What deep issues do we have that are Lings fault then?Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:01 pm Think most decent managers would look at us as a basket case that they need to steer clear of. I've been a defender of Ling but the farce with Fletcher doesn't happen at well run clubs. Suspect we've got some deep issues that Ling won't address as to admit them would be to admit fault, hence why he seems to be prodding Ross to go for the managers job permanently.
Martin Ling on the Q & A
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14334
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2515 times
- Been thanked: 3307 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Neither did the premier league nor the champions league but they all still keep the history of continuity. The fact it changed names means nothing.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:03 pmThe Championship didnt even exist then. How old are you?
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4444
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 895 times
- Been thanked: 963 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Do you really think there’s a list of people out there whose dream it is to manage Leyton Orient? Whatever the reason is, if the manager of this club does well, he’ll be targeted by L1 teams and he will go.RedO wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:30 pmAbsolutely not wibble.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:11 amAbsolute wibble. Any manager that does well with Orient will get poached by a club at a higher level. Orient have just sold Bonne and Koroma for peanuts, I'm not sure they're bothered.
It's not about a manager doing well and possibly being poached if they do well. It's about someone not wanting to be here but doing so for a pay day, then clearing off the next time there's a sacking at a club they deem more suitable to their level.
It's totally different with players anyway - a manager is far more instrumental - but Bonne and Koroma both developed themselves whilst here to earn the chance at Championship clubs. They weren't already Championship players operating at a level they considered beneath them.
Is it more instrumental? The way it’s looking is they want the coaches to maintain the status quo and Martin Ling to control everything. The manager is a yes man under this regime. My point about those players was the cheap fees they went for because you guessed it, they didn’t want to be here long term and if a bigger team came in for them, they wanted guarantees they could go.
Orient have to operate in this constant buying and selling market.
- slacker
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:39 am
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 346 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
There’s an interesting thread on twitter about the DoF role (not necessarily confined to whether Ling is the right person).
Our old mate Enormous Derek/Eddie Von Sphincter chips in with a view close to my own. Worth a read through.
Our old mate Enormous Derek/Eddie Von Sphincter chips in with a view close to my own. Worth a read through.
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
We will have a DoF at Leyton Orient whike T&T
have the purse strings .
Might as well be lingy as opposed to someone who caeea not a jot for the Club .
have the purse strings .
Might as well be lingy as opposed to someone who caeea not a jot for the Club .
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
What a strange reply i received
from a very strange poster
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Be original.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:33 pmWhat a strange reply i received
from a very strange poster
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Ah but i am dazOrganised .Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:43 pmBe original.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7705
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3395 times
- Been thanked: 1752 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
One staff member doing both roles? Plenty clubs get on fine without the DoF role. Bearing in mind you've got Macklin there as CEO too if there's the argument about needing someone at the club to oversee business side in the absence of the owners. We could do with Travis being around day-to-day for a while, that would settle things down pretty quickly with his leadership I reckon.
At the beginning Ling was crucial to getting the club back to normal again, no argument about that. Once it was stabilised though the role seems to be a nice-to-have rather than must-have and also appears to limit the field of candidates wanting to work within that structure.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 391 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
I have to agree, initially a DOF was needed when the new owners took over.gshaw wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:13 amOne staff member doing both roles? Plenty clubs get on fine without the DoF role. Bearing in mind you've got Macklin there as CEO too if there's the argument about needing someone at the club to oversee business side in the absence of the owners. We could do with Travis being around day-to-day for a while, that would settle things down pretty quickly with his leadership I reckon.
At the beginning Ling was crucial to getting the club back to normal again, no argument about that. Once it was stabilised though the role seems to be a nice-to-have rather than must-have and also appears to limit the field of candidates wanting to work within that structure.
However I do not believe that is still the case as has been said we have Danny Macklin as CEO.
The money Martin Ling is being paid would be much better spent where is obviously needed by bringing in a proven,experienced Manager at this Level with no interference.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Can you imagine the calibre of manager we could attract if we were offering the combined DOF and head coach packages?
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Still wouldn't happen though would it? They would offer a competitive package, but much less than the combined thus bringing about savings to the wage bill.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1227
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:06 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
We are going to struggle to get an experienced manager . Believe we cannot afford a League 1 manager. Rumour has it that CF was given a contract that either side could terminate within a 3month period. How true this was is anybody’s guess. Don’t know if many managers would agree to these terms if that was the case.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5598 times
- Been thanked: 1071 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Interesting if true and would have saved a lot of money.moonwalk19 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 3:15 pm We are going to struggle to get an experienced manager . Believe we cannot afford a League 1 manager. Rumour has it that CF was given a contract that either side could terminate within a 3month period. How true this was is anybody’s guess. Don’t know if many managers would agree to these terms if that was the case.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5598 times
- Been thanked: 1071 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Agree with both of these comments. ML did a good job in a short time of getting in players so we could field a team. Now time to consider if the DOF role in its current form is needed anymore.PoundhillO wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:39 pmI have to agree, initially a DOF was needed when the new owners took over.gshaw wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:13 amOne staff member doing both roles? Plenty clubs get on fine without the DoF role. Bearing in mind you've got Macklin there as CEO too if there's the argument about needing someone at the club to oversee business side in the absence of the owners. We could do with Travis being around day-to-day for a while, that would settle things down pretty quickly with his leadership I reckon.
At the beginning Ling was crucial to getting the club back to normal again, no argument about that. Once it was stabilised though the role seems to be a nice-to-have rather than must-have and also appears to limit the field of candidates wanting to work within that structure.
However I do not believe that is still the case as has been said we have Danny Macklin as CEO.
The money Martin Ling is being paid would be much better spent where is obviously needed by bringing in a proven,experienced Manager at this Level with no interference.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 323 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
I am sure that although the fundamentals of the DoF role are broadly the same across the board, there will be considerable variations on the theme on a club by club basis. I would agree Sid, that the owners should consider looking at the way in the which the DoF role is structured at the O’s and/ or look at the person who is currently performing that role and then assess If the current set up remains fit for purpose.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
They’ve recently extended his contract so presumably already done that.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 323 times
Re: Martin Ling on the Q & A
Yes I realise he has 18 months or so to go on the new deal. I still think that .given recent events, a review would be in order.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 323 times