Ratings v Cambridge

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Fanny
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Fanny »

Sargent - 7. really good in the first half. Let two in but I’m not sure how many were his fault. Needs to learn how to time waste a bit better. Surely number 1 over Brill now.

Turley - 8. Scored a goal. Solid CB. But carded and gave away pen. Like Sargent, surely a first teamer from now on

Marvin- 7. Better than he’s been recently.

Happe - 7. Usual composed self.

Judd - 5. Really ropey. Kicking all over the place. Unlucky to get sent off but still not an improvement on Sam Ling, really.

Marsh - 6 decent shift.

JMD. 7. Belting free kick. Get a 7 for that alone.

Wright - 7. Lucky that the pen save ended up at his feet. Otherwise a decent and solid performance. He gets stick from some on here but he’s a decent CM.

Clay - 6. Usual stuff. Persistent moaning.

Brophy - 5. Didn’t even realise he was on the pitch

Angol - 6. Bashed all over the place and was unlucky at times. This type of game didn’t really suit him. Should have scored when through on goal.

Subs.

Harold -7. I’m basing this score purely on the fact that his job was to hold the ball up and waste time. He did it well.

Kyprianou - 5. Not a criticism but he didn’t do anything, not that he had a chance to.

Coulson - n/a. Nice to see him get a warm welcome brim Cambridge fans. Saw him talking to some Cambridge kids whilst warming up too. Nice guy.

As always, feel free to disagree
Last edited by Fanny on Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8097
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3635 times
Been thanked: 1859 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by gshaw »

Huxley wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:24 pm
Wilkinson - 5. Didn’t even realise he was on the pitch
Because he wasn't... :lol:
Fanny
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Fanny »

gshaw wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:27 pm
Huxley wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:24 pm
Wilkinson - 5. Didn’t even realise he was on the pitch
Because he wasn't... :lol:
LOL! That typo says it all. Thanks for pointing out.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Judd was superb again. A massive improvement on Ling. But he’s let himself down with two silly decisions. The second one wouldn’t have been a yellow if they hadn’t already gone down to 10.

Angol was brilliant again, too. But he can’t be expected to do it all on his own.
Chief crazy horse
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:02 pm
Has thanked: 472 times
Been thanked: 642 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Chief crazy horse »

Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
User avatar
Howling Mad Murdock
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2356
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:55 am
Has thanked: 1781 times
Been thanked: 344 times
Contact:

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Howling Mad Murdock »

Chief crazy horse wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
Differing opinions.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Chief crazy horse wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
I’m right. Bags of energy, aggressive, a really really good first half.

Spoilt it with one of his dive ins - you could see he wasn’t going to win it - then a silly pull back after losing the ball on the edge of their box.

You know he’ll get punished by the club for it, which is a real shame. He needs game time so he can get more experience and learn not to make these mistakes.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
Chief crazy horse
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:02 pm
Has thanked: 472 times
Been thanked: 642 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Chief crazy horse »

Howling Mad Murdock wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:14 pm
Chief crazy horse wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
Differing opinions.
Differing opinions? You can say that again! ☺️
Tom Chance
Fresh Alias
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:17 pm
Has thanked: 314 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Tom Chance »

Chief crazy horse wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:38 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:14 pm
Chief crazy horse wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
Differing opinions.
Differing opinions? ☺️
I thought differing opinions had been outlawed on here.
Fanny
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Fanny »

RedO wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
It tells you that the OP is human and makes typos.

And Judds kicking was all over the place.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Disoriented »

Huxley wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:27 am
RedO wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
It tells you that the OP is human and makes typos.

And Judds kicking was all over the place.
As is your analysis.
Fanny
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Fanny »

Disoriented wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:47 am
Huxley wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:27 am
RedO wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
It tells you that the OP is human and makes typos.

And Judds kicking was all over the place.
As is your analysis.
Maybe so.

It’s just my opinion. People are welcome to challenge it.

Which bits in particular do you not agree with?
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Huxley wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:27 am
RedO wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
It tells you that the OP is human and makes typos.

And Judds kicking was all over the place.
A typo??? 😂
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
Fanny
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Fanny »

:lol:
RedO wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
:lol:

Maybe that’s why he kept booting it into the stands. He was trying to pick out Wilko!

By the way, having seen the incident close up in the highlights his sending off was ludicrous. The club have to appeal that, if they can.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Huxley wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:13 am :lol:
RedO wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
:lol:

Maybe that’s why he kept booting it into the stands. He was trying to pick out Wilko!
😀

Can’t appeal a yellow, unfortunately.
Fanny
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Fanny »

RedO wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:14 am
Huxley wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:13 am :lol:
RedO wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
:lol:

Maybe that’s why he kept booting it into the stands. He was trying to pick out Wilko!
😀

Can’t appeal a yellow, unfortunately.
Even if it leads to a red?

That’s a silly rule.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Aye but that’s how it is.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8097
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3635 times
Been thanked: 1859 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by gshaw »

Huxley wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:13 am :lol:
RedO wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
:lol:

Maybe that’s why he kept booting it into the stands. He was trying to pick out Wilko!

By the way, having seen the incident close up in the highlights his sending off was ludicrous. The club have to appeal that, if they can.
I'm not actually surprised he got booked for that second one. Yes it's a pretty lame way to get sent off but he does rather cynically foul the guy to stop a breakaway, usually you take a booking on the chin for that. The fact he did it when already on a yellow not the brightest idea.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Not on the edge of the oppositions penalty box, you don't.

Still a silly decision. But then he's a kid who has had his game time restricted needlessly, so its not surprising.
RealLoughtonO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by RealLoughtonO »

Sounds like a reasonable game, watched the highlights, shame I missed it, went to Albion Rovers v Annan instead, good win for Rovers.
Red_Army
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 6:57 pm
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 210 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by Red_Army »

Judd was very poor again I'm afraid. His one asset, his aggression, is his biggest weakness as of he gets beatej to the punch, he's in big trouble.

His sending off was the result of stupidly trying to take on their defenders when he could have played a simple ball back inside.
essexfootball
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:24 am
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by essexfootball »

Sargent - 9 - couple of good saves second half

Turley - 7. Good movement for the goal, gave away the pen, apart from that defence looks far more solid with him

Marvin- 7. Looks far more at home with Turley

Happe - 7. Solid reliable, also covers across well when one of the CB's gets caught

Judd - 6. Said last week he plays like he has had too many lucozades and gets caught being too eager, i think his energy going forward is a lot better than Ling's though, he actually wants to go forward, strech the pitch, try crosses

Marsh - 6 - solid enough, stupid booking

JMD. 8 - Honestly don't get how he doesn't start every game, only player in the squad who can do certain things, free kick for the first goal, brillant goal from the other free kick and went close as well when cutting in at one point, he needs to be on the pitch for his quality of crosses and he can pinch the odd goal

Wright - 7. Solid performance

Clay - 6. Same as Wright really, solid

Brophy - 6 - Thought he stretched the pitch well and his pace kept the defender back,

Angol - 6.5 - Worked hard up front, had a great chance to score, just needs to show a bit more of a goal instinct, few chances last few games you would expect a striker to steal a goal

Subs.

Harold -7. Came on held the ball up

Kyprianou - 5. Played a delightful ball to Cray

Coulson - n/a. Came on as defensive reenforcment
BIGRON
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10299
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:59 pm
Has thanked: 247 times
Been thanked: 926 times

Re: Ratings v Cambridge

Post by BIGRON »

I would duck Judd a couple of points for getting sent off , totally unnecessary and unprofessional.
Post Reply