Ross part 2

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Post Reply
BiggsyMalone
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4549
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 929 times
Been thanked: 985 times

Ross part 2

Post by BiggsyMalone »



1:30 onwards is strange. It's almost as if he's forgotten about playing 5 at the back, playing sh*t football and everyone being pissed off.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by Thor »

Interestingly he said we will get back to what we were doing previously, that says alot to me about the behind the scenes stuff.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8092
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3631 times
Been thanked: 1859 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by gshaw »

"Some players have needed to have a look at themselves..." hmmm that speaks volumes.
User avatar
F*ck The Poor & Fat
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3101
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 380 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by F*ck The Poor & Fat »

More important, we have a guy worth listening to. With something to say. Refreshing.

Well done Ross.
User avatar
Bergen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4299
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 376 times
Been thanked: 869 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by Bergen »

Top man. He deserves a lot of credit.
User avatar
F*ck The Poor & Fat
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3101
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 380 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by F*ck The Poor & Fat »

gshaw wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:32 pm "Some players have needed to have a look at themselves..." hmmm that speaks volumes.
A statement that applies to anybody whose boss has got the sack. Only the players will know if they gave 100% and if not, why not. Players too are human beings.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8092
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3631 times
Been thanked: 1859 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by gshaw »

UpminsterO wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:29 pm I am full of admiration of Ross E
I appreciate his ability to communicate
I believe he is a very decent and sincere person

What I am thinking is now in the age of social media it appears on this forum that the way some one acts in body language / verbal delivery
Crowd intereaction is more important, or as important as results

If we do get a new person that has achieved before what happens if that person is not very good as a media communicator or has any annoying habit like scratching his face or looking away -do we then have a barrage of posts to get rid if him or will people just accept we are winning and they don't care.

It's getting quite tricky now in life having attributes that satisfies everyone and thus is getting worse each new decade
If you're winning the media stuff wouldn't matter.
User avatar
F*ck The Poor & Fat
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3101
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 380 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by F*ck The Poor & Fat »

UpminsterO wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:29 pm I am full of admiration of Ross E
I appreciate his ability to communicate
I believe he is a very decent and sincere person

What I am thinking is now in the age of social media it appears on this forum that the way some one acts in body language / verbal delivery
Crowd intereaction is more important, or as important as results

If we do get a new person that has achieved before what happens if that person is not very good as a media communicator or has any annoying habit like scratching his face or looking away -do we then have a barrage of posts to get rid if him or will people just accept we are winning and they don't care.

It's getting quite tricky now in life having attributes that satisfies everyone and thus is getting worse each new decade
I dare say if all is well behind the scenes and the team look like they are trying, maybe the odd win, the quality of the interviews will be less of an issue.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by Thor »

He was not fired cos of his I interviews!!!
User avatar
F*ck The Poor & Fat
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3101
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 380 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by F*ck The Poor & Fat »

UpminsterO wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:49 pm We had a manager of a premier club employment culture and ex player captain of country and top clubs - deemed to have the wrong ethos - what was wrong ?- other than results

Did he have a training or tactical presentation so different

I would of thought with the standardised coaching badges a weekly match training cannot be to much different between staff
I doubt the issue was his qualifications, that is the easy bit to assess. It’s how he interacts with colleagues. How he responds to them and they to him. If that ain’t right all the qualifications in the world don’t help.
Eat The Rich
Fresh Alias
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 11:25 am
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by Eat The Rich »

I was deeply critical of Ross in his previous spell but fairs fair he comes across extremely well in that interview and talked a lot of sense. I'd like nothing better than Ross, Webby & Jobi making a rip-roaring success of it. What has come across loud and clear from Ling, Kent and now Ross' versions of events is that Fletch's performance in interviews wasn't a million miles away from his performance with the staff and players. Underwhelming, uninspiring and unconvincing.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13063
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 2655 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Bergen wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:19 pm Top man. He deserves a lot of credit.
Absolutely this .
BiggsyMalone
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4549
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 929 times
Been thanked: 985 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by BiggsyMalone »

UpminsterO wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:49 pm We had a manager of a premier club employment culture and ex player captain of country and top clubs - deemed to have the wrong ethos - what was wrong ?- other than results

Did he have a training or tactical presentation so different

I would of thought with the standardised coaching badges a weekly match training cannot be to much different between staff
This is what is bizarre. They have no issue with his coaching, so what was it? Has he come in all guns blazing?
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Ross part 2

Post by Disoriented »

UpminsterO wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:29 pm I am full of admiration of Ross E
I appreciate his ability to communicate
I believe he is a very decent and sincere person

What I am thinking is now in the age of social media it appears on this forum that the way some one acts in body language / verbal delivery
Crowd intereaction is more important, or as important as results

If we do get a new person that has achieved before what happens if that person is not very good as a media communicator or has any annoying habit like scratching his face or looking away -do we then have a barrage of posts to get rid if him or will people just accept we are winning and they don't care.

It's getting quite tricky now in life having personal attributes that satisfies everyone and thus is getting worse each new decade - the same thing is happening in our workplaces with staff interaction and wanting some one out even if their work is acceptable
Eh?
User avatar
Howling Mad Murdock
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2356
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:55 am
Has thanked: 1781 times
Been thanked: 344 times
Contact:

Re: Ross part 2

Post by Howling Mad Murdock »

Disoriented wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:58 pm Eh?
The Disoriented seal of approval.
Post Reply