Can anyone define this unique culture we're meant to have? Sounds more like coach and player power dressed up in a nice wrapping paper
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e176a/e176ababbc1961e8e693cbef7171c93eccfde586" alt="huh :?"
Moderator: Long slender neck
Essentially. Good coach - but not management material; which looked obvious from the first interview.
That’s not a fair thing to say.
So what is this culture of ours, then?dOh Nut wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:19 pmThat’s not a fair thing to say.
Travis talks about culture and I make him spot on. The type of club we have become is nice to see. Respect, trust, desire to grow, fairness. All good things. But the aspect he was talking about was engaging with his team mates, players, fans (we all talked about this). You need to gel, fit in, be able to chat to people. Being comfortable if you like. The club culture just didn’t fit his personal style. Not saying we are better or worse, just different. Square peg in a round hole.
Travis, Like Ling, has not hidden away but has taken full responsibility for the mistake. We genuinely have a Board to be proud of.
The best way is to google business cultures, you are likely to get a list of, maybe 10, things that contribute to a culture. One being engagement. Or to me, how people work together, interact, get on. This aspect varies vastly in my experience and is one of the cornerstones of the business. Compare Bechetti and Teague. The cultures they inspired could not be further apart.RedO wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:25 pmSo what is this culture of ours, then?dOh Nut wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:19 pmThat’s not a fair thing to say.
Travis talks about culture and I make him spot on. The type of club we have become is nice to see. Respect, trust, desire to grow, fairness. All good things. But the aspect he was talking about was engaging with his team mates, players, fans (we all talked about this). You need to gel, fit in, be able to chat to people. Being comfortable if you like. The club culture just didn’t fit his personal style. Not saying we are better or worse, just different. Square peg in a round hole.
Travis, Like Ling, has not hidden away but has taken full responsibility for the mistake. We genuinely have a Board to be proud of.
Spot on. I have recruited loads of people to management positions over the years and some who looked good at interview, turned out just to be wrong for the service. You have to hold your hands up when that happens. The fact that there is clearly a collective responsibility taken at senior level in the club speaks volumes for a what positive organisation the O's are.dOh Nut wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:39 pmThe best way is to google business cultures, you are likely to get a list of, maybe 10, things that contribute to a culture. One being engagement. Or to me, how people work together, interact, get on. This aspect varies vastly in my experience and is one of the cornerstones of the business. Compare Bechetti and Teague. The cultures they inspired could not be further apart.RedO wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:25 pmSo what is this culture of ours, then?dOh Nut wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:19 pm
That’s not a fair thing to say.
Travis talks about culture and I make him spot on. The type of club we have become is nice to see. Respect, trust, desire to grow, fairness. All good things. But the aspect he was talking about was engaging with his team mates, players, fans (we all talked about this). You need to gel, fit in, be able to chat to people. Being comfortable if you like. The club culture just didn’t fit his personal style. Not saying we are better or worse, just different. Square peg in a round hole.
Travis, Like Ling, has not hidden away but has taken full responsibility for the mistake. We genuinely have a Board to be proud of.
I’m sure Travis in embarrassed. When I interviewed people their technical qualifications were only part of the process, I had to be comfortable that they could fit in. Not always as easy as it sounds. Getting it wrong happens.
The club have just sacked the guy. He will be feeling like sh*t. Why stick the knife in deeper and give it a twist. Travis is displaying a little of the culture he talks about. Respect for his feelings.
I think your interpretation is probably on the money. The whole episode does leave me with an uneasy feeling however that there is a bit of a “ closed shop” mentality within the coaching set up and playing staff, eyeing up “ outsiders” suspiciously and not doing very much at all to help them bed in which is aided and abetted by NT’s take on the “ unique” culture of the club?Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:36 pm I'm going to do my best to play interpreter and say that Justin was a great communicator, an open and supportive man as well as boss, someone who brought the best out of people by talking to them, finding out about them, taking an interest in them. We tried to replace Justin with an introvert who didn't know anyone here. Fletcher wanted to maybe focus more on the football side and treat the staff as personnel (not necessarily in a belittling way) and it just flattened everyone a bit. It also explains why a change was completely necessary. Because the problem was so identifiable and so obviously not fixable.
A positive culture is not a closed shop. I’d go so far as to say it’s quite the opposite.redintheface wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:45 pmI think your interpretation is probably on the money. The whole episode does leave me with an uneasy feeling however that there is a bit of a “ closed shop” mentality within the coaching set up and playing staff, eyeing up “ outsiders” suspiciously and not doing very much at all to help them bed in which is aided and abetted by NT’s take on the “ unique” culture of the club?Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:36 pm I'm going to do my best to play interpreter and say that Justin was a great communicator, an open and supportive man as well as boss, someone who brought the best out of people by talking to them, finding out about them, taking an interest in them. We tried to replace Justin with an introvert who didn't know anyone here. Fletcher wanted to maybe focus more on the football side and treat the staff as personnel (not necessarily in a belittling way) and it just flattened everyone a bit. It also explains why a change was completely necessary. Because the problem was so identifiable and so obviously not fixable.
I agree with you. It’s just that I don’t see anything particularly positive about the way it is rumoured that some coaching staff and players appear to acted in this instance and I wonder if the emphasis NT placed in his interview on the “ unique culture” might in some way be being interpreted in some quarters as “they have to fit into our set up because we ain’t going to adapt to theirs” sort of thing? Probably just over thinking it tbhdOh Nut wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:49 pmA positive culture is not a closed shop. I’d go so far as to say it’s quite the opposite.redintheface wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:45 pmI think your interpretation is probably on the money. The whole episode does leave me with an uneasy feeling however that there is a bit of a “ closed shop” mentality within the coaching set up and playing staff, eyeing up “ outsiders” suspiciously and not doing very much at all to help them bed in which is aided and abetted by NT’s take on the “ unique” culture of the club?Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:36 pm I'm going to do my best to play interpreter and say that Justin was a great communicator, an open and supportive man as well as boss, someone who brought the best out of people by talking to them, finding out about them, taking an interest in them. We tried to replace Justin with an introvert who didn't know anyone here. Fletcher wanted to maybe focus more on the football side and treat the staff as personnel (not necessarily in a belittling way) and it just flattened everyone a bit. It also explains why a change was completely necessary. Because the problem was so identifiable and so obviously not fixable.
I agree and I think this is of potential concern. If the players and staff are not able to work with an outsider, then that is their fault as well. Unfortunately for Fletcher it is a lot easier to get rid of one man, than 25+.redintheface wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:45 pmI think your interpretation is probably on the money. The whole episode does leave me with an uneasy feeling however that there is a bit of a “ closed shop” mentality within the coaching set up and playing staff, eyeing up “ outsiders” suspiciously and not doing very much at all to help them bed in which is aided and abetted by NT’s take on the “ unique” culture of the club?Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:36 pm I'm going to do my best to play interpreter and say that Justin was a great communicator, an open and supportive man as well as boss, someone who brought the best out of people by talking to them, finding out about them, taking an interest in them. We tried to replace Justin with an introvert who didn't know anyone here. Fletcher wanted to maybe focus more on the football side and treat the staff as personnel (not necessarily in a belittling way) and it just flattened everyone a bit. It also explains why a change was completely necessary. Because the problem was so identifiable and so obviously not fixable.
I'm sure he's walking away with a bag of cash and it was a joint decision so I doubt he's feeling sh*t.
To state that we are a unique culture assumes that there is a mass culture and suggests elitism. There isnt. It's a mythredintheface wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:10 pmI agree with you. It’s just that I don’t see anything particularly positive about the way it is rumoured that some coaching staff and players appear to acted in this instance and I wonder if the emphasis NT placed in his interview on the “ unique culture” might in some way be being interpreted in some quarters as “they have to fit into our set up because we ain’t going to adapt to theirs” sort of thing? Probably just over thinking it tbhdOh Nut wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:49 pmA positive culture is not a closed shop. I’d go so far as to say it’s quite the opposite.redintheface wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:45 pm
I think your interpretation is probably on the money. The whole episode does leave me with an uneasy feeling however that there is a bit of a “ closed shop” mentality within the coaching set up and playing staff, eyeing up “ outsiders” suspiciously and not doing very much at all to help them bed in which is aided and abetted by NT’s take on the “ unique” culture of the club?![]()
Actually I suspect that he is feeling sh*t. His pay-off will no doubt not be substantial given the speed with which he was removed (under a month - which I don't think is insignificant). Worse than that is that his chances of getting another management job have just fallen off a cliff. He's probably sitting at home wondering how his dream of being a successful manager has gone so wrong. He's probably asking himself some pretty tough questions and probably wondering what he does next and if he'll ever get an opportunity like this one again.Pandy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:15 pmI'm sure he's walking away with a bag of cash and it was a joint decision so I doubt he's feeling sh*t.
I think you're making up stuff. There's no grounds for most of what you've written there with regards to either man.Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:22 pm Its not about players and staff making a manager unwelcome. Its a manager's job to get the best out of the players and it seems that JE got the best out of them because he understood that this group needed to have a father figure, someone who they could bond with, someone who took a lot of the pressure off of them. Someone who didn't tell them how he wanted them to play regardless of their feelings on the subject. Carl Fletcher didn't seem to understand that. He came in and just tried to have them train the way he wanted and play the way he wanted without taking anyone with him. Without JE's grasp of players' desires and insecurities Fletcher just expected people to get on board. That's bad management not obstructive staff.
Bet he is feeling sh*t too. His career has taken a battering. Wonder if he can get his old job back at Bournemouth.Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:26 pmActually I suspect that he is feeling sh*t. His pay-off will no doubt not be substantial given the speed with which he was removed (under a month - which I don't think is insignificant). Worse than that is that his chances of getting another management job have just fallen off a cliff. He's probably sitting at home wondering how his dream of being a successful manager has gone so wrong. He's probably asking himself some pretty tough questions and probably wondering what he does next and if he'll ever get an opportunity like this one again.
Would they even want him back?dOh Nut wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:29 pmBet he is feeling sh*t too. His career has taken a battering. Wonder if he can get his old job back at Bournemouth.Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:26 pmActually I suspect that he is feeling sh*t. His pay-off will no doubt not be substantial given the speed with which he was removed (under a month - which I don't think is insignificant). Worse than that is that his chances of getting another management job have just fallen off a cliff. He's probably sitting at home wondering how his dream of being a successful manager has gone so wrong. He's probably asking himself some pretty tough questions and probably wondering what he does next and if he'll ever get an opportunity like this one again.