gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:24 pmWhere do we begin...tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:16 pmWhy can we not afford it ?RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:56 pm
He knows better than most our recent history and so why we're like this . We simply can NOT afford to get relegated again back down to the National League . With Fletcher in charge that could well happen .We've just been outplayed by the worse team the league and knocked out the FA Cup by a team four divisions below us . Something is terribly wrong . Ross had bad patches but he had the same players digging in and getting results . All that fight , passion and desire Ross built in his last few games has now gone . Look at our fighting spirit against Port Vale , where has that disappeared too.
- loss of TV money
How many times were we live ladt season ?
Dont think we lost to much
- loss of income from away fan gates at NL vs L2
Really notts county stockport wrexham & a few others to
- reduction in ST income
2 record season ticket sales in National league for us wasnt it .
- loss of funding for the beloved academy (leading to eventual closure)
Takes 2 years for that to happen
Savings of needing to produce young players with no gaurentee of making money back on 2 let alone all
- inability to balance the books with Hearn's ever-increasing rent charges.
Hearn reduced the rent for non league ( at very least froze it while we were there.
If we go down it'll be a blow I don't think the club will recover from
What happened in 2016/17 then in 2018/9 ?
Kent Teague Twitter
Moderator: Long slender neck
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
We are still here arent wegshaw wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:24 pmWhere do we begin...tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:16 pmWhy can we not afford it ?RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:56 pm
He knows better than most our recent history and so why we're like this . We simply can NOT afford to get relegated again back down to the National League . With Fletcher in charge that could well happen .We've just been outplayed by the worse team the league and knocked out the FA Cup by a team four divisions below us . Something is terribly wrong . Ross had bad patches but he had the same players digging in and getting results . All that fight , passion and desire Ross built in his last few games has now gone . Look at our fighting spirit against Port Vale , where has that disappeared too.
- loss of TV money
How many times were we live last season ?
Dont think we lost to much
- loss of income from away fan gates at NL vs L2
Really notts county stockport wrexham & a few others to
- reduction in ST income
2 record season ticket sales in National league for us wasnt it .
- loss of funding for the beloved academy (leading to eventual closure)
Takes 2 years for that to happen
Savings of needing to produce young players with no gaurentee of making money back on 1 let alone all
- inability to balance the books with Hearn's ever-increasing rent charges.
Hearn reduced the rent for non league ( at very least froze it while we were there.
If we go down it'll be a blow I don't think the club will recover from
What happened in 2016/17 then in 2018/9 ?
- F*ck The Poor & Fat
- Regular
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 380 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
Not to mention a reduction in the money Macklin brings in as sponsors lose interest in being associated with failure. Relegation will be a big dealgshaw wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:24 pmWhere do we begin...tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:16 pmWhy can we not afford it ?RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:56 pm
He knows better than most our recent history and so why we're like this . We simply can NOT afford to get relegated again back down to the National League . With Fletcher in charge that could well happen .We've just been outplayed by the worse team the league and knocked out the FA Cup by a team four divisions below us . Something is terribly wrong . Ross had bad patches but he had the same players digging in and getting results . All that fight , passion and desire Ross built in his last few games has now gone . Look at our fighting spirit against Port Vale , where has that disappeared too.
- loss of TV money
- loss of income from away fan gates at NL vs L2
- reduction in ST income
- loss of funding for the beloved academy (leading to eventual closure)
- inability to balance the books with Hearn's ever-increasing rent charges
If we go down it'll be a blow I don't think the club will recover from
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13059
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 2655 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
Exactly. Now was not the time to take a gambledOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 11:10 pmNot to mention a reduction in the money Macklin brings in as sponsors lose interest in being associated with failure. Relegation will be a big dealgshaw wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:24 pmWhere do we begin...
- loss of TV money
- loss of income from away fan gates at NL vs L2
- reduction in ST income
- loss of funding for the beloved academy (leading to eventual closure)
- inability to balance the books with Hearn's ever-increasing rent charges
If we go down it'll be a blow I don't think the club will recover from
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:39 pm
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 46 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
This is the bit that confuses me. Surely we would have been able to pay someone what we were paying Justin beforehand? If Fletcher is on the same or more money than Justin it beggars believe what they are doing hiring him.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:21 pmPorter says as much in the podcast "fits within the income and infrastructure"Frogger wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:53 pm100% been saying this from the start. I just think this was the cheapest option.PoundhillO wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:49 pm Only to be expected, Fletcher is not the proven experienced manager needed at this level required to push us forward to get promotion, more like get us relegated.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
Don’t place too much on that quote though. We have a budget for sure let’s say it’s £100k salary, the reality is we will not get Mourinho in so the cloth is cut to meet the budgeted salary. Hence people like Fletch get an interview.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:21 pmPorter says as much in the podcast "fits within the income and infrastructure"Frogger wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:53 pm100% been saying this from the start. I just think this was the cheapest option.PoundhillO wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:49 pm Only to be expected, Fletcher is not the proven experienced manager needed at this level required to push us forward to get promotion, more like get us relegated.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 229 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
The budgetary constraints and the club’s position in the EFL structure will always be a turn off for some coaches/ manager’s that the fans view as prospective candidates for the job. The Board however shot themselves in the foot by insisting that the existing back room staff must remain intact and then ruling out individuals who had multiple former club’s on their CV thereby restricting the field still further. Unnecessary and potentially serious mistakes.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
Sort of. The club has put in place the dof role with a coaching team to provide continuity, i kind of like this and think it is the right way to work in this day and age.
Till now ML has done a great job and I’ve said that enough times on here however, he has messed up with this appointment. He is blind to the holding midfielder that the team requires. I would be fine if he keeps his job for sure, but he needs to get his sh*t together pretty dam quick.
As for the coaching team staying on, I like that principle however, it does need to be balanced off against “are they good enough for the level we are at” so this needs to be a continuing evolution as we move forwards as a club. Are they good enough now, I’d say yes and like I’ve said before if Justin had been alive we would be challenging for the title of that I’m sure. What they need is direction, leadership and someone to look up to and respect and it seems to me that fletch lacks all of that.
I didn’t get Porters comment of “if you’ve had multiple jobs” then we are not looking at you, strange in the extreme. Pep has managed Barca, Bayern and now City, would he be counted out on the basis of multiple jobs? Foolish is the word that springs to mind.
Till now ML has done a great job and I’ve said that enough times on here however, he has messed up with this appointment. He is blind to the holding midfielder that the team requires. I would be fine if he keeps his job for sure, but he needs to get his sh*t together pretty dam quick.
As for the coaching team staying on, I like that principle however, it does need to be balanced off against “are they good enough for the level we are at” so this needs to be a continuing evolution as we move forwards as a club. Are they good enough now, I’d say yes and like I’ve said before if Justin had been alive we would be challenging for the title of that I’m sure. What they need is direction, leadership and someone to look up to and respect and it seems to me that fletch lacks all of that.
I didn’t get Porters comment of “if you’ve had multiple jobs” then we are not looking at you, strange in the extreme. Pep has managed Barca, Bayern and now City, would he be counted out on the basis of multiple jobs? Foolish is the word that springs to mind.
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
Think we have to take Porter's comment with a pinch of salt.... designed so that it looks like Fletcher was always the outstanding candidate.
Reality is, had an experienced manager who had won the League before agreed to work within the restrictive terms we set out we may have gone for him, but nobody is going to be saying that now, it is a little undermining to everyone involved.
I think Porter has form for saying things he doesn't mean, seem to recall him being bullish about us making playoffs under Davis when we were bad, when challenged later on with the complete lack of evidence for this on Twitter he said he could not have said the truth, what did you expect him to say (I paraphrase here, but that is the general point).
I do believe in future we will get a manager with several successes and sackings on his CV, Porter will be asked about his comment and he will give a similar response. That's what I want to believe, anyway.
Reality is, had an experienced manager who had won the League before agreed to work within the restrictive terms we set out we may have gone for him, but nobody is going to be saying that now, it is a little undermining to everyone involved.
I think Porter has form for saying things he doesn't mean, seem to recall him being bullish about us making playoffs under Davis when we were bad, when challenged later on with the complete lack of evidence for this on Twitter he said he could not have said the truth, what did you expect him to say (I paraphrase here, but that is the general point).
I do believe in future we will get a manager with several successes and sackings on his CV, Porter will be asked about his comment and he will give a similar response. That's what I want to believe, anyway.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
I get the idea of giving someone a chance. It’s just this guy should never have been the one to be given a chance when it’s so clear he hasn’t got what it takes to lead a club like ours.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 229 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
Well I suppose Porter was Hearn’s right hand man for a long spell so he may not have a close acquaintance with the truth!eagwgw wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:55 am Think we have to take Porter's comment with a pinch of salt.... designed so that it looks like Fletcher was always the outstanding candidate.
Reality is, had an experienced manager who had won the League before agreed to work within the restrictive terms we set out we may have gone for him, but nobody is going to be saying that now, it is a little undermining to everyone involved.
I think Porter has form for saying things he doesn't mean, seem to recall him being bullish about us making playoffs under Davis when we were bad, when challenged later on with the complete lack of evidence for this on Twitter he said he could not have said the truth, what did you expect him to say (I paraphrase here, but that is the general point).
I do believe in future we will get a manager with several successes and sackings on his CV, Porter will be asked about his comment and he will give a similar response. That's what I want to believe, anyway.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
I can’t speak for his honesty or integrity and I’ve nothing to suggest he lacks either. What I can speak about is his performance as chief at our club. When we played Arsenal and the play offs especially after 2 odd hours in a queue I asked him about improving the ticketing operation as what we had in place was not fit for purpose to cover such large games. His reposnce was “well what do you expect me to do?” Put in place a better system, one that meets the needs and expectations of the fans. Whilst he could not implement a new ticket system or whatever at that time he could have had open more points from which to purchase tickets, more flexibility, hire in some mobile pdq machines so as to process more tickets quicker and so on. Still he kept to the 4 windows and it took forever. I lost a lot of respect for him after that, especially as he’s a fan and he knows what fans want and what they think like. Still I hope he learnt from that episode.
It’s almost as bad a fletchs if we knew that we’d all be millionaires comment.
It’s almost as bad a fletchs if we knew that we’d all be millionaires comment.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5806 times
- Been thanked: 1083 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
@ThorThor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:39 am Sort of. The club has put in place the dof role with a coaching team to provide continuity, i kind of like this and think it is the right way to work in this day and age.
Till now ML has done a great job and I’ve said that enough times on here however, he has messed up with this appointment. He is blind to the holding midfielder that the team requires. I would be fine if he keeps his job for sure, but he needs to get his sh*t together pretty dam quick.
As for the coaching team staying on, I like that principle however, it does need to be balanced off against “are they good enough for the level we are at” so this needs to be a continuing evolution as we move forwards as a club. Are they good enough now, I’d say yes and like I’ve said before if Justin had been alive we would be challenging for the title of that I’m sure. What they need is direction, leadership and someone to look up to and respect and it seems to me that fletch lacks all of that.
I didn’t get Porters comment of “if you’ve had multiple jobs” then we are not looking at you, strange in the extreme. Pep has managed Barca, Bayern and now City, would he be counted out on the basis of multiple jobs? Foolish is the word that springs to mind.
You have made some good points in the above post.
I particularly agree with the following..............
1 '' He is blind to the holding midfielder that the team requires.''
2 “if you’ve had multiple jobs” then we are not looking at you, strange in the extreme. Pep has managed Barca, Bayern and now City, would he be counted out on the basis of multiple jobs? Foolish is the word that springs to mind.''
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 929 times
- Been thanked: 985 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
On what basis is it the right way to work? A man out of his depth has given a group of people jobs for life and built a system where the manager takes sole responsibility for anything that goes wrong but it's shared if it goes right. The players know that the manager's position is never secure and the coaching staff/Ling are the ones in actual control.Thor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:39 am Sort of. The club has put in place the dof role with a coaching team to provide continuity, i kind of like this and think it is the right way to work in this day and age.
Till now ML has done a great job and I’ve said that enough times on here however, he has messed up with this appointment. He is blind to the holding midfielder that the team requires. I would be fine if he keeps his job for sure, but he needs to get his sh*t together pretty dam quick.
As for the coaching team staying on, I like that principle however, it does need to be balanced off against “are they good enough for the level we are at” so this needs to be a continuing evolution as we move forwards as a club. Are they good enough now, I’d say yes and like I’ve said before if Justin had been alive we would be challenging for the title of that I’m sure. What they need is direction, leadership and someone to look up to and respect and it seems to me that fletch lacks all of that.
I didn’t get Porters comment of “if you’ve had multiple jobs” then we are not looking at you, strange in the extreme. Pep has managed Barca, Bayern and now City, would he be counted out on the basis of multiple jobs? Foolish is the word that springs to mind.
Martin Ling has not done a great job. His recruitment is awful. His choice of 3 out of 4 managers has been awful. Being a nice bloke does not compensate for bad decisions. How is he blind to needing a holding midfielder? He signed George Marsh, who is a holding midfielder. Whether he is good enough is a different matter.
Justin wouldn't have had this lot challenging for a title. They're a mid-table team at best. He was a good motivator who understood his team's needs but tactically found wanting a lot.
This alongside your support for Boris Johnson has shown you up as clueless.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:06 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 455 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
I think Biggsy has hit the nail on the head. I saw the need for ML as our owner's point man when they're away, but that seems to have made him bulletproof.
The question is not so much what does he do, but what is he judged upon. It's fine to take a share of the glory or the blame, but there must be somethings that are his responsibility, and his alone. I do believe the owners are under the impression he is an Orient legend, and are maybe a little in awe of him.
The question is not so much what does he do, but what is he judged upon. It's fine to take a share of the glory or the blame, but there must be somethings that are his responsibility, and his alone. I do believe the owners are under the impression he is an Orient legend, and are maybe a little in awe of him.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
So cos you had to queue u threw your dummy out the pramThor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:31 am I can’t speak for his honesty or integrity and I’ve nothing to suggest he lacks either. What I can speak about is his performance as chief at our club. When we played Arsenal and the play offs especially after 2 odd hours in a queue I asked him about improving the ticketing operation as what we had in place was not fit for purpose to cover such large games. His reposnce was “well what do you expect me to do?” Put in place a better system, one that meets the needs and expectations of the fans. Whilst he could not implement a new ticket system or whatever at that time he could have had open more points from which to purchase tickets, more flexibility, hire in some mobile pdq machines so as to process more tickets quicker and so on. Still he kept to the 4 windows and it took forever. I lost a lot of respect for him after that, especially as he’s a fan and he knows what fans want and what they think like. Still I hope he learnt from that episode.
It’s almost as bad a fletchs if we knew that we’d all be millionaires comment.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 11:37 am
- Has thanked: 326 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: Kent Teague Twitter
You were doing fine till last sentence, leave my Boris aloneBiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:06 amOn what basis is it the right way to work? A man out of his depth has given a group of people jobs for life and built a system where the manager takes sole responsibility for anything that goes wrong but it's shared if it goes right. The players know that the manager's position is never secure and the coaching staff/Ling are the ones in actual control.Thor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:39 am Sort of. The club has put in place the dof role with a coaching team to provide continuity, i kind of like this and think it is the right way to work in this day and age.
Till now ML has done a great job and I’ve said that enough times on here however, he has messed up with this appointment. He is blind to the holding midfielder that the team requires. I would be fine if he keeps his job for sure, but he needs to get his sh*t together pretty dam quick.
As for the coaching team staying on, I like that principle however, it does need to be balanced off against “are they good enough for the level we are at” so this needs to be a continuing evolution as we move forwards as a club. Are they good enough now, I’d say yes and like I’ve said before if Justin had been alive we would be challenging for the title of that I’m sure. What they need is direction, leadership and someone to look up to and respect and it seems to me that fletch lacks all of that.
I didn’t get Porters comment of “if you’ve had multiple jobs” then we are not looking at you, strange in the extreme. Pep has managed Barca, Bayern and now City, would he be counted out on the basis of multiple jobs? Foolish is the word that springs to mind.
Martin Ling has not done a great job. His recruitment is awful. His choice of 3 out of 4 managers has been awful. Being a nice bloke does not compensate for bad decisions. How is he blind to needing a holding midfielder? He signed George Marsh, who is a holding midfielder. Whether he is good enough is a different matter.
Justin wouldn't have had this lot challenging for a title. They're a mid-table team at best. He was a good motivator who understood his team's needs but tactically found wanting a lot.
This alongside your support for Boris Johnson has shown you up as clueless.