Rachel Markle
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4724
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2070 times
- Been thanked: 1695 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1158 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Rachel Markle
When was she exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff?UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:07 amAgreed Joe it was not a very good post and certainly not to my usual standard of excellence.
Simply Joe the message is to some on here;
1. Don't write when you are ill informed, inarticulate or full of conjecture particularly on football.
2. Do not continue the saga after a defeat of being exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff and then flip the other way the following week when we win or draw
I'm confused
Thought this was a thread about Ms Markle. Not clear she has ever publicly commented about Orient
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:23 am
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Rachel Markle
It's her second marriage? Though she comes across very badly, so does Harry since he's been with her.Thor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:10 pm Look at her history. This is her 3rd marriage, she has dumped everyone as shes climbed the greasy pole. Shes dropped her own family including her dad, she is a manipulating person, she has split up william and harry. She is only out for what she can get, she does not come across as a nice person.
Shes a former yacht girl, a former escort allegedly she is not a nice person.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:57 pm
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Adherence to point 1 would greatly reduce the output of many boarders (myself included).UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:07 amAgreed Joe it was not a very good post and certainly not to my usual standard of excellence.
Simply Joe the message is to some on here;
1. Don't write when you are ill informed, inarticulate or full of conjecture particularly on football.
2. Do not continue the saga after a defeat of being exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff and then flip the other way the following week when we win or draw
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1158 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Rachel Markle?UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:36 amSince April when you joined you have posted 41 times only that's not very many.LeighO wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:19 amAdherence to point 1 would greatly reduce the output of many boarders (myself included).UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:07 am
Agreed Joe it was not a very good post and certainly not to my usual standard of excellence.
Simply Joe the message is to some on here;
1. Don't write when you are ill informed, inarticulate or full of conjecture particularly on football.
2. Do not continue the saga after a defeat of being exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff and then flip the other way the following week when we win or draw
A few on here post non stop on every subject daily often deliberately being rude to the players and certain staff members when we lose - for reasons not associated with basic decent behaviour
- Howling Mad Murdock
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2355
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:55 am
- Has thanked: 1781 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
- Contact:
Re: Rachel Markle
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/50176037
They are all at it.
But his former rival Fernando Alonso told Spanish radio: "I would never release a message like Lewis. You can't send out a message one day and the next day do the opposite.
"We all know the lifestyle that Lewis has, and that Formula 1 drivers take 200 planes a year. You can't then say: 'Don't eat meat.'"
Marvelous.
They are all at it.
But his former rival Fernando Alonso told Spanish radio: "I would never release a message like Lewis. You can't send out a message one day and the next day do the opposite.
"We all know the lifestyle that Lewis has, and that Formula 1 drivers take 200 planes a year. You can't then say: 'Don't eat meat.'"
Marvelous.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4724
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2070 times
- Been thanked: 1695 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.Oforever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:34 amIt's her second marriage? Though she comes across very badly, so does Harry since he's been with her.Thor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:10 pm Look at her history. This is her 3rd marriage, she has dumped everyone as shes climbed the greasy pole. Shes dropped her own family including her dad, she is a manipulating person, she has split up william and harry. She is only out for what she can get, she does not come across as a nice person.
Shes a former yacht girl, a former escort allegedly she is not a nice person.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Frogmore alledegly spent 3m on the gaff and they don't live there.
Private planes, then tell us to cut down
Pushes Harry out of the way to greet people before him breaking protocol
Patronises the people of south Africa with hand me down clothes making them look silly
Gets her friends to leak the private letter she wrote to her dad to the press, then when her dad releases parts of it she sues the paper!
Says no one asks if I'm ok? Did she ask her dad if he was ok after his heart attack? Nope
Harry is captain general of the marines and she forces him to cancel an historic event to attend the lion king premier cos they were paid 3m from Disney, yes you read that correctly they were paid 3m pounds!
There is so much you could give examples for, she is a narcissist
Private planes, then tell us to cut down
Pushes Harry out of the way to greet people before him breaking protocol
Patronises the people of south Africa with hand me down clothes making them look silly
Gets her friends to leak the private letter she wrote to her dad to the press, then when her dad releases parts of it she sues the paper!
Says no one asks if I'm ok? Did she ask her dad if he was ok after his heart attack? Nope
Harry is captain general of the marines and she forces him to cancel an historic event to attend the lion king premier cos they were paid 3m from Disney, yes you read that correctly they were paid 3m pounds!
There is so much you could give examples for, she is a narcissist
- Howling Mad Murdock
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2355
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:55 am
- Has thanked: 1781 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
- Contact:
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:23 am
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Well that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pmWhy do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.Oforever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:34 amIt's her second marriage? Though she comes across very badly, so does Harry since he's been with her.Thor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:10 pm Look at her history. This is her 3rd marriage, she has dumped everyone as shes climbed the greasy pole. Shes dropped her own family including her dad, she is a manipulating person, she has split up william and harry. She is only out for what she can get, she does not come across as a nice person.
Shes a former yacht girl, a former escort allegedly she is not a nice person.
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Eh?UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:36 amSince April when you joined you have posted 41 times only that's not very many.LeighO wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:19 amAdherence to point 1 would greatly reduce the output of many boarders (myself included).UpminsterO wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:07 am
Agreed Joe it was not a very good post and certainly not to my usual standard of excellence.
Simply Joe the message is to some on here;
1. Don't write when you are ill informed, inarticulate or full of conjecture particularly on football.
2. Do not continue the saga after a defeat of being exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff and then flip the other way the following week when we win or draw
A few on here post non stop on every subject daily often deliberately being rude to the players and certain staff members when we lose - for reasons not associated with basic decent behaviour
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4724
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2070 times
- Been thanked: 1695 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Not wanting press intrusion and being concerned for the environment is coming across badly? Righto.Oforever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 9:46 amWell that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pmWhy do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1158 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:57 pmNot wanting press intrusion and being concerned for the environment is coming across badly? Righto.Oforever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 9:46 amWell that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pm
Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
Using a voluntary TV interview to complain about press intrusion or
Lecturing the world about climate change whilst flying around on jaunts in private jets
These sort of hypocritical actions for some strange reason never go down well with some people
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4724
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2070 times
- Been thanked: 1695 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Odd, cos Prince Charles doesn't attract the same vitriol for banging on about the environment despite his own dubious antics, nor does Prince Andrew. Just can't she's black work out she's black what the difference she's black could be.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Didn’t the other princess married to the other brother spend bundles doing up their house at our expense? I don’t remember the same sort of hatred aimed her way then (or now). I just can’t work out what’s different this time?Oforever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 9:46 amWell that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pmWhy do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
- F*ck The Poor & Fat
- Regular
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 380 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Yeh, but it’s an organic bee and a green bonnet. Or was that bee a green hornet.Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:10 pm Thor has really got a bee in his bonnet over this one.
- Howling Mad Murdock
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2355
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:55 am
- Has thanked: 1781 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
- Contact:
Re: Rachel Markle
Thor ferk sake!dOh Nut wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:09 pmYeh, but it’s an organic bee and a green bonnet. Or was that bee a green hornet.Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:10 pm Thor has really got a bee in his bonnet over this one.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Rachel Markle
They did complain about press intrusion. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19595221
So come on, what’s everyone’s real issue with this new princess?
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:17 pm
- Has thanked: 314 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Ok, I'll say it for you. She's a bloody Yank ! Happy now.RedO wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:09 pmThey did complain about press intrusion. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19595221
So come on, what’s everyone’s real issue with this new princess?
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Rachel Markle
Err she doesn't see herself as black, she puts down on forms shes white. Dont believe me use google and you'll see her profiles showing exactly that.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:19 pm Odd, cos Prince Charles doesn't attract the same vitriol for banging on about the environment despite his own dubious antics, nor does Prince Andrew. Just can't she's black work out she's black what the difference she's black could be.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Rachel Markle
She does not live in that cottage for a start.RedO wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 5:16 pmDidn’t the other princess married to the other brother spend bundles doing up their house at our expense? I don’t remember the same sort of hatred aimed her way then (or now). I just can’t work out what’s different this time?Oforever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 9:46 amWell that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pm
Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.