Rachel Markle

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2070 times
Been thanked: 1695 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Proposition Joe »

That was an uberramble.
spen666
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by spen666 »

UpminsterO wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:07 am
Proposition Joe wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:38 am That was an uberramble.
Agreed Joe it was not a very good post and certainly not to my usual standard of excellence.

Simply Joe the message is to some on here;

1. Don't write when you are ill informed, inarticulate or full of conjecture particularly on football.
2. Do not continue the saga after a defeat of being exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff and then flip the other way the following week when we win or draw
When was she exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff?

I'm confused

Thought this was a thread about Ms Markle. Not clear she has ever publicly commented about Orient
Oforever
Fresh Alias
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:23 am
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Oforever »

Thor wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:10 pm Look at her history. This is her 3rd marriage, she has dumped everyone as shes climbed the greasy pole. Shes dropped her own family including her dad, she is a manipulating person, she has split up william and harry. She is only out for what she can get, she does not come across as a nice person.

Shes a former yacht girl, a former escort allegedly she is not a nice person.
It's her second marriage? Though she comes across very badly, so does Harry since he's been with her.
O my gawd
Fresh Alias
Posts: 704
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 12:05 pm
Has thanked: 630 times
Been thanked: 255 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by O my gawd »

Dcesy_-X0AEQcId..jpg
Dcesy_-X0AEQcId..jpg (24.85 KiB) Viewed 588 times
LeighO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:57 pm
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by LeighO »

UpminsterO wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:07 am
Proposition Joe wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:38 am That was an uberramble.
Agreed Joe it was not a very good post and certainly not to my usual standard of excellence.

Simply Joe the message is to some on here;

1. Don't write when you are ill informed, inarticulate or full of conjecture particularly on football.
2. Do not continue the saga after a defeat of being exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff and then flip the other way the following week when we win or draw
Adherence to point 1 would greatly reduce the output of many boarders (myself included).
spen666
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by spen666 »

UpminsterO wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:36 am
LeighO wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:19 am
UpminsterO wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:07 am

Agreed Joe it was not a very good post and certainly not to my usual standard of excellence.

Simply Joe the message is to some on here;

1. Don't write when you are ill informed, inarticulate or full of conjecture particularly on football.
2. Do not continue the saga after a defeat of being exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff and then flip the other way the following week when we win or draw
Adherence to point 1 would greatly reduce the output of many boarders (myself included).
Since April when you joined you have posted 41 times only that's not very many.
A few on here post non stop on every subject daily often deliberately being rude to the players and certain staff members when we lose - for reasons not associated with basic decent behaviour
Rachel Markle?
User avatar
Howling Mad Murdock
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:55 am
Has thanked: 1781 times
Been thanked: 344 times
Contact:

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Howling Mad Murdock »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/50176037

They are all at it.

But his former rival Fernando Alonso told Spanish radio: "I would never release a message like Lewis. You can't send out a message one day and the next day do the opposite.

"We all know the lifestyle that Lewis has, and that Formula 1 drivers take 200 planes a year. You can't then say: 'Don't eat meat.'"


Marvelous. :)
JimbO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1165
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by JimbO »

RedO wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:06 pm Strange that out of all the Royals, she's the one people seem to be focusing their vitriol towards. I can't imagine why.
Yawn
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2070 times
Been thanked: 1695 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Proposition Joe »

Oforever wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:34 am
Thor wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:10 pm Look at her history. This is her 3rd marriage, she has dumped everyone as shes climbed the greasy pole. Shes dropped her own family including her dad, she is a manipulating person, she has split up william and harry. She is only out for what she can get, she does not come across as a nice person.

Shes a former yacht girl, a former escort allegedly she is not a nice person.
It's her second marriage? Though she comes across very badly, so does Harry since he's been with her.
Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Thor »

Frogmore alledegly spent 3m on the gaff and they don't live there.

Private planes, then tell us to cut down

Pushes Harry out of the way to greet people before him breaking protocol

Patronises the people of south Africa with hand me down clothes making them look silly

Gets her friends to leak the private letter she wrote to her dad to the press, then when her dad releases parts of it she sues the paper!

Says no one asks if I'm ok? Did she ask her dad if he was ok after his heart attack? Nope

Harry is captain general of the marines and she forces him to cancel an historic event to attend the lion king premier cos they were paid 3m from Disney, yes you read that correctly they were paid 3m pounds!

There is so much you could give examples for, she is a narcissist
User avatar
Howling Mad Murdock
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:55 am
Has thanked: 1781 times
Been thanked: 344 times
Contact:

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Howling Mad Murdock »

Thor has really got a bee in his bonnet over this one.
Oforever
Fresh Alias
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:23 am
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Oforever »

Proposition Joe wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pm
Oforever wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:34 am
Thor wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:10 pm Look at her history. This is her 3rd marriage, she has dumped everyone as shes climbed the greasy pole. Shes dropped her own family including her dad, she is a manipulating person, she has split up william and harry. She is only out for what she can get, she does not come across as a nice person.

Shes a former yacht girl, a former escort allegedly she is not a nice person.
It's her second marriage? Though she comes across very badly, so does Harry since he's been with her.
Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
Well that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Disoriented »

UpminsterO wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:36 am
LeighO wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:19 am
UpminsterO wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:07 am

Agreed Joe it was not a very good post and certainly not to my usual standard of excellence.

Simply Joe the message is to some on here;

1. Don't write when you are ill informed, inarticulate or full of conjecture particularly on football.
2. Do not continue the saga after a defeat of being exceptionally rude on a personal level to any Lofc team footballer or member of staff and then flip the other way the following week when we win or draw
Adherence to point 1 would greatly reduce the output of many boarders (myself included).
Since April when you joined you have posted 41 times only that's not very many.
A few on here post non stop on every subject daily often deliberately being rude to the players and certain staff members when we lose - for reasons not associated with basic decent behaviour
Eh?
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2070 times
Been thanked: 1695 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Proposition Joe »

Oforever wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 9:46 am
Proposition Joe wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pm
Oforever wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:34 am

It's her second marriage? Though she comes across very badly, so does Harry since he's been with her.
Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
Well that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.
Not wanting press intrusion and being concerned for the environment is coming across badly? Righto.
spen666
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by spen666 »

Proposition Joe wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:57 pm
Oforever wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 9:46 am
Proposition Joe wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pm

Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
Well that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.
Not wanting press intrusion and being concerned for the environment is coming across badly? Righto.


Using a voluntary TV interview to complain about press intrusion or
Lecturing the world about climate change whilst flying around on jaunts in private jets

These sort of hypocritical actions for some strange reason never go down well with some people
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2070 times
Been thanked: 1695 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Proposition Joe »

Odd, cos Prince Charles doesn't attract the same vitriol for banging on about the environment despite his own dubious antics, nor does Prince Andrew. Just can't she's black work out she's black what the difference she's black could be.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Oforever wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 9:46 am
Proposition Joe wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pm
Oforever wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:34 am

It's her second marriage? Though she comes across very badly, so does Harry since he's been with her.
Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
Well that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.
Didn’t the other princess married to the other brother spend bundles doing up their house at our expense? I don’t remember the same sort of hatred aimed her way then (or now). I just can’t work out what’s different this time? 🤷🏾‍♀️
Oforever
Fresh Alias
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:23 am
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Oforever »

Well they didn't refuse to name godparents and complain about press intrusion etc etc
User avatar
F*ck The Poor & Fat
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3101
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 380 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by F*ck The Poor & Fat »

Howling Mad Murdock wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:10 pm Thor has really got a bee in his bonnet over this one.
Yeh, but it’s an organic bee and a green bonnet. Or was that bee a green hornet.
User avatar
Howling Mad Murdock
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:55 am
Has thanked: 1781 times
Been thanked: 344 times
Contact:

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Howling Mad Murdock »

dOh Nut wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:09 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:10 pm Thor has really got a bee in his bonnet over this one.
Yeh, but it’s an organic bee and a green bonnet. Or was that bee a green hornet.
Thor ferk sake! :P
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Oforever wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:13 pm Well they didn't refuse to name godparents and complain about press intrusion etc etc
They did complain about press intrusion. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19595221

So come on, what’s everyone’s real issue with this new princess? 🤷🏾‍♀️
Tom Chance
Fresh Alias
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:17 pm
Has thanked: 314 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Tom Chance »

RedO wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:09 pm
Oforever wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:13 pm Well they didn't refuse to name godparents and complain about press intrusion etc etc
They did complain about press intrusion. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19595221

So come on, what’s everyone’s real issue with this new princess? 🤷🏾‍♀️
Ok, I'll say it for you. She's a bloody Yank ! Happy now.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Thor »

Proposition Joe wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:19 pm Odd, cos Prince Charles doesn't attract the same vitriol for banging on about the environment despite his own dubious antics, nor does Prince Andrew. Just can't she's black work out she's black what the difference she's black could be.
Err she doesn't see herself as black, she puts down on forms shes white. Dont believe me use google and you'll see her profiles showing exactly that.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Thor »

RedO wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 5:16 pm
Oforever wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2019 9:46 am
Proposition Joe wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:23 pm

Why do they come across badly? Specific incidents and reasons.
Well that nonsense about naming godparents. Not wanting pics of baby, not wanting press to "intrude", talking about climate change whilst taking private jets. Oh and despite all that spending 2.5 million of our money doing up their house. I could go on but that's enough for now.
Didn’t the other princess married to the other brother spend bundles doing up their house at our expense? I don’t remember the same sort of hatred aimed her way then (or now). I just can’t work out what’s different this time? 🤷🏾‍♀️
She does not live in that cottage for a start.
Stowaway
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1295
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:11 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 418 times

Re: Rachel Markle

Post by Stowaway »

F**king state of this thread.
Post Reply