Johnson v Corbyn
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
I thought Corbyn debated well, not much to choose between them as the poll I posted suggests. A main issue for me was Corbyn refusing to say how he would campaign in the event he had to negotiate a new deal with the eu should he win the election. I do believe it’s important to know where he stands and what he believes in. I know what Boris wants, I know what Jo wants, I have no idea what Jeremy wants. That’s a poor show from him to hide behind whatever, it’s sneaky and snidey in my opinion.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
Of course Jezza won the debate. All the polling I’m seeing indicates exactly that too.
It seems that those saying Boris won are the core 35% or so who vote Tory whatever. The figures for Jezza are including non-Labour voters, which is the crucial difference.
It seems that those saying Boris won are the core 35% or so who vote Tory whatever. The figures for Jezza are including non-Labour voters, which is the crucial difference.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8984
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1066 times
- Been thanked: 2490 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
It doesn't matter who 'won' the debate. What matters is what the few swing voters in key constituencies think. And do you think they are more likely to be represented by:
A - 1,600 45+ boomers who answer the house phone to YouGov, or;
B - 29,665 millennials on Twitter?
I reckon the YouGov poll is more relevant in that context. But Corbyn still did very well considering their polling techniques. Hence why I reckon he can feel most pleased this morning.
A - 1,600 45+ boomers who answer the house phone to YouGov, or;
B - 29,665 millennials on Twitter?
I reckon the YouGov poll is more relevant in that context. But Corbyn still did very well considering their polling techniques. Hence why I reckon he can feel most pleased this morning.
- StillSpike
- Regular
- Posts: 4167
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
- Has thanked: 515 times
- Been thanked: 1198 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
I'll just post this bit again, as you may have missed it:Thor wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:12 am I thought Corbyn debated well, not much to choose between them as the poll I posted suggests. A main issue for me was Corbyn refusing to say how he would campaign in the event he had to negotiate a new deal with the eu should he win the election. I do believe it’s important to know where he stands and what he believes in. I know what Boris wants, I know what Jo wants, I have no idea what Jeremy wants. That’s a poor show from him to hide behind whatever, it’s sneaky and snidey in my opinion.
Why is his position so hard for you to understand? JO just wants to ignore half the country without even letting them have a say. So does Johnson, just it's the other half, and his plan includes tanking the economy and breaking up the Union.Obviously, the Tories would like him to make a stand NOW, one way or another, on which way he'd campaign in his own referendum, because they know that would alienate around half the country, so he's fairly sensible to refuse to make that point now. It's also not an unreasonable position from him that it would be absurd to state in advance whether or not he'd campaign for a deal that's yet to be negotiated. He may well know what his opening position in any negotiations would be, and I suppose if the negotiations ended with him getting everything he wanted at the start, then he'd back the exit deal that resulted. If, on the other hand, the negotiations ended up with a "deal" that he felt was so far short of his ideal (start position) and was so bad for the UK that he'd put it to the people - as promised - but campaign against it.
Now I can't claim to know exactly how I would vote in a potential new referendum of any possible new deal that Corbyn might be able to get Vs Remain, because I haven't seen Corbyn's deal yet (and neither has he, as it hasn't been through negotiation yet). My inclination is that I'd probably vote Remain, but if his deal was good for the UK then I might support it, if I thought we'd be better off under it, and it brought the country together again.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
- StillSpike
- Regular
- Posts: 4167
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
- Has thanked: 515 times
- Been thanked: 1198 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
I don't really do "faith".
But I do hope you're right. A deal to leave that could get a sizeable majority, would be way preferable to a narrow remain win, regardless of my own preference for remain.
But I do hope you're right. A deal to leave that could get a sizeable majority, would be way preferable to a narrow remain win, regardless of my own preference for remain.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
Thanks for reposting although I did read it beforehand. However, it is important what he believes in as it will have an effect on what happens in our country should he win so it is entirely reasonable to want an answer to the question.StillSpike wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 8:20 amI'll just post this bit again, as you may have missed it:Thor wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:12 am I thought Corbyn debated well, not much to choose between them as the poll I posted suggests. A main issue for me was Corbyn refusing to say how he would campaign in the event he had to negotiate a new deal with the eu should he win the election. I do believe it’s important to know where he stands and what he believes in. I know what Boris wants, I know what Jo wants, I have no idea what Jeremy wants. That’s a poor show from him to hide behind whatever, it’s sneaky and snidey in my opinion.
Why is his position so hard for you to understand? JO just wants to ignore half the country without even letting them have a say. So does Johnson, just it's the other half, and his plan includes tanking the economy and breaking up the Union.Obviously, the Tories would like him to make a stand NOW, one way or another, on which way he'd campaign in his own referendum, because they know that would alienate around half the country, so he's fairly sensible to refuse to make that point now. It's also not an unreasonable position from him that it would be absurd to state in advance whether or not he'd campaign for a deal that's yet to be negotiated. He may well know what his opening position in any negotiations would be, and I suppose if the negotiations ended with him getting everything he wanted at the start, then he'd back the exit deal that resulted. If, on the other hand, the negotiations ended up with a "deal" that he felt was so far short of his ideal (start position) and was so bad for the UK that he'd put it to the people - as promised - but campaign against it.
Now I can't claim to know exactly how I would vote in a potential new referendum of any possible new deal that Corbyn might be able to get Vs Remain, because I haven't seen Corbyn's deal yet (and neither has he, as it hasn't been through negotiation yet). My inclination is that I'd probably vote Remain, but if his deal was good for the UK then I might support it, if I thought we'd be better off under it, and it brought the country together again.
As I see it, hes a brexiteer and always has been. His party is majority remain as are his backers momentum, so theres a big split there already. I'm not sure he is strong enough to push through his beliefs in the face of the other factions within the party infrastructure. So again it's entirely reasonable to want an answer to his position should he win power as it will have a bearing on what people will vote.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14291
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2502 times
- Been thanked: 3292 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
Is that the same Boris who wrote newspaper articles in favour of remain AND leave?Thor wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:12 am I thought Corbyn debated well, not much to choose between them as the poll I posted suggests. A main issue for me was Corbyn refusing to say how he would campaign in the event he had to negotiate a new deal with the eu should he win the election. I do believe it’s important to know where he stands and what he believes in. I know what Boris wants, I know what Jo wants, I have no idea what Jeremy wants. That’s a poor show from him to hide behind whatever, it’s sneaky and snidey in my opinion.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
No he won't, that's a bare faced lie. The people have already spoken, hes just ignoring that now.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
I'm aware of what he's said in the past, he now has a deal ready to go, I know he wants to leave. What does jezza want?Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:50 amIs that the same Boris who wrote newspaper articles in favour of remain AND leave?Thor wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:12 am I thought Corbyn debated well, not much to choose between them as the poll I posted suggests. A main issue for me was Corbyn refusing to say how he would campaign in the event he had to negotiate a new deal with the eu should he win the election. I do believe it’s important to know where he stands and what he believes in. I know what Boris wants, I know what Jo wants, I have no idea what Jeremy wants. That’s a poor show from him to hide behind whatever, it’s sneaky and snidey in my opinion.
If the deal is any good is another matter.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14291
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2502 times
- Been thanked: 3292 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
He doesnt want Johnsons deal. He wants to negotiate his own deal and then let the public decide if they like it. Cant be much clearer than that.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
That's not the point and you know it.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:00 am He doesnt want Johnsons deal. He wants to negotiate his own deal and then let the public decide if they like it. Cant be much clearer than that.
Emily thornberry who would be the chief in re-negoiating said on tv that she would do a new deal then woukd vote against it. You cant make this crap up. At least I know what she wants.
So what does jezza want? Will he campaign to remain or leave? Personally I think this one point damages him massively especially amongst labour leave supporters.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14291
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2502 times
- Been thanked: 3292 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
How can he know how he'd vote if the deal hasnt been negotiated yet? It isnt always possible to give definitive answers, things are rarely so simple.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 390 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
Common sense !Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:06 am How can he know how he'd vote if the deal hasnt been negotiated yet? It isnt always possible to give definitive answers, things are rarely so simple.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14291
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2502 times
- Been thanked: 3292 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 1:27 pm
- Has thanked: 1635 times
- Been thanked: 297 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
I 'liked' the way Corbyn pronounced the name Epshtein. Yes, he was a horrible JEWISH groomer/paedo/rapist!
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14291
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2502 times
- Been thanked: 3292 times
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:18 pm
- Has thanked: 48 times
- Been thanked: 186 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
Labour diehards on here trying to put the cart before the horse. How on earth can you have someone negotiating brexit who doesn’t know whether he wants to remain or leave. Absolute nonsense.
You also have an imbecile saying that there is nothing wrong with supporting the murderous I.r.a
No wonder a once proud Labour Party is now so discredited, if these are the sort of supporters it attracts.
You also have an imbecile saying that there is nothing wrong with supporting the murderous I.r.a
No wonder a once proud Labour Party is now so discredited, if these are the sort of supporters it attracts.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 1:27 pm
- Has thanked: 1635 times
- Been thanked: 297 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
If you dont listen to the news ever, then I realise you wouldnt know. There are lots of semi-famous 'stein' people and none are pronounced as 'schtein'
- F*ck The Poor & Fat
- Regular
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 380 times
Re: Johnson v Corbyn
Like honour the last Brexit referendum, a good place to start. That’s what the people voted for.