Will this gshaw conspiracy theory now be put to bed?

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Unless the linesman had his mobile off last night when the efl tried to call him about making sure orient fail at every opportunity?
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... tch-report

[GibbO]

That decision was an EFL false flag operation to put you off the scent of them doing Orient over at every turn. Don’t let it succeed.

[gshaw]

Best wait for the outcome of the second leg first...

[Max B Gold]

Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.

Does Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.

[The Mindsweep]

Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.

Dies Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.

Beckles was given the assist

[DelightInE10]

Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.

Dies Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.

That referee was poo poo all round - that goal was miles offside considering Beckles got his head to it, but the first penalty shout was a clear penalty when Kelman went down just inside the box

[Hoover Attack]

Thought the ref was too lax throughout, numerous bookings were let go for both teams.

Only seen their penalty back once, but thought the striker was all over the back of REG and that’s why his arm was in the air.

[Mistadobalina]

The Beckles grapple on their forward felt more of a pen to me - as HV said, the forward pushes down on Reg and so should have been a foul, but it's a 50/50.

I can see how the Kelman first goal was given, even if it's an awful decision. Wasn't massively clear in real time whether Beckles touched it on the way and if he doesn't, then it's not offside.

[Hoover Attack]

Saw Omar’s headlock back on the highlights and yeah, it’s ridiculous that sort of thing is regularly allowed.

I’ve heard that the officials have said they knew Beckles touched it, which doesn’t make any sense at all.

[gshaw]

I’ve heard that the officials have said they knew Beckles touched it, which doesn’t make any sense at all.

I read that too, that definitely needs a "what were you thinking" explanation from the referee as I can't see how you could award the goal knowing Beckles touched it. Not complaining mind but very bizarre

[North Stand Dave]

MaxBGold, shut up you Muppet
Refferes & linos make loads of mistakes.
If that's the case will Barnsleys second goal against us was well offside aswell, will that be chalked off.
These officials are on good money per game.
It's embarrassing the mistakes some make

[OyinbO]

Unless the linesman had his mobile off last night when the efl tried to call him about making sure orient fail at every opportunity?
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... tch-report

Abysmal biased reporting. No wonder no-one wants to put their name to it. Liquidate.

[Captain Zep]

MaxBGold, shut up you Muppet
Refferes & linos make loads of mistakes.
If that's the case will Barnsleys second goal against us was well offside aswell, will that be chalked off.
These officials are on good money per game.
It's embarrassing the mistakes some make

Barnsley's goal was onside, it was a good decision.

[Bandy Legs]

The Beckles grapple on their forward felt more of a pen to me - as HV said, the forward pushes down on Reg and so should have been a foul, but it's a 50/50.

I can see how the Kelman first goal was given, even if it's an awful decision. Wasn't massively clear in real time whether Beckles touched it on the way and if he doesn't, then it's not offside.

Disagree, Beckles & his opposite had been mma at every corner, Charlie was a blatant trip in the box.
VAR would have given that as a clear & obvious mistake.
MMA grappling I'm not so sure

[DuvB]

Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.

Dies Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.

That referee was poo poo all round - that goal was miles offside considering Beckles got his head to it, but the first penalty shout was a clear penalty when Kelman went down just inside the box

I have watched our first goal multiple times and I cant see that Beckles touched it. Therefore Kelman was onside from the Clare header

[Stamford O]

Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.

Dies Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.

That referee was poo poo all round - that goal was miles offside considering Beckles got his head to it, but the first penalty shout was a clear penalty when Kelman went down just inside the box

I have watched our first goal multiple times and I cant see that Beckles touched it. Therefore Kelman was onside from the Clare header

When the ball was headed forward charlie was onside,only question is did it touch buckles head,so not as clear cut as it seems when charlie received ball as he had run forward