Why are we insisting on the
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1027 times
- Been thanked: 922 times
Why are we insisting on the
Backroom team staying as a prerequisite and even that Ling stays? This guy we are interviewing has had one job in 6 years as a manager and was rubbish assuming managing is a results business. One can only assume most credible candidates want to bring in their own people. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than me can answer whether it is normal for a club to insist on current staff staying or do most clubs who get a new manager allow them to have Carte blanche over hires?
- ComeOnYouOs
- Regular
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
- Awards: Colossal berk
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Just posted much the same thing on another thread
I agree it isnt usual
I agree it isnt usual
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14354
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2524 times
- Been thanked: 3315 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
We have a successful structure. Should we tear it up just because Justin died? Existing setup didn't stop Justin from joining. I'm sure experienced managers applied this time around but maybe there is something in this guy that the board have seen?
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
The message board?Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 pm We have a successful structure. Should we tear it up just because Justin died? Existing setup didn't stop Justin from joining. I'm sure experienced managers applied this time around but maybe there is something in this guy that the board have seen?
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 219 times
- Been thanked: 335 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
You’re right of course it didn’t stop JE joining but was it a precondition that RE and Webb stayed in place when he took over? ( rhetorical question).Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 pm We have a successful structure. Should we tear it up just because Justin died? Existing setup didn't stop Justin from joining. I'm sure experienced managers applied this time around but maybe there is something in this guy that the board have seen?
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Good point. You cannot tell me that Fletcher was the best of the 40 candidates who was happy to accept this.redintheface wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:32 pmYou’re right of course it didn’t stop JE joining but was it a precondition that RE and Webb stayed in place when he took over? ( rhetorical question).Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 pm We have a successful structure. Should we tear it up just because Justin died? Existing setup didn't stop Justin from joining. I'm sure experienced managers applied this time around but maybe there is something in this guy that the board have seen?
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1027 times
- Been thanked: 922 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
A successful structure in terms of we got out of non league. I don’t see much success elsewhere. We used to be known as a solid championship level club and for however many years since we just make up the numbers. I am running out of years to see us achieve something so forgive me for getting a tad fed up. This is not a knock on the owners in terms of without them we would not have a club but personally I would rather we ditch the nice guy bit and start winning things. The family club shtick is wearing a bit thin from my end but completely understand those with the viewpoint that it’s just a place to meet mates, have a beer etc and everything else is a bonus.
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
This sounds like a pitch for the mod job.Beradogs wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:37 pm A successful structure in terms of we got out of non league. I don’t see much success elsewhere. We used to be known as a solid championship level club and for however many years since we just make up the numbers. I am running out of years to see us achieve something so forgive me for getting a tad fed up. This is not a knock on the owners in terms of without them we would not have a club but personally I would rather we ditch the nice guy bit and start winning things. The family club shtick is wearing a bit thin from my end but completely understand those with the viewpoint that it’s just a place to meet mates, have a beer etc and everything else is a bonus.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1027 times
- Been thanked: 922 times
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Obviously you can say that .Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:35 pmGood point. You cannot tell me that Fletcher was the best of the 40 candidates who was happy to accept this.redintheface wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:32 pmYou’re right of course it didn’t stop JE joining but was it a precondition that RE and Webb stayed in place when he took over? ( rhetorical question).Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 pm We have a successful structure. Should we tear it up just because Justin died? Existing setup didn't stop Justin from joining. I'm sure experienced managers applied this time around but maybe there is something in this guy that the board have seen?
Maybe 1 or 2 others were not aware of that .
But if they are not managers winning with a 60 % win ratio , what right do they have to demand something different .
The days of managers running a club have been gone since the 80s .
Most managers would give a mate a job , which is something ling seems to be accused of constantly by sime
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Are YOU accusing him of it?tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:51 pmObviously you can say that .Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:35 pmGood point. You cannot tell me that Fletcher was the best of the 40 candidates who was happy to accept this.redintheface wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:32 pm
You’re right of course it didn’t stop JE joining but was it a precondition that RE and Webb stayed in place when he took over? ( rhetorical question).
Maybe 1 or 2 others were not aware of that .
But if they are not managers winning with a 60 % win ratio , what right do they have to demand something different .
The days of managers running a club have been gone since the 80s .
Most managers would give a mate a job , which is something ling seems to be accused of constantly by sime
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4445
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 896 times
- Been thanked: 963 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Leyton Orient is more than Justin Edinburgh and last season. If it’s all about structure and maintaining the status quo, why doesn’t Ling appoint himself as manager and leave the coaching to the coaching setup.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 pm We have a successful structure. Should we tear it up just because Justin died? Existing setup didn't stop Justin from joining. I'm sure experienced managers applied this time around but maybe there is something in this guy that the board have seen?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
It’s not necessarily ‘normal’ but the club have announced from day one this is the model we will be using. Given we’ve gone from literally no football club to this team achieving a promotion 18 months later, it’s difficult to argue against it.Beradogs wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:10 pm Backroom team staying as a prerequisite and even that Ling stays? This guy we are interviewing has had one job in 6 years as a manager and was rubbish assuming managing is a results business. One can only assume most credible candidates want to bring in their own people. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than me can answer whether it is normal for a club to insist on current staff staying or do most clubs who get a new manager allow them to have Carte blanche over hires?
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
TBF it’s pretty easy actually.RedO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:54 pmIt’s not necessarily ‘normal’ but the club have announced from day one this is the model we will be using. Given we’ve gone from literally no football club to this team achieving a promotion 18 months later, it’s difficult to argue against it.Beradogs wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:10 pm Backroom team staying as a prerequisite and even that Ling stays? This guy we are interviewing has had one job in 6 years as a manager and was rubbish assuming managing is a results business. One can only assume most credible candidates want to bring in their own people. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than me can answer whether it is normal for a club to insist on current staff staying or do most clubs who get a new manager allow them to have Carte blanche over hires?
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Of vourse notDisoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:53 pmAre YOU accusing him of it?tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:51 pmObviously you can say that .Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:35 pm
Good point. You cannot tell me that Fletcher was the best of the 40 candidates who was happy to accept this.
Maybe 1 or 2 others were not aware of that .
But if they are not managers winning with a 60 % win ratio , what right do they have to demand something different .
The days of managers running a club have been gone since the 80s .
Most managers would give a mate a job , which is something ling seems to be accused of constantly by sime
Im happy ling picks ling ahead of judd week in week out
I dont accuse him of anything
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
How many promotions in 2 years would be considered successful to you, if 1 isn’t good enough?
2?
3?
2?
3?
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Great to hear fella.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:10 pmOf vourse notDisoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:53 pmAre YOU accusing him of it?tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:51 pm
Obviously you can say that .
Maybe 1 or 2 others were not aware of that .
But if they are not managers winning with a 60 % win ratio , what right do they have to demand something different .
The days of managers running a club have been gone since the 80s .
Most managers would give a mate a job , which is something ling seems to be accused of constantly by sime
Im happy ling picks ling ahead of judd week in week out
I dont accuse him of anything
I am unhappy that Ling picks Ling ahead of Judd week in week out. Nepotism has no place in our game.
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Nepotism has nothing to do with itDisoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:12 pmGreat to hear fella.
I am unhappy that Ling picks Ling ahead of Judd week in week out. Nepotism has no place in our game.
Ling jnr is a better foitballer than juddy
Like it or not its the troof !
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
It’s all opinions fella. That’s what makes the game so interesting.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:17 pmNepotism has nothing to do with itDisoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:12 pmGreat to hear fella.
I am unhappy that Ling picks Ling ahead of Judd week in week out. Nepotism has no place in our game.
Ling jnr is a better foitballer than juddy
Like it or not its the troof !
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 12:05 pm
- Has thanked: 630 times
- Been thanked: 255 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
No it wasn't, Webb was still u18s coach & JE promoted him to assist with 1st team.redintheface wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:32 pmYou’re right of course it didn’t stop JE joining but was it a precondition that RE and Webb stayed in place when he took over? ( rhetorical question).Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 pm We have a successful structure. Should we tear it up just because Justin died? Existing setup didn't stop Justin from joining. I'm sure experienced managers applied this time around but maybe there is something in this guy that the board have seen?
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
The opinion of the board & important people at the club have the opinion thatDisoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:19 pmIt’s all opinions fella. That’s what makes the game so interesting.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:17 pmNepotism has nothing to do with itDisoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:12 pm
Great to hear fella.
I am unhappy that Ling picks Ling ahead of Judd week in week out. Nepotism has no place in our game.
Ling jnr is a better foitballer than juddy
Like it or not its the troof !
We have a set up that is good & just needs a head coach to the steer the ship.
No need for people to bring in their own team .
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Aye. I bet the White Star Line said the same when they employed Captain John Smith too.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:25 pmThe opinion of the board & important people at the club have the opinion thatDisoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:19 pmIt’s all opinions fella. That’s what makes the game so interesting.
We have a set up that is good & just needs a head coach to the steer the ship.
No need for people to bring in their own team .
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
You mean Captain Edward Smith ?
Man who captained r.m.s majestic 1899 & held the blue riband for a short time, then captained most of the new big ships for there maiden voyages
Including Baltic, Adriatic , Olympic .
Wasnt he know as the Millionaires Captain too .
Still he was captain of a ship that sank so only he was to blame ?
Nothing to do with white star letting a fire burn for a week & thinking they could get away with it .
Not that they wanted to mind you.
Nothing like an insurance scam
Man who captained r.m.s majestic 1899 & held the blue riband for a short time, then captained most of the new big ships for there maiden voyages
Including Baltic, Adriatic , Olympic .
Wasnt he know as the Millionaires Captain too .
Still he was captain of a ship that sank so only he was to blame ?
Nothing to do with white star letting a fire burn for a week & thinking they could get away with it .
Not that they wanted to mind you.
Nothing like an insurance scam
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7738
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3420 times
- Been thanked: 1771 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
This ^^^Beradogs wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:37 pm This is not a knock on the owners in terms of without them we would not have a club but personally I would rather we ditch the nice guy bit and start winning things. The family club shtick is wearing a bit thin from my end but completely understand those with the viewpoint that it’s just a place to meet mates, have a beer etc and everything else is a bonus.
When Kent asked how important the "family club" is to Twitter my response was pretty blunt... I value a successful club more.
We were just beginning to shake that "nice but toothless" image under JE and had a bit of edge, a ruthless winning streak that was a joy to watch as it was so un-Orient like to be winners. Not sure if we'll ever quite get that back again now
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:08 pm
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
Re: Why are we insisting on the
Correct.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:54 pmLeyton Orient is more than Justin Edinburgh and last season. If it’s all about structure and maintaining the status quo, why doesn’t Ling appoint himself as manager and leave the coaching to the coaching setup.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 pm We have a successful structure. Should we tear it up just because Justin died? Existing setup didn't stop Justin from joining. I'm sure experienced managers applied this time around but maybe there is something in this guy that the board have seen?
Who has final say on signings?
If it’s Ling them make him manager.