We could field 22 players

cockhat · Post by **cockhat** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:25 pm

And still find a way to lose!

Born to run · Post by **Born to run** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:26 pm

Embleton, would still only play one of them, up front

Howling Mad Murdock · Post by **Howling Mad Murdock** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:28 pm

Good god,we are rubbish.

gshaw · Post by **gshaw** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:28 pm

At least 5 would get hamstring injuries in the warmup though

cockhat · Post by **cockhat** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:29 pm

Born to run wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:26 pm Embleton, would still only play one of them, up front

Howling Mad Murdock · Post by **Howling Mad Murdock** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:30 pm

10-10-1

I reckon we'd win.

cockhat · Post by **cockhat** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:32 pm

Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:30 pm 10-10-1

I reckon we'd win.

nah, we’d have trouble finding someone to pass to!

MrB · Post by **MrB** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:35 pm

cockhat wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:32 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:30 pm 10-10-1

I reckon we'd win.
nah, we’d have trouble finding someone to pass to!

and still manage give it to the opposition

MrB · Post by **MrB** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:36 pm

Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:28 pm Good god,we are rubbish.

Hey! We aren’t that good!

Howling Mad Murdock · Post by **Howling Mad Murdock** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm

We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.

Thor · Post by **Thor** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:22 pm

We are a poor side due to the interim head coaches lack of ability to lead the team.

PoundhillO · Post by **PoundhillO** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:32 pm

Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.

Think that was a fluke, having been 3-0 up we managed to cling on after conceding 2 goals, says it all really.

Smendrick Feaselberg · Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:41 pm

PoundhillO wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:32 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.
Think that was a fluke, having been 3-0 up we managed to cling on after conceding 2 goals, says it all really.

Says what? That we beat Cambridge. Ok...

Lovejoy · Post by **Lovejoy** » Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:01 pm

Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.

Cambridge lost 4-0 today which may put that result into perspective.

MrB · Post by **MrB** » Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:03 am

Lovejoy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:01 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.
Cambridge lost 4-0 today which may put that result into perspective.

And once again they were 3 down at half time

banqo · Post by **banqo** » Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:07 am

..... and still not have a midfield!

essexfootball · Post by **essexfootball** » Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:24 am

Beat Cambridge due to set pieces, free kick, free kick goal, pen, there is no goals from open play, the most likely to score from open play looks to be JMD or even Wright, Brophy carries no real goal threat, Angol doesn't seem to be a goal machine, Harrold isn't. Wilkinson is the most natrual goal scorer in the squad

Disoriented · Post by **Disoriented** » Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:00 pm

essexfootball wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:24 am Beat Cambridge due to set pieces, free kick, free kick goal, pen, there is no goals from open play, the most likely to score from open play looks to be JMD or even Wright, Brophy carries no real goal threat, Angol doesn't seem to be a goal machine, Harrold isn't. Wilkinson is the most natrual goal scorer in the squad

All true sadly.

Independent Leyton Orient Forum

We could field 22 players

We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players

Re: We could field 22 players