The previous quarter was -. 2 so now we have plus .4 a movement of plus .6 annualised is 2.4%
I don't think you understand how gdp is calculated
How?
And in particular which of the various ways are you referring to.
And based on that what is your figure.
Not going into the details of the various ways in which gdp can be calculated but more that it's indexed from 0 each quarter, so the movement over the quarter was not +0.6
I don't think you understand how gdp is calculated
How?
And in particular which of the various ways are you referring to.
And based on that what is your figure.
Not going into the details of the various ways in which gdp can be calculated but more that it's indexed from 0 each quarter, so the movement over the quarter was not +0.6
Correct adz, but if you re-read my post I never the quarter was 0.6 I said the swing was 0.6%
I don't think you understand how gdp is calculated
How?
And in particular which of the various ways are you referring to.
And based on that what is your figure.
Not going into the details of the various ways in which gdp can be calculated but more that it's indexed from 0 each quarter, so the movement over the quarter was not +0.6
Not what the post said. You’ve misread it then said it was wrong.
And in particular which of the various ways are you referring to.
And based on that what is your figure.
Not going into the details of the various ways in which gdp can be calculated but more that it's indexed from 0 each quarter, so the movement over the quarter was not +0.6
Not what the post said. You’ve misread it then said it was wrong.
But you can't annualise by multiplying a swing x4 surely?
