home game will be interesting with these promised new signings in place.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Negative Formation
We have.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:29 pmWe haven't got 2 fit out & out strikers that can do 90 minutes at the moment & that is hurting us.Cheshunto wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:26 pmI agree that we played reasonably well today but it was a game we could and should have won, but only if Ross had been a little bit braver and played TWO out and out forwards.
We didn’t really pressure their back four enough with just Angol up front.
Just my opinion of course, but others sitting around me thought the same.
Still soon enough
Ross just chooses not to play 2 up top, because our midfielders are weak.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:06 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 258 times
Re: Negative Formation
Thor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:25 pmIt's because he doesn't have the belief to go out and win a game, we are set up not to lose.Cheshunto wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:00 pm I’m sure that I’m not alone in failing to understand why Ross doesn’t play with Angol and Wilkinson up front as a pair.
Angol did his best up front alone, often surrounded by Grimsby defenders being kicked and pushed etc with Wilko around 25-30 yards away out on the wing.
Why ??!
Grimsby were there for the taking IMHO and looked one of the weakest teams we’ve played so far so why play just one up front.
We should be looking to get both Angol and Wilko on the ball as much as possible.
Today was strange, our best centre half over the last month or so shifted to right back, the player who has played at left back moved to his natural position, our left winger shifted to left back, a centre forward at right wing. Then you have Wright who is absolutely useless again today staying on the whole 90 mins.
Ross in his interview said that Wilkinson prefers to play on the wing. He was not bought into the club to play in that position we needed to replace Bonne and koroma with a dual striking force . When he does play Wilkinson as striker he moves Angol to the wing. I agree his set up is to not lose very negative tactics at home all season. Brophy at full back is a complete waste.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12593
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 2581 times
Re: Negative Formation
That is what’s so frustrating . We are capable of playing some good football .
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Negative Formation
Let me rephrase thatRedO wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 11:04 pmWe have.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:29 pmWe haven't got 2 fit out & out strikers that can do 90 minutes at the moment & that is hurting us.Cheshunto wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 10:26 pm
I agree that we played reasonably well today but it was a game we could and should have won, but only if Ross had been a little bit braver and played TWO out and out forwards.
We didn’t really pressure their back four enough with just Angol up front.
Just my opinion of course, but others sitting around me thought the same.
Still soon enough
Ross just chooses not to play 2 up top, because our midfielders are weak.
2 out & out strikers who will score inside & outside of the box, 2 good feet & big enough to be a threat in the air
Both banging in 15 goals + a season .
That's the important bit for me
Even Bonne for me isn't an out & out forward.
Great finisher good little striker etc
But you play to His strength rather than playing to a team's strength.
Totally agree about the lightweight midfield.
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Negative Formation
So in your learned opinion Tiff, what is the next step to get us moving up the table?tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 6:47 amLet me rephrase that
2 out & out strikers who will score inside & outside of the box, 2 good feet & big enough to be a threat in the air
Both banging in 15 goals + a season .
That's the important bit for me
Even Bonne for me isn't an out & out forward.
Great finisher good little striker etc
But you play to His strength rather than playing to a team's strength.
Totally agree about the lightweight midfield.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times