Lock Him Up!
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:48 am
- Has thanked: 345 times
- Been thanked: 360 times
Lock Him Up!
Scottish appeal judges rule in Court That Bojo lied to the Queen in proroguing Parliament. As this was in such a serious matter of State, sounds to me like High Treason. Is hanging, drawing & quartering still on the statute books?
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 1:27 pm
- Has thanked: 1780 times
- Been thanked: 304 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4866
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1185 times
- Been thanked: 813 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1163 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Shame for you the Scottish courts didn't rule as you allege.West Side Story wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:05 pm Scottish appeal judges rule in Court That Bojo lied to the Queen in proroguing Parliament. As this was in such a serious matter of State, sounds to me like High Treason. Is hanging, drawing & quartering still on the statute books?
- F*ck The Poor & Fat
- Regular
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 380 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Far too tough. Hanging is enough.West Side Story wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:05 pm Scottish appeal judges rule in Court That Bojo lied to the Queen in proroguing Parliament. As this was in such a serious matter of State, sounds to me like High Treason. Is hanging, drawing & quartering still on the statute books?
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 1:27 pm
- Has thanked: 1780 times
- Been thanked: 304 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
England and Wales courts disagree with the Scots - wonder why? 2-1 up and now into extra time at the Supreme Court. Either way, we will be free on Nov 1st
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12911
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1066 times
- Been thanked: 2914 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
The lies were pretty obvious from the start and one of the judges remarked on it. The actual ruling is more important as it makes the suspension of parliament unlawful. I fully expect the Supreme Court to uphold this ruling.spen666 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:20 pmShame for you the Scottish courts didn't rule as you allege.West Side Story wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:05 pm Scottish appeal judges rule in Court That Bojo lied to the Queen in proroguing Parliament. As this was in such a serious matter of State, sounds to me like High Treason. Is hanging, drawing & quartering still on the statute books?
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:40 pm
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
I don't think Her Majestyn was lied to, she would have signed off on anything her government handed her without reason or question, remember the last monarch who went against this ended up nine inches shorter.
Lying to the voting public is another matter. The courts have already decided that in political campaigning you can come out with cartloads of B******T without any problem at all. Lying to parliament is also not now seen as much of a problem as it was in the past. (Westland report et al) I will leave it to Spen to define what constitutes treason, but I can't see anything in this whole sorry mess that it could be applied to.
Mikero
Lying to the voting public is another matter. The courts have already decided that in political campaigning you can come out with cartloads of B******T without any problem at all. Lying to parliament is also not now seen as much of a problem as it was in the past. (Westland report et al) I will leave it to Spen to define what constitutes treason, but I can't see anything in this whole sorry mess that it could be applied to.
Mikero
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:52 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 46 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Exactly. Funny how suddenly some on this board think Scottish Law more important than English or Welsh.
Fact is apart from London, the SE of England and Scotland the rest of the the uk voted to leave the EU. Overall the majority who voted to leave was over 1,400,000.
That is democracy not the desperate despicable acts of an opposition aided and abetted by a very biased, uncouth, cocky, arrogant Speaker who has suddenly realised he will lose his seat at the next General Election as can’t stand as a Conservative because he’ll be deselected and the Conservative majority in his constituency is over 20,000
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:55 am
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 209 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Apparently Farage is according to Downing St " not a fit and proper person to be in government"
They should know, plenty of experience with that particular trait
They should know, plenty of experience with that particular trait
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1163 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Irrespective of what version of events you believe to be true in the whole Brexit saga, I struggle to see any offence of treason by anyone.
The nearest I can see is under the Treason Act 1351 which had an offence as follows
"adhering to the sovereign's enemies, giving them aid and comfort, in the realm or elsewhere"
It is really not credible to say the EU are the sovereigns enemies.
All this talk of treason doesn't help the issues. To disagree with others is not treason
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Uncouth?Winchesterfan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:21 pmExactly. Funny how suddenly some on this board think Scottish Law more important than English or Welsh.
Fact is apart from London, the SE of England and Scotland the rest of the the uk voted to leave the EU. Overall the majority who voted to leave was over 1,400,000.
That is democracy not the desperate despicable acts of an opposition aided and abetted by a very biased, uncouth, cocky, arrogant Speaker who has suddenly realised he will lose his seat at the next General Election as can’t stand as a Conservative because he’ll be deselected and the Conservative majority in his constituency is over 20,000
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:52 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 46 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Definition ‘lacking good manners, refinement or grace’.Disoriented wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:57 pmUncouth?Winchesterfan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:21 pmExactly. Funny how suddenly some on this board think Scottish Law more important than English or Welsh.
Fact is apart from London, the SE of England and Scotland the rest of the the uk voted to leave the EU. Overall the majority who voted to leave was over 1,400,000.
That is democracy not the desperate despicable acts of an opposition aided and abetted by a very biased, uncouth, cocky, arrogant Speaker who has suddenly realised he will lose his seat at the next General Election as can’t stand as a Conservative because he’ll be deselected and the Conservative majority in his constituency is over 20,000
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:40 pm
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Yes there was a majority, yes we should leave but everyone, including MPs, have the right to criticise how it is being done without being subject to constant abuse.
Mikero
Mikero
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12911
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1066 times
- Been thanked: 2914 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Wrong. The Scottish decision was made at Appeal Court level but the English decision was made at 1st instance level. The Scottish decision being the higher court prevails.
Why is Spen not pointing this out? Lazy sod.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:33 pm
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Being a Remoaner you would.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 1:00 pmThe lies were pretty obvious from the start and one of the judges remarked on it. The actual ruling is more important as it makes the suspension of parliament unlawful. I fully expect the Supreme Court to uphold this ruling.spen666 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:20 pmShame for you the Scottish courts didn't rule as you allege.West Side Story wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:05 pm Scottish appeal judges rule in Court That Bojo lied to the Queen in proroguing Parliament. As this was in such a serious matter of State, sounds to me like High Treason. Is hanging, drawing & quartering still on the statute books?
Just face it you Lost.
We're Leaving the EU.
Look on the bright side, we should finish mid-table.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13034
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 2646 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
I think you're find the Supreme Court prevails and that sits next week .Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:54 pmWrong. The Scottish decision was made at Appeal Court level but the English decision was made at 1st instance level. The Scottish decision being the higher court prevails.
Why is Spen not pointing this out? Lazy sod.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:49 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 446 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Ah yes, weren't the Leavers calling them all traitors a few months ago?RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:56 pmI think you're find the Supreme Court prevails and that sits next week .Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:54 pmWrong. The Scottish decision was made at Appeal Court level but the English decision was made at 1st instance level. The Scottish decision being the higher court prevails.
Why is Spen not pointing this out? Lazy sod.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1163 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Iam not sure you are correct.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:54 pmWrong. The Scottish decision was made at Appeal Court level but the English decision was made at 1st instance level. The Scottish decision being the higher court prevails.
Why is Spen not pointing this out? Lazy sod.
The Scottish Appellate Court is not a higher court than the English High Court because they are separate legal systems and these respective courts only have authority within their jurisdictions.
The Supreme Court is different as its jurisdiction covers the United Kingdom (and when sitting as Privvy Council, much of the former Commonwealth)
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12911
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1066 times
- Been thanked: 2914 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
Of course it does. Where did I say it didn't. As matters currently stand the decision is unlawful unless the SC rules otherwise.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:56 pmI think you're find the Supreme Court prevails and that sits next week .Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:54 pmWrong. The Scottish decision was made at Appeal Court level but the English decision was made at 1st instance level. The Scottish decision being the higher court prevails.
Why is Spen not pointing this out? Lazy sod.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12911
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1066 times
- Been thanked: 2914 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
It was produced as evidence during the hearing and one of the judges remarked on it. I'm sure it will feature in the written decision when it's issued.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12911
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1066 times
- Been thanked: 2914 times
Re: Lock Him Up!
I'm sure I'm right.spen666 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:00 amIam not sure you are correct.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:54 pmWrong. The Scottish decision was made at Appeal Court level but the English decision was made at 1st instance level. The Scottish decision being the higher court prevails.
Why is Spen not pointing this out? Lazy sod.
The Scottish Appellate Court is not a higher court than the English High Court because they are separate legal systems and these respective courts only have authority within their jurisdictions.
The Supreme Court is different as its jurisdiction covers the United Kingdom (and when sitting as Privvy Council, much of the former Commonwealth)