Fellowo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2019 8:13 am
No surprise as the exact words weren't mentioned in the referees report, so we can only assume that whilst the fact the referee booked Cooper and sent off Ross the 4th official saw words being said, he wasn't concentrating enough to recall what it was.
Cooper could have been booked for his reaction to what ross did. We don't know what Cooper was booked for.
You are jumping to conclusions about the reason for Cooper's booking. Indeed if the 4th official didn't hear what Cooper said, he couldn't have been booked for the words he used
As Martin Ling says on the Podcast, Cooper has to sleep at night knowing what he said and the fact that he hasn't come out and apologised speaks volumes about the man. What is worse though is Forest Green have condoned his actions and made it look that Ross, for no reason whatsoever decided to throw his gum at Cooper.
I was going to respond with an explanation, but such as people like yourself on here, I really can't be bothered with your argumentative twaddle.
Sorry for having an opinion and for being able to point out the flaw in your argument
if officials didn't hear what Cooper said, then he can't have been booked for what he said
spen666 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2019 9:45 am
Cooper could have been booked for his reaction to what ross did. We don't know what Cooper was booked for.
You are jumping to conclusions about the reason for Cooper's booking. Indeed if the 4th official didn't hear what Cooper said, he couldn't have been booked for the words he used
I was going to respond with an explanation, but such as people like yourself on here, I really can't be bothered with your argumentative twaddle.
Sorry for having an opinion and for being able to point out the flaw in your argument
if officials didn't hear what Cooper said, then he can't have been booked for what he said
Ergo your argument falls flat on its face
It's the fact you and others that go out your way to look in flaws in people's comments that has become tiresome and frankly have deterred many from bothering to post on here.
And to finish, your own judgement is flawed as you missed an important word in my post that prohibits my comment from being factual and is just an assumption. I'll leave this with you to work out what that word is.
....
And to finish, your own judgement is flawed as you missed an important word in my post that prohibits my comment from being factual and is just an assumption. I'll leave this with you to work out what that word is.
Nice of you to confirm your post isn't factual
PS if the officials never heard Cooper say those words, how could he be booked for them?
You cant be booked for words if not heard by the officials
....
And to finish, your own judgement is flawed as you missed an important word in my post that prohibits my comment from being factual and is just an assumption. I'll leave this with you to work out what that word is.
Nice of you to confirm your post isn't factual
PS if the officials never heard Cooper say those words, how could he be booked for them?
You cant be booked for words if not heard by the officials
My guess is that Cooper was booked for “aggressive behaviour “ or something like that, not for what he allegedly said.
I wonder if the 4th official DID hear something but decided to ‘ cock a deaf’un ‘ not wanting to get involved etc
We’ll never know of course, but it’s possible.
